From 2de61538377c6d417c5c18e12309fe7bf098f2c9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Shay Drory Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2021 11:08:26 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] net/mlx5: Removing rmap per IRQ In next patches, IRQs will be requested according to demand, instead of statically on driver boot. Also, currently, rmap is managed by the IRQ layer. rmap management will move out from the IRQ layer in future patches. Therefore, we want to remove the IRQ from the rmap, when IRQ is destroyed, instead of removing all the IRQs from the rmap when irq_table is destroyed. Signed-off-by: Shay Drory Reviewed-by: Leon Romanovsky Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed --- .../net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/pci_irq.c | 17 ++++++++++++----- 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/pci_irq.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/pci_irq.c index 81b06b5693cdd..6a5a6ec0ddbfd 100644 --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/pci_irq.c +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/pci_irq.c @@ -154,8 +154,14 @@ static void irq_release(struct kref *kref) { struct mlx5_irq *irq = container_of(kref, struct mlx5_irq, kref); + /* free_irq requires that affinity and rmap will be cleared + * before calling it. This is why there is asymmetry with set_rmap + * which should be called after alloc_irq but before request_irq. + */ irq_set_affinity_hint(irq->irqn, NULL); free_cpumask_var(irq->mask); + /* this line is releasing this irq from the rmap */ + irq_set_affinity_notifier(irq->irqn, NULL); free_irq(irq->irqn, &irq->nh); } @@ -378,6 +384,11 @@ int mlx5_irq_table_create(struct mlx5_core_dev *dev) return err; } +static void irq_table_clear_rmap(struct mlx5_irq_table *table) +{ + cpu_rmap_put(table->rmap); +} + void mlx5_irq_table_destroy(struct mlx5_core_dev *dev) { struct mlx5_irq_table *table = dev->priv.irq_table; @@ -386,11 +397,7 @@ void mlx5_irq_table_destroy(struct mlx5_core_dev *dev) if (mlx5_core_is_sf(dev)) return; - /* free_irq requires that affinity and rmap will be cleared - * before calling it. This is why there is asymmetry with set_rmap - * which should be called after alloc_irq but before request_irq. - */ - irq_clear_rmap(dev); + irq_table_clear_rmap(table); for (i = 0; i < table->nvec; i++) irq_release(&mlx5_irq_get(dev, i)->kref); pci_free_irq_vectors(dev->pdev);