From 587b839de733a8cdef3cbb805014e05229e7c96b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2021 15:28:47 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] ice: remove redundant continue statement in a for-loop
The continue statement in the for-loop is redundant. Re-work the hw_lock
check to remove it.
Addresses-Coverity: ("Continue has no effect")
Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
Reviewed-by: Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_ptp_hw.c | 10 ++++------
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_ptp_hw.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_ptp_hw.c
index 267312fad59a0..3eca0e4eab0be 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_ptp_hw.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_ptp_hw.c
@@ -410,13 +410,11 @@ bool ice_ptp_lock(struct ice_hw *hw)
for (i = 0; i < MAX_TRIES; i++) {
hw_lock = rd32(hw, PFTSYN_SEM + (PFTSYN_SEM_BYTES * hw->pf_id));
hw_lock = hw_lock & PFTSYN_SEM_BUSY_M;
- if (hw_lock) {
- /* Somebody is holding the lock */
- usleep_range(10000, 20000);
- continue;
- } else {
+ if (!hw_lock)
break;
- }
+
+ /* Somebody is holding the lock */
+ usleep_range(10000, 20000);
}
return !hw_lock;