From 42de9f016ad6db63dbf9e5618bf23a0c70d21877 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 17:01:15 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] --- yaml --- r: 164366 b: refs/heads/master c:
 478b81fd84a299adb401dbbae296f3767e552999 h: refs/heads/master v: v3

---
 [refs]                | 2 +-
 trunk/mm/page_alloc.c | 4 ----
 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/[refs] b/[refs]
index 64e8daf8bfd8..3d577e290828 100644
--- a/[refs]
+++ b/[refs]
@@ -1,2 +1,2 @@
 ---
-refs/heads/master: a5abeeacc44bbef2935a7a8e939264c28962def2
+refs/heads/master: 478b81fd84a299adb401dbbae296f3767e552999
diff --git a/trunk/mm/page_alloc.c b/trunk/mm/page_alloc.c
index a0de15f46987..f4e929e356db 100644
--- a/trunk/mm/page_alloc.c
+++ b/trunk/mm/page_alloc.c
@@ -1627,10 +1627,6 @@ __alloc_pages_direct_reclaim(gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned int order,
 
 	/* We now go into synchronous reclaim */
 	cpuset_memory_pressure_bump();
-
-	/*
-	 * The task's cpuset might have expanded its set of allowable nodes
-	 */
 	p->flags |= PF_MEMALLOC;
 	lockdep_set_current_reclaim_state(gfp_mask);
 	reclaim_state.reclaimed_slab = 0;