From ed4fb4ca092f0d1c97a52f444d657d36ba7d3d5a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2013 05:14:38 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] --- yaml --- r: 351008 b: refs/heads/master c:
 643ae6e81dd65b333a13259852405fc9f764ac76 h: refs/heads/master v: v3

---
 [refs]                          | 2 +-
 trunk/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 7 +++++++
 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/[refs] b/[refs]
index 1b65b42bd001..9988982e7fe2 100644
--- a/[refs]
+++ b/[refs]
@@ -1,2 +1,2 @@
 ---
-refs/heads/master: 8ee2ec51d0916b8c8c4387fb6da5904900ef6b98
+refs/heads/master: 643ae6e81dd65b333a13259852405fc9f764ac76
diff --git a/trunk/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/trunk/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
index 1f93dbd72355..de9951766dd8 100644
--- a/trunk/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
+++ b/trunk/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
@@ -970,6 +970,13 @@ static int cpufreq_add_dev(struct device *dev, struct subsys_interface *sif)
 		pr_debug("initialization failed\n");
 		goto err_unlock_policy;
 	}
+
+	/*
+	 * affected cpus must always be the one, which are online. We aren't
+	 * managing offline cpus here.
+	 */
+	cpumask_and(policy->cpus, policy->cpus, cpu_online_mask);
+
 	policy->user_policy.min = policy->min;
 	policy->user_policy.max = policy->max;