From b2a8b93de177b5c6a1f6b85032a236e4a419524c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Andreas Herrmann Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2012 17:12:38 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] --- yaml --- r: 299628 b: refs/heads/master c: d7de8649f34d45041409d1af4ba4a521971a9075 h: refs/heads/master v: v3 --- [refs] | 2 +- trunk/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/amd.c | 4 ++-- 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/[refs] b/[refs] index b3aa2960b0db..20b99923cd56 100644 --- a/[refs] +++ b/[refs] @@ -1,2 +1,2 @@ --- -refs/heads/master: 1c2b443e2a4b081870aea25e47d438f8a5326910 +refs/heads/master: d7de8649f34d45041409d1af4ba4a521971a9075 diff --git a/trunk/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/amd.c b/trunk/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/amd.c index 0a44b90602b0..1248f9ceabc1 100644 --- a/trunk/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/amd.c +++ b/trunk/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/amd.c @@ -26,7 +26,8 @@ * contact AMD for precise details and a CPU swap. * * See http://www.multimania.com/poulot/k6bug.html - * http://www.amd.com/K6/k6docs/revgd.html + * and section 2.6.2 of "AMD-K6 Processor Revision Guide - Model 6" + * (Publication # 21266 Issue Date: August 1998) * * The following test is erm.. interesting. AMD neglected to up * the chip setting when fixing the bug but they also tweaked some @@ -94,7 +95,6 @@ static void __cpuinit init_amd_k6(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c) "system stability may be impaired when more than 32 MB are used.\n"); else printk(KERN_CONT "probably OK (after B9730xxxx).\n"); - printk(KERN_INFO "Please see http://membres.lycos.fr/poulot/k6bug.html\n"); } /* K6 with old style WHCR */