From 167a38dcd5caaa85994ac8b7d2d1c20a71cd947b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2019 00:26:30 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] cpufreq: Pass updated policy to driver ->setpolicy() callback
The invocation of the ->setpolicy() cpufreq driver callback should
be equivalent to calling cpufreq_governor_limits(policy) for drivers
with internal governors, but in fact it isn't so, because the
temporary new_policy object is passed to it instead of the updated
policy.
That is a bit confusing, so make cpufreq_set_policy() pass the
updated policy to the driver ->setpolicy() callback.
No intentional changes of behavior.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
---
drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
index 06b1a954d6e48..0e626b00053b6 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
@@ -2286,7 +2286,7 @@ static int cpufreq_set_policy(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
if (cpufreq_driver->setpolicy) {
policy->policy = new_policy->policy;
pr_debug("setting range\n");
- return cpufreq_driver->setpolicy(new_policy);
+ return cpufreq_driver->setpolicy(policy);
}
if (new_policy->governor == policy->governor) {