From 92e22ffa231f7dc2eaa4ae9e92cd4f293742a339 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Josh Triplett Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2006 02:17:16 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] --- yaml --- r: 38455 b: refs/heads/master c: 4b6c2cca6eef9cc4a15350bf1c61839e12e08b84 h: refs/heads/master i: 38453: 3733568204ed79e54e455e8f645bc389e474055e 38451: c270ac5aa386c158a7bf50b618ffe6859042c309 38447: b696a7a795a45d88749d0bac474ade0e051d41c4 v: v3 --- [refs] | 2 +- trunk/Documentation/RCU/torture.txt | 5 ++-- trunk/kernel/rcutorture.c | 40 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- 3 files changed, 43 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/[refs] b/[refs] index 84aea4997a39..8b6b4f7d2435 100644 --- a/[refs] +++ b/[refs] @@ -1,2 +1,2 @@ --- -refs/heads/master: 11a147013e39ff4cb031395cb78a9d307c4799cd +refs/heads/master: 4b6c2cca6eef9cc4a15350bf1c61839e12e08b84 diff --git a/trunk/Documentation/RCU/torture.txt b/trunk/Documentation/RCU/torture.txt index cc4b1efe5ea8..25a3c3f7d378 100644 --- a/trunk/Documentation/RCU/torture.txt +++ b/trunk/Documentation/RCU/torture.txt @@ -56,8 +56,9 @@ test_no_idle_hz Whether or not to test the ability of RCU to operate in torture_type The type of RCU to test: "rcu" for the rcu_read_lock() API, "rcu_sync" for rcu_read_lock() with synchronous reclamation, "rcu_bh" for the rcu_read_lock_bh() API, "rcu_bh_sync" for - rcu_read_lock_bh() with synchronous reclamation, and "srcu" - for the "srcu_read_lock()" API. + rcu_read_lock_bh() with synchronous reclamation, "srcu" for + the "srcu_read_lock()" API, and "sched" for the use of + preempt_disable() together with synchronize_sched(). verbose Enable debug printk()s. Default is disabled. diff --git a/trunk/kernel/rcutorture.c b/trunk/kernel/rcutorture.c index 0f0ff1556b5d..e2bda18f6f42 100644 --- a/trunk/kernel/rcutorture.c +++ b/trunk/kernel/rcutorture.c @@ -464,9 +464,47 @@ static struct rcu_torture_ops srcu_ops = { .name = "srcu" }; +/* + * Definitions for sched torture testing. + */ + +static int sched_torture_read_lock(void) +{ + preempt_disable(); + return 0; +} + +static void sched_torture_read_unlock(int idx) +{ + preempt_enable(); +} + +static int sched_torture_completed(void) +{ + return 0; +} + +static void sched_torture_synchronize(void) +{ + synchronize_sched(); +} + +static struct rcu_torture_ops sched_ops = { + .init = rcu_sync_torture_init, + .cleanup = NULL, + .readlock = sched_torture_read_lock, + .readdelay = rcu_read_delay, /* just reuse rcu's version. */ + .readunlock = sched_torture_read_unlock, + .completed = sched_torture_completed, + .deferredfree = rcu_sync_torture_deferred_free, + .sync = sched_torture_synchronize, + .stats = NULL, + .name = "sched" +}; + static struct rcu_torture_ops *torture_ops[] = { &rcu_ops, &rcu_sync_ops, &rcu_bh_ops, &rcu_bh_sync_ops, &srcu_ops, - NULL }; + &sched_ops, NULL }; /* * RCU torture writer kthread. Repeatedly substitutes a new structure