From 66606567dedf395e0857f531976efad4cbbd39ea Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Charles Haithcock <chaithco@redhat.com>
Date: Sun, 1 Nov 2020 17:07:56 -0800
Subject: [PATCH] mm, oom: keep oom_adj under or at upper limit when printing

For oom_score_adj values in the range [942,999], the current
calculations will print 16 for oom_adj.  This patch simply limits the
output so output is inline with docs.

Signed-off-by: Charles Haithcock <chaithco@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201020165130.33927-1-chaithco@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
---
 fs/proc/base.c | 2 ++
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

diff --git a/fs/proc/base.c b/fs/proc/base.c
index 0f707003dda53..b362523a9829a 100644
--- a/fs/proc/base.c
+++ b/fs/proc/base.c
@@ -1049,6 +1049,8 @@ static ssize_t oom_adj_read(struct file *file, char __user *buf, size_t count,
 		oom_adj = (task->signal->oom_score_adj * -OOM_DISABLE) /
 			  OOM_SCORE_ADJ_MAX;
 	put_task_struct(task);
+	if (oom_adj > OOM_ADJUST_MAX)
+		oom_adj = OOM_ADJUST_MAX;
 	len = snprintf(buffer, sizeof(buffer), "%d\n", oom_adj);
 	return simple_read_from_buffer(buf, count, ppos, buffer, len);
 }