From 8d20a739f17a2de9e269db72330f5655d6545dd4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jesse Taube Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2024 12:00:18 -0700 Subject: [PATCH 1/6] RISC-V: Check scalar unaligned access on all CPUs Originally, the check_unaligned_access_emulated_all_cpus function only checked the boot hart. This fixes the function to check all harts. Fixes: 71c54b3d169d ("riscv: report misaligned accesses emulation to hwprobe") Signed-off-by: Jesse Taube Reviewed-by: Charlie Jenkins Reviewed-by: Evan Green Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241017-jesse_unaligned_vector-v10-1-5b33500160f8@rivosinc.com Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt --- arch/riscv/include/asm/cpufeature.h | 2 ++ arch/riscv/kernel/traps_misaligned.c | 14 +++++++------- 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/cpufeature.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/cpufeature.h index 45f9c1171a486..dfa5cdddd3671 100644 --- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/cpufeature.h +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/cpufeature.h @@ -8,6 +8,7 @@ #include #include +#include #include #include #include @@ -60,6 +61,7 @@ void riscv_user_isa_enable(void); #if defined(CONFIG_RISCV_MISALIGNED) bool check_unaligned_access_emulated_all_cpus(void); +void check_unaligned_access_emulated(struct work_struct *work __always_unused); void unaligned_emulation_finish(void); bool unaligned_ctl_available(void); DECLARE_PER_CPU(long, misaligned_access_speed); diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/traps_misaligned.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/traps_misaligned.c index d4fd8af7aaf5a..d076dde5ad204 100644 --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/traps_misaligned.c +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/traps_misaligned.c @@ -526,11 +526,11 @@ int handle_misaligned_store(struct pt_regs *regs) return 0; } -static bool check_unaligned_access_emulated(int cpu) +void check_unaligned_access_emulated(struct work_struct *work __always_unused) { + int cpu = smp_processor_id(); long *mas_ptr = per_cpu_ptr(&misaligned_access_speed, cpu); unsigned long tmp_var, tmp_val; - bool misaligned_emu_detected; *mas_ptr = RISCV_HWPROBE_MISALIGNED_SCALAR_UNKNOWN; @@ -538,19 +538,16 @@ static bool check_unaligned_access_emulated(int cpu) " "REG_L" %[tmp], 1(%[ptr])\n" : [tmp] "=r" (tmp_val) : [ptr] "r" (&tmp_var) : "memory"); - misaligned_emu_detected = (*mas_ptr == RISCV_HWPROBE_MISALIGNED_SCALAR_EMULATED); /* * If unaligned_ctl is already set, this means that we detected that all * CPUS uses emulated misaligned access at boot time. If that changed * when hotplugging the new cpu, this is something we don't handle. */ - if (unlikely(unaligned_ctl && !misaligned_emu_detected)) { + if (unlikely(unaligned_ctl && (*mas_ptr != RISCV_HWPROBE_MISALIGNED_SCALAR_EMULATED))) { pr_crit("CPU misaligned accesses non homogeneous (expected all emulated)\n"); while (true) cpu_relax(); } - - return misaligned_emu_detected; } bool check_unaligned_access_emulated_all_cpus(void) @@ -562,8 +559,11 @@ bool check_unaligned_access_emulated_all_cpus(void) * accesses emulated since tasks requesting such control can run on any * CPU. */ + schedule_on_each_cpu(check_unaligned_access_emulated); + for_each_online_cpu(cpu) - if (!check_unaligned_access_emulated(cpu)) + if (per_cpu(misaligned_access_speed, cpu) + != RISCV_HWPROBE_MISALIGNED_SCALAR_EMULATED) return false; unaligned_ctl = true; From 9c528b5f7927b857b40f3c46afbc869827af3c94 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jesse Taube Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2024 12:00:19 -0700 Subject: [PATCH 2/6] RISC-V: Scalar unaligned access emulated on hotplug CPUs The check_unaligned_access_emulated() function should have been called during CPU hotplug to ensure that if all CPUs had emulated unaligned accesses, the new CPU also does. This patch adds the call to check_unaligned_access_emulated() in the hotplug path. Fixes: 55e0bf49a0d0 ("RISC-V: Probe misaligned access speed in parallel") Signed-off-by: Jesse Taube Reviewed-by: Evan Green Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241017-jesse_unaligned_vector-v10-2-5b33500160f8@rivosinc.com Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt --- arch/riscv/kernel/unaligned_access_speed.c | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/unaligned_access_speed.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/unaligned_access_speed.c index 160628a2116de..f3508cc54f91a 100644 --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/unaligned_access_speed.c +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/unaligned_access_speed.c @@ -191,6 +191,7 @@ static int riscv_online_cpu(unsigned int cpu) if (per_cpu(misaligned_access_speed, cpu) != RISCV_HWPROBE_MISALIGNED_SCALAR_UNKNOWN) goto exit; + check_unaligned_access_emulated(NULL); buf = alloc_pages(GFP_KERNEL, MISALIGNED_BUFFER_ORDER); if (!buf) { pr_warn("Allocation failure, not measuring misaligned performance\n"); From c05a62c92516d7679c819f8a5177cf84c8668954 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jesse Taube Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2024 12:00:20 -0700 Subject: [PATCH 3/6] RISC-V: Replace RISCV_MISALIGNED with RISCV_SCALAR_MISALIGNED Replace RISCV_MISALIGNED with RISCV_SCALAR_MISALIGNED to allow for the addition of RISCV_VECTOR_MISALIGNED in a later patch. Signed-off-by: Jesse Taube Reviewed-by: Conor Dooley Reviewed-by: Charlie Jenkins Reviewed-by: Evan Green Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241017-jesse_unaligned_vector-v10-3-5b33500160f8@rivosinc.com Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt --- arch/riscv/Kconfig | 6 +++--- arch/riscv/include/asm/cpufeature.h | 2 +- arch/riscv/include/asm/entry-common.h | 2 +- arch/riscv/kernel/Makefile | 4 ++-- arch/riscv/kernel/fpu.S | 4 ++-- 5 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/riscv/Kconfig b/arch/riscv/Kconfig index 22dc5ea4196ce..fab7c6bc17298 100644 --- a/arch/riscv/Kconfig +++ b/arch/riscv/Kconfig @@ -784,7 +784,7 @@ config THREAD_SIZE_ORDER Specify the Pages of thread stack size (from 4KB to 64KB), which also affects irq stack size, which is equal to thread stack size. -config RISCV_MISALIGNED +config RISCV_SCALAR_MISALIGNED bool select SYSCTL_ARCH_UNALIGN_ALLOW help @@ -801,7 +801,7 @@ choice config RISCV_PROBE_UNALIGNED_ACCESS bool "Probe for hardware unaligned access support" - select RISCV_MISALIGNED + select RISCV_SCALAR_MISALIGNED help During boot, the kernel will run a series of tests to determine the speed of unaligned accesses. This probing will dynamically determine @@ -812,7 +812,7 @@ config RISCV_PROBE_UNALIGNED_ACCESS config RISCV_EMULATED_UNALIGNED_ACCESS bool "Emulate unaligned access where system support is missing" - select RISCV_MISALIGNED + select RISCV_SCALAR_MISALIGNED help If unaligned memory accesses trap into the kernel as they are not supported by the system, the kernel will emulate the unaligned diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/cpufeature.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/cpufeature.h index dfa5cdddd3671..ccc6cf141c20e 100644 --- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/cpufeature.h +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/cpufeature.h @@ -59,7 +59,7 @@ void riscv_user_isa_enable(void); #define __RISCV_ISA_EXT_SUPERSET_VALIDATE(_name, _id, _sub_exts, _validate) \ _RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA(_name, _id, _sub_exts, ARRAY_SIZE(_sub_exts), _validate) -#if defined(CONFIG_RISCV_MISALIGNED) +#if defined(CONFIG_RISCV_SCALAR_MISALIGNED) bool check_unaligned_access_emulated_all_cpus(void); void check_unaligned_access_emulated(struct work_struct *work __always_unused); void unaligned_emulation_finish(void); diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/entry-common.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/entry-common.h index 2293e535f8659..0a4e3544c877a 100644 --- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/entry-common.h +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/entry-common.h @@ -25,7 +25,7 @@ static inline void arch_exit_to_user_mode_prepare(struct pt_regs *regs, void handle_page_fault(struct pt_regs *regs); void handle_break(struct pt_regs *regs); -#ifdef CONFIG_RISCV_MISALIGNED +#ifdef CONFIG_RISCV_SCALAR_MISALIGNED int handle_misaligned_load(struct pt_regs *regs); int handle_misaligned_store(struct pt_regs *regs); #else diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/Makefile b/arch/riscv/kernel/Makefile index 7f88cc4931f5c..45624c5ea86c6 100644 --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/Makefile +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/Makefile @@ -68,8 +68,8 @@ obj-y += probes/ obj-y += tests/ obj-$(CONFIG_MMU) += vdso.o vdso/ -obj-$(CONFIG_RISCV_MISALIGNED) += traps_misaligned.o -obj-$(CONFIG_RISCV_MISALIGNED) += unaligned_access_speed.o +obj-$(CONFIG_RISCV_SCALAR_MISALIGNED) += traps_misaligned.o +obj-$(CONFIG_RISCV_SCALAR_MISALIGNED) += unaligned_access_speed.o obj-$(CONFIG_RISCV_PROBE_UNALIGNED_ACCESS) += copy-unaligned.o obj-$(CONFIG_FPU) += fpu.o diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/fpu.S b/arch/riscv/kernel/fpu.S index 327cf527dd7e1..f74f6b60e347f 100644 --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/fpu.S +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/fpu.S @@ -170,7 +170,7 @@ SYM_FUNC_END(__fstate_restore) __access_func(f31) -#ifdef CONFIG_RISCV_MISALIGNED +#ifdef CONFIG_RISCV_SCALAR_MISALIGNED /* * Disable compressed instructions set to keep a constant offset between FP @@ -224,4 +224,4 @@ SYM_FUNC_START(get_f64_reg) fp_access_epilogue SYM_FUNC_END(get_f64_reg) -#endif /* CONFIG_RISCV_MISALIGNED */ +#endif /* CONFIG_RISCV_SCALAR_MISALIGNED */ From d1703dc7bc8ec7adb91f5ceaf1556ff1ed212858 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jesse Taube Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2024 12:00:21 -0700 Subject: [PATCH 4/6] RISC-V: Detect unaligned vector accesses supported Run an unaligned vector access to test if the system supports vector unaligned access. Add the result to a new key in hwprobe. This is useful for usermode to know if vector misaligned accesses are supported and if they are faster or slower than equivalent byte accesses. Signed-off-by: Jesse Taube Signed-off-by: Charlie Jenkins Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241017-jesse_unaligned_vector-v10-4-5b33500160f8@rivosinc.com Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt --- arch/riscv/Kconfig | 36 ++++++ arch/riscv/include/asm/cpufeature.h | 8 +- arch/riscv/include/asm/entry-common.h | 11 -- arch/riscv/include/asm/hwprobe.h | 2 +- arch/riscv/include/asm/vector.h | 2 + arch/riscv/include/uapi/asm/hwprobe.h | 5 + arch/riscv/kernel/Makefile | 4 +- arch/riscv/kernel/sys_hwprobe.c | 35 ++++++ arch/riscv/kernel/traps_misaligned.c | 125 ++++++++++++++++++++- arch/riscv/kernel/unaligned_access_speed.c | 22 ++-- arch/riscv/kernel/vector.c | 2 +- 11 files changed, 222 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/riscv/Kconfig b/arch/riscv/Kconfig index fab7c6bc17298..05f698a889777 100644 --- a/arch/riscv/Kconfig +++ b/arch/riscv/Kconfig @@ -784,12 +784,26 @@ config THREAD_SIZE_ORDER Specify the Pages of thread stack size (from 4KB to 64KB), which also affects irq stack size, which is equal to thread stack size. +config RISCV_MISALIGNED + bool + help + Embed support for detecting and emulating misaligned + scalar or vector loads and stores. + config RISCV_SCALAR_MISALIGNED bool + select RISCV_MISALIGNED select SYSCTL_ARCH_UNALIGN_ALLOW help Embed support for emulating misaligned loads and stores. +config RISCV_VECTOR_MISALIGNED + bool + select RISCV_MISALIGNED + depends on RISCV_ISA_V + help + Enable detecting support for vector misaligned loads and stores. + choice prompt "Unaligned Accesses Support" default RISCV_PROBE_UNALIGNED_ACCESS @@ -841,6 +855,28 @@ config RISCV_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS endchoice +choice + prompt "Vector unaligned Accesses Support" + depends on RISCV_ISA_V + default RISCV_PROBE_VECTOR_UNALIGNED_ACCESS + help + This determines the level of support for vector unaligned accesses. This + information is used by the kernel to perform optimizations. It is also + exposed to user space via the hwprobe syscall. The hardware will be + probed at boot by default. + +config RISCV_PROBE_VECTOR_UNALIGNED_ACCESS + bool "Probe speed of vector unaligned accesses" + select RISCV_VECTOR_MISALIGNED + depends on RISCV_ISA_V + help + During boot, the kernel will run a series of tests to determine the + speed of vector unaligned accesses if they are supported. This probing + will dynamically determine the speed of vector unaligned accesses on + the underlying system if they are supported. + +endchoice + source "arch/riscv/Kconfig.vendor" endmenu # "Platform type" diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/cpufeature.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/cpufeature.h index ccc6cf141c20e..85bf1bce51e65 100644 --- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/cpufeature.h +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/cpufeature.h @@ -59,8 +59,8 @@ void riscv_user_isa_enable(void); #define __RISCV_ISA_EXT_SUPERSET_VALIDATE(_name, _id, _sub_exts, _validate) \ _RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA(_name, _id, _sub_exts, ARRAY_SIZE(_sub_exts), _validate) -#if defined(CONFIG_RISCV_SCALAR_MISALIGNED) bool check_unaligned_access_emulated_all_cpus(void); +#if defined(CONFIG_RISCV_SCALAR_MISALIGNED) void check_unaligned_access_emulated(struct work_struct *work __always_unused); void unaligned_emulation_finish(void); bool unaligned_ctl_available(void); @@ -72,6 +72,12 @@ static inline bool unaligned_ctl_available(void) } #endif +bool check_vector_unaligned_access_emulated_all_cpus(void); +#if defined(CONFIG_RISCV_VECTOR_MISALIGNED) +void check_vector_unaligned_access_emulated(struct work_struct *work __always_unused); +DECLARE_PER_CPU(long, vector_misaligned_access); +#endif + #if defined(CONFIG_RISCV_PROBE_UNALIGNED_ACCESS) DECLARE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(fast_unaligned_access_speed_key); diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/entry-common.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/entry-common.h index 0a4e3544c877a..7b32d2b08bb66 100644 --- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/entry-common.h +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/entry-common.h @@ -25,18 +25,7 @@ static inline void arch_exit_to_user_mode_prepare(struct pt_regs *regs, void handle_page_fault(struct pt_regs *regs); void handle_break(struct pt_regs *regs); -#ifdef CONFIG_RISCV_SCALAR_MISALIGNED int handle_misaligned_load(struct pt_regs *regs); int handle_misaligned_store(struct pt_regs *regs); -#else -static inline int handle_misaligned_load(struct pt_regs *regs) -{ - return -1; -} -static inline int handle_misaligned_store(struct pt_regs *regs) -{ - return -1; -} -#endif #endif /* _ASM_RISCV_ENTRY_COMMON_H */ diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/hwprobe.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/hwprobe.h index ffb9484531af7..1ce1df6d0ff3c 100644 --- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/hwprobe.h +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/hwprobe.h @@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ #include -#define RISCV_HWPROBE_MAX_KEY 9 +#define RISCV_HWPROBE_MAX_KEY 10 static inline bool riscv_hwprobe_key_is_valid(__s64 key) { diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/vector.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/vector.h index be7d309cca8a7..c7c023afbacd7 100644 --- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/vector.h +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/vector.h @@ -21,6 +21,7 @@ extern unsigned long riscv_v_vsize; int riscv_v_setup_vsize(void); +bool insn_is_vector(u32 insn_buf); bool riscv_v_first_use_handler(struct pt_regs *regs); void kernel_vector_begin(void); void kernel_vector_end(void); @@ -268,6 +269,7 @@ struct pt_regs; static inline int riscv_v_setup_vsize(void) { return -EOPNOTSUPP; } static __always_inline bool has_vector(void) { return false; } +static __always_inline bool insn_is_vector(u32 insn_buf) { return false; } static inline bool riscv_v_first_use_handler(struct pt_regs *regs) { return false; } static inline bool riscv_v_vstate_query(struct pt_regs *regs) { return false; } static inline bool riscv_v_vstate_ctrl_user_allowed(void) { return false; } diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/uapi/asm/hwprobe.h b/arch/riscv/include/uapi/asm/hwprobe.h index 1e153cda57db8..34c88c15322c5 100644 --- a/arch/riscv/include/uapi/asm/hwprobe.h +++ b/arch/riscv/include/uapi/asm/hwprobe.h @@ -88,6 +88,11 @@ struct riscv_hwprobe { #define RISCV_HWPROBE_MISALIGNED_SCALAR_SLOW 2 #define RISCV_HWPROBE_MISALIGNED_SCALAR_FAST 3 #define RISCV_HWPROBE_MISALIGNED_SCALAR_UNSUPPORTED 4 +#define RISCV_HWPROBE_KEY_MISALIGNED_VECTOR_PERF 10 +#define RISCV_HWPROBE_MISALIGNED_VECTOR_UNKNOWN 0 +#define RISCV_HWPROBE_MISALIGNED_VECTOR_SLOW 2 +#define RISCV_HWPROBE_MISALIGNED_VECTOR_FAST 3 +#define RISCV_HWPROBE_MISALIGNED_VECTOR_UNSUPPORTED 4 /* Increase RISCV_HWPROBE_MAX_KEY when adding items. */ /* Flags */ diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/Makefile b/arch/riscv/kernel/Makefile index 45624c5ea86c6..7f88cc4931f5c 100644 --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/Makefile +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/Makefile @@ -68,8 +68,8 @@ obj-y += probes/ obj-y += tests/ obj-$(CONFIG_MMU) += vdso.o vdso/ -obj-$(CONFIG_RISCV_SCALAR_MISALIGNED) += traps_misaligned.o -obj-$(CONFIG_RISCV_SCALAR_MISALIGNED) += unaligned_access_speed.o +obj-$(CONFIG_RISCV_MISALIGNED) += traps_misaligned.o +obj-$(CONFIG_RISCV_MISALIGNED) += unaligned_access_speed.o obj-$(CONFIG_RISCV_PROBE_UNALIGNED_ACCESS) += copy-unaligned.o obj-$(CONFIG_FPU) += fpu.o diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/sys_hwprobe.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/sys_hwprobe.c index cea0ca2bf2a25..6441baada36bc 100644 --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/sys_hwprobe.c +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/sys_hwprobe.c @@ -201,6 +201,37 @@ static u64 hwprobe_misaligned(const struct cpumask *cpus) } #endif +#ifdef CONFIG_RISCV_VECTOR_MISALIGNED +static u64 hwprobe_vec_misaligned(const struct cpumask *cpus) +{ + int cpu; + u64 perf = -1ULL; + + /* Return if supported or not even if speed wasn't probed */ + for_each_cpu(cpu, cpus) { + int this_perf = per_cpu(vector_misaligned_access, cpu); + + if (perf == -1ULL) + perf = this_perf; + + if (perf != this_perf) { + perf = RISCV_HWPROBE_MISALIGNED_VECTOR_UNKNOWN; + break; + } + } + + if (perf == -1ULL) + return RISCV_HWPROBE_MISALIGNED_VECTOR_UNKNOWN; + + return perf; +} +#else +static u64 hwprobe_vec_misaligned(const struct cpumask *cpus) +{ + return RISCV_HWPROBE_MISALIGNED_VECTOR_UNKNOWN; +} +#endif + static void hwprobe_one_pair(struct riscv_hwprobe *pair, const struct cpumask *cpus) { @@ -229,6 +260,10 @@ static void hwprobe_one_pair(struct riscv_hwprobe *pair, pair->value = hwprobe_misaligned(cpus); break; + case RISCV_HWPROBE_KEY_MISALIGNED_VECTOR_PERF: + pair->value = hwprobe_vec_misaligned(cpus); + break; + case RISCV_HWPROBE_KEY_ZICBOZ_BLOCK_SIZE: pair->value = 0; if (hwprobe_ext0_has(cpus, RISCV_HWPROBE_EXT_ZICBOZ)) diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/traps_misaligned.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/traps_misaligned.c index d076dde5ad204..ef59ecfc64cb5 100644 --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/traps_misaligned.c +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/traps_misaligned.c @@ -16,6 +16,7 @@ #include #include #include +#include #define INSN_MATCH_LB 0x3 #define INSN_MASK_LB 0x707f @@ -322,12 +323,37 @@ union reg_data { u64 data_u64; }; -static bool unaligned_ctl __read_mostly; - /* sysctl hooks */ int unaligned_enabled __read_mostly = 1; /* Enabled by default */ -int handle_misaligned_load(struct pt_regs *regs) +#ifdef CONFIG_RISCV_VECTOR_MISALIGNED +static int handle_vector_misaligned_load(struct pt_regs *regs) +{ + unsigned long epc = regs->epc; + unsigned long insn; + + if (get_insn(regs, epc, &insn)) + return -1; + + /* Only return 0 when in check_vector_unaligned_access_emulated */ + if (*this_cpu_ptr(&vector_misaligned_access) == RISCV_HWPROBE_MISALIGNED_VECTOR_UNKNOWN) { + *this_cpu_ptr(&vector_misaligned_access) = RISCV_HWPROBE_MISALIGNED_VECTOR_UNSUPPORTED; + regs->epc = epc + INSN_LEN(insn); + return 0; + } + + /* If vector instruction we don't emulate it yet */ + regs->epc = epc; + return -1; +} +#else +static int handle_vector_misaligned_load(struct pt_regs *regs) +{ + return -1; +} +#endif + +static int handle_scalar_misaligned_load(struct pt_regs *regs) { union reg_data val; unsigned long epc = regs->epc; @@ -435,7 +461,7 @@ int handle_misaligned_load(struct pt_regs *regs) return 0; } -int handle_misaligned_store(struct pt_regs *regs) +static int handle_scalar_misaligned_store(struct pt_regs *regs) { union reg_data val; unsigned long epc = regs->epc; @@ -526,6 +552,91 @@ int handle_misaligned_store(struct pt_regs *regs) return 0; } +int handle_misaligned_load(struct pt_regs *regs) +{ + unsigned long epc = regs->epc; + unsigned long insn; + + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RISCV_VECTOR_MISALIGNED)) { + if (get_insn(regs, epc, &insn)) + return -1; + + if (insn_is_vector(insn)) + return handle_vector_misaligned_load(regs); + } + + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RISCV_SCALAR_MISALIGNED)) + return handle_scalar_misaligned_load(regs); + + return -1; +} + +int handle_misaligned_store(struct pt_regs *regs) +{ + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RISCV_SCALAR_MISALIGNED)) + return handle_scalar_misaligned_store(regs); + + return -1; +} + +#ifdef CONFIG_RISCV_VECTOR_MISALIGNED +void check_vector_unaligned_access_emulated(struct work_struct *work __always_unused) +{ + long *mas_ptr = this_cpu_ptr(&vector_misaligned_access); + unsigned long tmp_var; + + *mas_ptr = RISCV_HWPROBE_MISALIGNED_VECTOR_UNKNOWN; + + kernel_vector_begin(); + /* + * In pre-13.0.0 versions of GCC, vector registers cannot appear in + * the clobber list. This inline asm clobbers v0, but since we do not + * currently build the kernel with V enabled, the v0 clobber arg is not + * needed (as the compiler will not emit vector code itself). If the kernel + * is changed to build with V enabled, the clobber arg will need to be + * added here. + */ + __asm__ __volatile__ ( + ".balign 4\n\t" + ".option push\n\t" + ".option arch, +zve32x\n\t" + " vsetivli zero, 1, e16, m1, ta, ma\n\t" // Vectors of 16b + " vle16.v v0, (%[ptr])\n\t" // Load bytes + ".option pop\n\t" + : : [ptr] "r" ((u8 *)&tmp_var + 1)); + kernel_vector_end(); +} + +bool check_vector_unaligned_access_emulated_all_cpus(void) +{ + int cpu; + + if (!has_vector()) { + for_each_online_cpu(cpu) + per_cpu(vector_misaligned_access, cpu) = RISCV_HWPROBE_MISALIGNED_VECTOR_UNSUPPORTED; + return false; + } + + schedule_on_each_cpu(check_vector_unaligned_access_emulated); + + for_each_online_cpu(cpu) + if (per_cpu(vector_misaligned_access, cpu) + == RISCV_HWPROBE_MISALIGNED_VECTOR_UNKNOWN) + return false; + + return true; +} +#else +bool check_vector_unaligned_access_emulated_all_cpus(void) +{ + return false; +} +#endif + +#ifdef CONFIG_RISCV_SCALAR_MISALIGNED + +static bool unaligned_ctl __read_mostly; + void check_unaligned_access_emulated(struct work_struct *work __always_unused) { int cpu = smp_processor_id(); @@ -574,3 +685,9 @@ bool unaligned_ctl_available(void) { return unaligned_ctl; } +#else +bool check_unaligned_access_emulated_all_cpus(void) +{ + return false; +} +#endif diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/unaligned_access_speed.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/unaligned_access_speed.c index f3508cc54f91a..0b8b5e17453a8 100644 --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/unaligned_access_speed.c +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/unaligned_access_speed.c @@ -19,7 +19,8 @@ #define MISALIGNED_BUFFER_ORDER get_order(MISALIGNED_BUFFER_SIZE) #define MISALIGNED_COPY_SIZE ((MISALIGNED_BUFFER_SIZE / 2) - 0x80) -DEFINE_PER_CPU(long, misaligned_access_speed); +DEFINE_PER_CPU(long, misaligned_access_speed) = RISCV_HWPROBE_MISALIGNED_SCALAR_UNKNOWN; +DEFINE_PER_CPU(long, vector_misaligned_access) = RISCV_HWPROBE_MISALIGNED_VECTOR_UNSUPPORTED; #ifdef CONFIG_RISCV_PROBE_UNALIGNED_ACCESS static cpumask_t fast_misaligned_access; @@ -260,23 +261,24 @@ static int check_unaligned_access_speed_all_cpus(void) kfree(bufs); return 0; } +#else /* CONFIG_RISCV_PROBE_UNALIGNED_ACCESS */ +static int check_unaligned_access_speed_all_cpus(void) +{ + return 0; +} +#endif static int check_unaligned_access_all_cpus(void) { - bool all_cpus_emulated = check_unaligned_access_emulated_all_cpus(); + bool all_cpus_emulated; + + all_cpus_emulated = check_unaligned_access_emulated_all_cpus(); + check_vector_unaligned_access_emulated_all_cpus(); if (!all_cpus_emulated) return check_unaligned_access_speed_all_cpus(); return 0; } -#else /* CONFIG_RISCV_PROBE_UNALIGNED_ACCESS */ -static int check_unaligned_access_all_cpus(void) -{ - check_unaligned_access_emulated_all_cpus(); - - return 0; -} -#endif arch_initcall(check_unaligned_access_all_cpus); diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/vector.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/vector.c index 682b3feee4511..821818886fab0 100644 --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/vector.c +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/vector.c @@ -66,7 +66,7 @@ void __init riscv_v_setup_ctx_cache(void) #endif } -static bool insn_is_vector(u32 insn_buf) +bool insn_is_vector(u32 insn_buf) { u32 opcode = insn_buf & __INSN_OPCODE_MASK; u32 width, csr; From e7c9d66e313bc0f7cb185c4972c3c9383a0da70f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jesse Taube Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2024 12:00:22 -0700 Subject: [PATCH 5/6] RISC-V: Report vector unaligned access speed hwprobe Detect if vector misaligned accesses are faster or slower than equivalent vector byte accesses. This is useful for usermode to know whether vector byte accesses or vector misaligned accesses have a better bandwidth for operations like memcpy. Signed-off-by: Jesse Taube Reviewed-by: Charlie Jenkins Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241017-jesse_unaligned_vector-v10-5-5b33500160f8@rivosinc.com Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt --- arch/riscv/Kconfig | 18 +++ arch/riscv/kernel/Makefile | 3 +- arch/riscv/kernel/copy-unaligned.h | 5 + arch/riscv/kernel/sys_hwprobe.c | 6 + arch/riscv/kernel/unaligned_access_speed.c | 141 ++++++++++++++++++++- arch/riscv/kernel/vec-copy-unaligned.S | 58 +++++++++ 6 files changed, 228 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) create mode 100644 arch/riscv/kernel/vec-copy-unaligned.S diff --git a/arch/riscv/Kconfig b/arch/riscv/Kconfig index 05f698a889777..d46394873afce 100644 --- a/arch/riscv/Kconfig +++ b/arch/riscv/Kconfig @@ -875,6 +875,24 @@ config RISCV_PROBE_VECTOR_UNALIGNED_ACCESS will dynamically determine the speed of vector unaligned accesses on the underlying system if they are supported. +config RISCV_SLOW_VECTOR_UNALIGNED_ACCESS + bool "Assume the system supports slow vector unaligned memory accesses" + depends on NONPORTABLE + help + Assume that the system supports slow vector unaligned memory accesses. The + kernel and userspace programs may not be able to run at all on systems + that do not support unaligned memory accesses. + +config RISCV_EFFICIENT_VECTOR_UNALIGNED_ACCESS + bool "Assume the system supports fast vector unaligned memory accesses" + depends on NONPORTABLE + help + Assume that the system supports fast vector unaligned memory accesses. When + enabled, this option improves the performance of the kernel on such + systems. However, the kernel and userspace programs will run much more + slowly, or will not be able to run at all, on systems that do not + support efficient unaligned memory accesses. + endchoice source "arch/riscv/Kconfig.vendor" diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/Makefile b/arch/riscv/kernel/Makefile index 7f88cc4931f5c..30db92672ada5 100644 --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/Makefile +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/Makefile @@ -70,7 +70,8 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_MMU) += vdso.o vdso/ obj-$(CONFIG_RISCV_MISALIGNED) += traps_misaligned.o obj-$(CONFIG_RISCV_MISALIGNED) += unaligned_access_speed.o -obj-$(CONFIG_RISCV_PROBE_UNALIGNED_ACCESS) += copy-unaligned.o +obj-$(CONFIG_RISCV_PROBE_UNALIGNED_ACCESS) += copy-unaligned.o +obj-$(CONFIG_RISCV_PROBE_VECTOR_UNALIGNED_ACCESS) += vec-copy-unaligned.o obj-$(CONFIG_FPU) += fpu.o obj-$(CONFIG_FPU) += kernel_mode_fpu.o diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/copy-unaligned.h b/arch/riscv/kernel/copy-unaligned.h index e3d70d35b7081..85d4d11450cb6 100644 --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/copy-unaligned.h +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/copy-unaligned.h @@ -10,4 +10,9 @@ void __riscv_copy_words_unaligned(void *dst, const void *src, size_t size); void __riscv_copy_bytes_unaligned(void *dst, const void *src, size_t size); +#ifdef CONFIG_RISCV_PROBE_VECTOR_UNALIGNED_ACCESS +void __riscv_copy_vec_words_unaligned(void *dst, const void *src, size_t size); +void __riscv_copy_vec_bytes_unaligned(void *dst, const void *src, size_t size); +#endif + #endif /* __RISCV_KERNEL_COPY_UNALIGNED_H */ diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/sys_hwprobe.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/sys_hwprobe.c index 6441baada36bc..6673278e84d58 100644 --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/sys_hwprobe.c +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/sys_hwprobe.c @@ -228,6 +228,12 @@ static u64 hwprobe_vec_misaligned(const struct cpumask *cpus) #else static u64 hwprobe_vec_misaligned(const struct cpumask *cpus) { + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RISCV_EFFICIENT_VECTOR_UNALIGNED_ACCESS)) + return RISCV_HWPROBE_MISALIGNED_VECTOR_FAST; + + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RISCV_SLOW_VECTOR_UNALIGNED_ACCESS)) + return RISCV_HWPROBE_MISALIGNED_VECTOR_SLOW; + return RISCV_HWPROBE_MISALIGNED_VECTOR_UNKNOWN; } #endif diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/unaligned_access_speed.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/unaligned_access_speed.c index 0b8b5e17453a8..91f189cf16113 100644 --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/unaligned_access_speed.c +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/unaligned_access_speed.c @@ -6,11 +6,13 @@ #include #include #include +#include #include #include #include #include #include +#include #include "copy-unaligned.h" @@ -268,12 +270,147 @@ static int check_unaligned_access_speed_all_cpus(void) } #endif +#ifdef CONFIG_RISCV_PROBE_VECTOR_UNALIGNED_ACCESS +static void check_vector_unaligned_access(struct work_struct *work __always_unused) +{ + int cpu = smp_processor_id(); + u64 start_cycles, end_cycles; + u64 word_cycles; + u64 byte_cycles; + int ratio; + unsigned long start_jiffies, now; + struct page *page; + void *dst; + void *src; + long speed = RISCV_HWPROBE_MISALIGNED_VECTOR_SLOW; + + if (per_cpu(vector_misaligned_access, cpu) != RISCV_HWPROBE_MISALIGNED_VECTOR_UNKNOWN) + return; + + page = alloc_pages(GFP_KERNEL, MISALIGNED_BUFFER_ORDER); + if (!page) { + pr_warn("Allocation failure, not measuring vector misaligned performance\n"); + return; + } + + /* Make an unaligned destination buffer. */ + dst = (void *)((unsigned long)page_address(page) | 0x1); + /* Unalign src as well, but differently (off by 1 + 2 = 3). */ + src = dst + (MISALIGNED_BUFFER_SIZE / 2); + src += 2; + word_cycles = -1ULL; + + /* Do a warmup. */ + kernel_vector_begin(); + __riscv_copy_vec_words_unaligned(dst, src, MISALIGNED_COPY_SIZE); + + start_jiffies = jiffies; + while ((now = jiffies) == start_jiffies) + cpu_relax(); + + /* + * For a fixed amount of time, repeatedly try the function, and take + * the best time in cycles as the measurement. + */ + while (time_before(jiffies, now + (1 << MISALIGNED_ACCESS_JIFFIES_LG2))) { + start_cycles = get_cycles64(); + /* Ensure the CSR read can't reorder WRT to the copy. */ + mb(); + __riscv_copy_vec_words_unaligned(dst, src, MISALIGNED_COPY_SIZE); + /* Ensure the copy ends before the end time is snapped. */ + mb(); + end_cycles = get_cycles64(); + if ((end_cycles - start_cycles) < word_cycles) + word_cycles = end_cycles - start_cycles; + } + + byte_cycles = -1ULL; + __riscv_copy_vec_bytes_unaligned(dst, src, MISALIGNED_COPY_SIZE); + start_jiffies = jiffies; + while ((now = jiffies) == start_jiffies) + cpu_relax(); + + while (time_before(jiffies, now + (1 << MISALIGNED_ACCESS_JIFFIES_LG2))) { + start_cycles = get_cycles64(); + /* Ensure the CSR read can't reorder WRT to the copy. */ + mb(); + __riscv_copy_vec_bytes_unaligned(dst, src, MISALIGNED_COPY_SIZE); + /* Ensure the copy ends before the end time is snapped. */ + mb(); + end_cycles = get_cycles64(); + if ((end_cycles - start_cycles) < byte_cycles) + byte_cycles = end_cycles - start_cycles; + } + + kernel_vector_end(); + + /* Don't divide by zero. */ + if (!word_cycles || !byte_cycles) { + pr_warn("cpu%d: rdtime lacks granularity needed to measure unaligned vector access speed\n", + cpu); + + return; + } + + if (word_cycles < byte_cycles) + speed = RISCV_HWPROBE_MISALIGNED_VECTOR_FAST; + + ratio = div_u64((byte_cycles * 100), word_cycles); + pr_info("cpu%d: Ratio of vector byte access time to vector unaligned word access is %d.%02d, unaligned accesses are %s\n", + cpu, + ratio / 100, + ratio % 100, + (speed == RISCV_HWPROBE_MISALIGNED_VECTOR_FAST) ? "fast" : "slow"); + + per_cpu(vector_misaligned_access, cpu) = speed; +} + +static int riscv_online_cpu_vec(unsigned int cpu) +{ + if (!has_vector()) + return 0; + + if (per_cpu(vector_misaligned_access, cpu) != RISCV_HWPROBE_MISALIGNED_VECTOR_UNSUPPORTED) + return 0; + + check_vector_unaligned_access_emulated(NULL); + check_vector_unaligned_access(NULL); + return 0; +} + +/* Measure unaligned access speed on all CPUs present at boot in parallel. */ +static int vec_check_unaligned_access_speed_all_cpus(void *unused __always_unused) +{ + schedule_on_each_cpu(check_vector_unaligned_access); + + /* + * Setup hotplug callbacks for any new CPUs that come online or go + * offline. + */ + cpuhp_setup_state_nocalls(CPUHP_AP_ONLINE_DYN, "riscv:online", + riscv_online_cpu_vec, NULL); + + return 0; +} +#else /* CONFIG_RISCV_PROBE_VECTOR_UNALIGNED_ACCESS */ +static int vec_check_unaligned_access_speed_all_cpus(void *unused __always_unused) +{ + return 0; +} +#endif + static int check_unaligned_access_all_cpus(void) { - bool all_cpus_emulated; + bool all_cpus_emulated, all_cpus_vec_unsupported; all_cpus_emulated = check_unaligned_access_emulated_all_cpus(); - check_vector_unaligned_access_emulated_all_cpus(); + all_cpus_vec_unsupported = check_vector_unaligned_access_emulated_all_cpus(); + + if (!all_cpus_vec_unsupported && + IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RISCV_PROBE_VECTOR_UNALIGNED_ACCESS)) { + kthread_run(vec_check_unaligned_access_speed_all_cpus, + NULL, "vec_check_unaligned_access_speed_all_cpus"); + } if (!all_cpus_emulated) return check_unaligned_access_speed_all_cpus(); diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/vec-copy-unaligned.S b/arch/riscv/kernel/vec-copy-unaligned.S new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000..d16f19f1b3b65 --- /dev/null +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/vec-copy-unaligned.S @@ -0,0 +1,58 @@ +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */ +/* Copyright (C) 2024 Rivos Inc. */ + +#include +#include +#include + + .text + +#define WORD_EEW 32 + +#define WORD_SEW CONCATENATE(e, WORD_EEW) +#define VEC_L CONCATENATE(vle, WORD_EEW).v +#define VEC_S CONCATENATE(vle, WORD_EEW).v + +/* void __riscv_copy_vec_words_unaligned(void *, const void *, size_t) */ +/* Performs a memcpy without aligning buffers, using word loads and stores. */ +/* Note: The size is truncated to a multiple of WORD_EEW */ +SYM_FUNC_START(__riscv_copy_vec_words_unaligned) + andi a4, a2, ~(WORD_EEW-1) + beqz a4, 2f + add a3, a1, a4 + .option push + .option arch, +zve32x +1: + vsetivli t0, 8, WORD_SEW, m8, ta, ma + VEC_L v0, (a1) + VEC_S v0, (a0) + addi a0, a0, WORD_EEW + addi a1, a1, WORD_EEW + bltu a1, a3, 1b + +2: + .option pop + ret +SYM_FUNC_END(__riscv_copy_vec_words_unaligned) + +/* void __riscv_copy_vec_bytes_unaligned(void *, const void *, size_t) */ +/* Performs a memcpy without aligning buffers, using only byte accesses. */ +/* Note: The size is truncated to a multiple of 8 */ +SYM_FUNC_START(__riscv_copy_vec_bytes_unaligned) + andi a4, a2, ~(8-1) + beqz a4, 2f + add a3, a1, a4 + .option push + .option arch, +zve32x +1: + vsetivli t0, 8, e8, m8, ta, ma + vle8.v v0, (a1) + vse8.v v0, (a0) + addi a0, a0, 8 + addi a1, a1, 8 + bltu a1, a3, 1b + +2: + .option pop + ret +SYM_FUNC_END(__riscv_copy_vec_bytes_unaligned) From 40e09ebd791fe6b872df49c4ae859451977e1e64 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jesse Taube Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2024 12:00:23 -0700 Subject: [PATCH 6/6] RISC-V: hwprobe: Document unaligned vector perf key Document key for reporting the speed of unaligned vector accesses. The descriptions are the same as the scalar equivalent values. Signed-off-by: Jesse Taube Reviewed-by: Charlie Jenkins Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241017-jesse_unaligned_vector-v10-6-5b33500160f8@rivosinc.com Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt --- Documentation/arch/riscv/hwprobe.rst | 16 ++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+) diff --git a/Documentation/arch/riscv/hwprobe.rst b/Documentation/arch/riscv/hwprobe.rst index 85b709257918a..ea4e0b9c73e74 100644 --- a/Documentation/arch/riscv/hwprobe.rst +++ b/Documentation/arch/riscv/hwprobe.rst @@ -274,3 +274,19 @@ The following keys are defined: represent the highest userspace virtual address usable. * :c:macro:`RISCV_HWPROBE_KEY_TIME_CSR_FREQ`: Frequency (in Hz) of `time CSR`. + +* :c:macro:`RISCV_HWPROBE_KEY_MISALIGNED_VECTOR_PERF`: An enum value describing the + performance of misaligned vector accesses on the selected set of processors. + + * :c:macro:`RISCV_HWPROBE_MISALIGNED_VECTOR_UNKNOWN`: The performance of misaligned + vector accesses is unknown. + + * :c:macro:`RISCV_HWPROBE_MISALIGNED_VECTOR_SLOW`: 32-bit misaligned accesses using vector + registers are slower than the equivalent quantity of byte accesses via vector registers. + Misaligned accesses may be supported directly in hardware, or trapped and emulated by software. + + * :c:macro:`RISCV_HWPROBE_MISALIGNED_VECTOR_FAST`: 32-bit misaligned accesses using vector + registers are faster than the equivalent quantity of byte accesses via vector registers. + + * :c:macro:`RISCV_HWPROBE_MISALIGNED_VECTOR_UNSUPPORTED`: Misaligned vector accesses are + not supported at all and will generate a misaligned address fault.