Skip to content
Permalink
5106119e87
Switch branches/tags

Name already in use

A tag already exists with the provided branch name. Many Git commands accept both tag and branch names, so creating this branch may cause unexpected behavior. Are you sure you want to create this branch?
Go to file
 
 
Cannot retrieve contributors at this time
296 lines (247 sloc) 14.8 KB
APACHE 2.4 STATUS: -*- mode: text; coding: utf-8 -*-
Last modified at [$Date$]
The current version of this file can be found at:
* http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS
Documentation status is maintained separately and can be found at:
* docs/STATUS in this source tree, or
* http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/docs/STATUS
The current development branch of this software can be found at:
* http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/trunk
Consult the following STATUS files for information on related projects:
* http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/apr/apr/trunk/STATUS
* http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/apr/apr/branches/1.4.x/STATUS
* http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/apr/apr-util/branches/1.4.x/STATUS
Patches considered for backport are noted in their branches' STATUS:
* http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/branches/2.0.x/STATUS
* http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/STATUS
* http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS
Release history:
[NOTE that x.{odd}.z versions are strictly Alpha/Beta releases,
while x.{even}.z versions are Stable/GA releases.]
2.4.5 : In development
2.4.4 : Tagged on February 18, 2013. Released Feb 25, 2013
2.4.3 : Tagged on August 17, 2012. Released Aug 18, 2012
2.4.2 : Tagged on April 5, 2012. Released Apr 17, 2012.
2.4.1 : Tagged on February 13, 2012. Released Feb 21, 2012.
2.4.0 : Tagged on January 16, 2012, not released.
2.3.16 : Tagged on December 15, 2011.
2.3.15 : Tagged on November 8, 2011. Released Nov. 15, 2011.
2.3.14 : Tagged on August 1, 2011. Released Aug. 9, 2011.
2.3.13 : Tagged on June 28, 2011, not released.
2.3.12 : Tagged on May 11, 2011. Released May 23, 2011.
2.3.11 : Released as Beta on March 7, 2011.
2.3.10 : Tagged on December 13, 2010. Released Dec 21, 2010.
2.3.9 : Tagged on November 23, 2010, not released.
2.3.8 : Tagged on August 24, 2010.
2.3.7 : Tagged on August 19, 2010, not released.
2.3.6 : Released on June 21, 2010.
2.3.5 : Released on January 26, 2010.
2.3.4 : Released on December 8, 2009.
2.3.3 : Tagged on November 11, 2009, not released.
2.3.2 : Tagged on March 23, 2009, not released.
2.3.1 : Tagged on January 2, 2009, not released.
2.3.0 : Tagged on December 6, 2008, not released.
Contributors looking for a mission:
* Just do an egrep on "TODO" or "XXX" in the source.
* Review the bug database at: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/
* Review the "PatchAvailable" bugs in the bug database:
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/buglist.cgi?bug_status=NEW&bug_status=ASSIGNED&bug_status=REOPENED&product=Apache+httpd-2&keywords=PatchAvailable
After testing, you can append a comment saying "Reviewed and tested".
* Open bugs in the bug database.
* See also the STATUS file in the docs/ directory, which lists documentation-specific TODO items.
CURRENT RELEASE NOTES:
* Forward binary compatibility is expected of Apache 2.4.x releases, such
that no MMN major number changes will occur after 2.4.1. Such changes can
only be made in the trunk.
* All commits to branches/2.4.x must be reflected in SVN trunk,
as well, if they apply. Logical progression is commit to trunk
then merge into branches/2.4.x, as applicable.
RELEASE SHOWSTOPPERS:
PATCHES ACCEPTED TO BACKPORT FROM TRUNK:
[ start all new proposals below, under PATCHES PROPOSED. ]
* mod_cache_disk: fix merge of min/max file size by setting corresponding _set
trunk patch: http://svn.apache.org/r1453604
2.4.x patch: trunk patch works
+1: humbedooh, jim, covener
PATCHES PROPOSED TO BACKPORT FROM TRUNK:
[ New proposals should be added at the end of the list ]
* mod_proxy: Allow balancers and ProxyPass to be server-specific, as
they should have been. Inheritance causes too many behind-the-scene
interactions to be reliable in a dynamic environ. We maintain the
old-default of inheritance.
trunk patch: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1387603
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1388029
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1420124
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1421288
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1421912
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1422943
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1422980
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1430575
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1439404
2.4.x patch: http://people.apache.org/~jim/patches/proxypassinherit-v2.patch
+1: jim, druggeri
rjung: directive help text describes "on" and then says: "(Not recommended if
using the Balancer Manager)". Since "on" is the default, should we probably
say "(Setting to Off recommended if using the Balancer Manager)"?
* mod_ssl: add support for subjectAltName-based host name checking
in proxy mode (PR 54030)
trunk patch: https://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=r1425874
https://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=r1426850
2.4.x patch: trunk patch works (modulo CHANGES and next-number)
+1: kbrand
* mod_authnz_ldap: Allow using exec: callouts like SSLPassphraseDialog
for AuthLDAPBindPassword.
trunk patch: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1433478
2.4.x patch: http://people.apache.org/~druggeri/patches/AuthLDAPBindPasswordExec-2.4.patch
(20130119 - updated to include minor mmn bump)
+1: druggeri, jim
covener: minor MMM bump? (Thanks for reminder. This is done. -druggeri)
* mod_ssl: Quiet FIPS mode weak keys disabled and FIPS not selected emits
in the error log to debug level. [William Rowe]
trunk patch: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1447993
2.4.x patch: trunk patch applies.
+1: wrowe, covener
* mod_lua: Sync 2.4 branch with trunk. This includes (but is not limited to)
Server pools, new apr functions for the request_rec table, input/
output filters, LuaCodeCache, LuaMapHandler and multipart form data
handling. This is long overdue, and has become too spaghetti-ish to
propose in chunks :|
trunk patch: http://svn.apache.org/r1366890
http://svn.apache.org/r1367025
http://svn.apache.org/r1367040
http://svn.apache.org/r1367048
http://svn.apache.org/r1383024
http://svn.apache.org/r1383028
http://svn.apache.org/r1383037
http://svn.apache.org/r1367725
http://svn.apache.org/r1367875
http://svn.apache.org/r1368109
http://svn.apache.org/r1369656
http://svn.apache.org/r1369793
http://svn.apache.org/r1369800
http://svn.apache.org/r1370158
http://svn.apache.org/r1433967
http://svn.apache.org/r1429169
http://svn.apache.org/r1425450
http://svn.apache.org/r1425243
http://svn.apache.org/r1422552
http://svn.apache.org/r1422548
http://svn.apache.org/r1422531
http://svn.apache.org/r1422373
http://svn.apache.org/r1422072
http://svn.apache.org/r1421784
http://svn.apache.org/r1421780
(the list goes on...)
2.4.x patch: http://www.humbedooh.com/mod_lua_sync.patch (+CHANGES)
+1: humbedooh, jim
A list of further possible backports can be found at:
http://people.apache.org/~rjung/patches/possible-backports-httpd-trunk-2_4.txt
If you want to propose one of those, please still add them here.
OTHER PROPOSALS
* opinion on more complete DefaultRuntimeDir use in 2.4.x?
o If a module has a config directive for the run-time file that
treats the configured path as relative to server root, preserve
that behavior but change the location when not configured to
respect DefaultRuntimeDir. With these changes, users with no
per-runtime-file configuration directives can control
everything with DefaultRuntimeDir.
BUT: Existing users of DefaultRuntimeDir might get a short-term scare
when some unconfigured run-time file starts respecting their
DefaultRuntimeDir directive after an upgrade.
+1: trawick, jim, rjung
rjung: applicable trunk revisions WITHOUT the compatibility tweaks
described above:
scoreboard r1369477
core/pid file r1369808
core/mutex r1370288
mod_socache_XXX r1370225, r1407385
mod_ldap r1371684
mod_cache r1407381
mod_slotmem_plain r1370763
igalic: We have three votes, what's the status here?
Independently, backport any doc tweaks to 2.4 API migration page.
PATCHES/ISSUES THAT ARE STALLED
* cross-compile: allow to provide CC_FOR_BUILD so that gen_test_char will be
compiled by the build compiler instead of the host compiler.
Also set CC_FOR_BUILD to 'cc' when cross-compilation is detected.
Trunk patches: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1327907
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1328390
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1328714
2.4 patch: http://people.apache.org/~fuankg/diffs/httpd-2.4.x-cross_compile.diff
fuankg: on hold until we agree for a better and more simple solution ...
* mod_ssl: Add support for Next Protocol Negotiation.
Trunk patch:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1332643
2.4.x patch:
Trunk patch works.
+1: ben
sf says: Needs r1345599, too.
And wrowe's comment about the 2.2 patch is also valid for 2.4:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1354823
* mod_ssl: Add RFC 5878 support. This allows support of mechansisms
such as Certificate Transparency. Note that new
mechanisms are supported without software updates.
trunk patch: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1352596
2.4.x patch: http://people.apache.org/~ben/httpd-2.4-rfc5878.patch
+1: ben, druggeri
-1: kbrand
druggeri note: Needs docs for new directive
kbrand: depends on an unreleased OpenSSL version (1.0.2), and
RFC 5878 is of "Category: Experimental". Seems premature
to me to consider for backporting to 2.4/2.2 at this point.
The API in the OpenSSL implementation from May 2012
(http://cvs.openssl.org/chngview?cn=22601) only covers the
privately-defined TLSEXT_AUTHZDATAFORMAT_audit_proof, there's
no support for x509_attr_cert (section 3.3.1 in RFC 5878) or
saml_assertion (3.3.2). SSL_CTX_use_authz_file doesn't have
any docs in OpenSSL, either, and there's no "openssl foo ..."
command or similar to create/manage such files. Trunk is
the right place where it can grow.
Finally, httpd-2.4-rfc5878.patch includes a build-system change
which is unrelated to this feature (see separate proposal from
rjung below, ssl-support-uninstalled-openssl-2_4.patch).
ben: not correct that it depends on OpenSSL 1.0.2, it builds with
any version. Also, if you read my note to dev@ you will see
why it is not premature.
minfrin: once this gets docs, +1.
* Makefile.win: Added copying of .vbs / .wsf CGIs to Windows install target.
Moved fixing of shebang to separate target so that it is
no longer executed by default and all CGIs remain inactive.
trunk patch: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1387984
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1421203
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1421591
2.4.x patch: http://people.apache.org/~fuankg/diffs/httpd-2.4.x-Makefile.win.diff
+1 fuankg, gsmith
-.8: trawick
This commit is essentially deciding that an httpd install on
Windows now has printenv/testcgi written in 2 more languages.
To the extent that the usefulness is that it shows how to make scripts
of these types executable by httpd, I believe that the documentation
is the proper place to solve that. To the extent that the usefullness
is to show how to implement a CGI in these particular languages, I believe
that the httpd distribution and documentation in general is not the
place for that. Historically these types of scripts have caused problems
for downstream vendorsas well as newbies (and sometimes the intersection
of those two groups) who don't understand that these are information leaks
once they are enabled, and the subtlety of the way they are disabled ("Apache
messed up the first line; let me fix that") contributes to that.
fuankg notes: I've just added a big warning to all CGI scripts which should now
make absolutely clear that these CGIs are for testing purpose only - so those
who enable those scripts with inserting the right shebang should be 100% aware
of any risks (this should cover your last point).
jim: trawick, does the above address your concerns?
trawick: to some extent (somebody reading the script gets an idea)
Why isn't the configuration requirement documented instead
of described indirectly in a sample?
Why are these new samples added to the install without three
votes? (I didn't veto it; put your name next to the two
existing ones and I'll be satisified that enough people
considered this addition as an appropriate solution for a
real httpd usability problem.)
wrowe: I'd agree with trawick, and suggest that these scripts can begin
their life somewhere in the manual/ tree. This really seems like
the place where /usr/share/httpd/examples/ would be useful, but
there isn't an ordinary directory for that. Since we want none
of the scripts to function 'out of the box', what about a new
cgi-examples/ dir alongside cgi-bin/? Otherwise manual/cgi/examples
might work?