From 5cbdaeefb655072d304744812708b3f3a31c6b51 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Thiago Jung Bauermann Date: Tue, 6 Aug 2019 01:49:19 -0300 Subject: [PATCH] s390/mm: Remove sev_active() function All references to sev_active() were moved to arch/x86 so we don't need to define it for s390 anymore. Signed-off-by: Thiago Jung Bauermann Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig Reviewed-by: Halil Pasic Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190806044919.10622-7-bauerman@linux.ibm.com --- arch/s390/include/asm/mem_encrypt.h | 1 - arch/s390/mm/init.c | 7 +------ 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 7 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/s390/include/asm/mem_encrypt.h b/arch/s390/include/asm/mem_encrypt.h index ff813a56bc300..2542cbf7e2d18 100644 --- a/arch/s390/include/asm/mem_encrypt.h +++ b/arch/s390/include/asm/mem_encrypt.h @@ -5,7 +5,6 @@ #ifndef __ASSEMBLY__ static inline bool mem_encrypt_active(void) { return false; } -extern bool sev_active(void); int set_memory_encrypted(unsigned long addr, int numpages); int set_memory_decrypted(unsigned long addr, int numpages); diff --git a/arch/s390/mm/init.c b/arch/s390/mm/init.c index 20340a03ad90c..a124f19f7b3cc 100644 --- a/arch/s390/mm/init.c +++ b/arch/s390/mm/init.c @@ -156,14 +156,9 @@ int set_memory_decrypted(unsigned long addr, int numpages) } /* are we a protected virtualization guest? */ -bool sev_active(void) -{ - return is_prot_virt_guest(); -} - bool force_dma_unencrypted(struct device *dev) { - return sev_active(); + return is_prot_virt_guest(); } /* protected virtualization */