From 672c368f9398042b629740cc9816e8e939eff2db Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Chris Wilson Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2020 18:47:52 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] drm/i915: Keep track of request among the scheduling lists If we keep track of when the i915_request.sched.link is on the HW runlist, or in the priority queue we can simplify our interactions with the request (such as during rescheduling). This also simplifies the next patch where we introduce a new in-between list, for requests that are ready but neither on the run list or in the queue. v2: Update i915_sched_node.link explanation for current usage where it is a link on both the queue and on the runlists. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson Cc: Mika Kuoppala Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200116184754.2860848-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.c | 13 ++++++++----- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c | 4 +++- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.h | 17 +++++++++++++++++ drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_scheduler.c | 22 ++++++++++------------ 4 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.c index 999fe82190da8..4cd88019fc2df 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.c @@ -985,6 +985,8 @@ __unwind_incomplete_requests(struct intel_engine_cs *engine) GEM_BUG_ON(RB_EMPTY_ROOT(&engine->execlists.queue.rb_root)); list_move(&rq->sched.link, pl); + set_bit(I915_FENCE_FLAG_PQUEUE, &rq->fence.flags); + active = rq; } else { struct intel_engine_cs *owner = rq->context->engine; @@ -2431,11 +2433,12 @@ static void execlists_preempt(struct timer_list *timer) } static void queue_request(struct intel_engine_cs *engine, - struct i915_sched_node *node, - int prio) + struct i915_request *rq) { - GEM_BUG_ON(!list_empty(&node->link)); - list_add_tail(&node->link, i915_sched_lookup_priolist(engine, prio)); + GEM_BUG_ON(!list_empty(&rq->sched.link)); + list_add_tail(&rq->sched.link, + i915_sched_lookup_priolist(engine, rq_prio(rq))); + set_bit(I915_FENCE_FLAG_PQUEUE, &rq->fence.flags); } static void __submit_queue_imm(struct intel_engine_cs *engine) @@ -2471,7 +2474,7 @@ static void execlists_submit_request(struct i915_request *request) /* Will be called from irq-context when using foreign fences. */ spin_lock_irqsave(&engine->active.lock, flags); - queue_request(engine, &request->sched, rq_prio(request)); + queue_request(engine, request); GEM_BUG_ON(RB_EMPTY_ROOT(&engine->execlists.queue.rb_root)); GEM_BUG_ON(list_empty(&request->sched.link)); diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c index be185886e4fcc..9ed0d3bc72495 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c @@ -408,8 +408,10 @@ bool __i915_request_submit(struct i915_request *request) xfer: /* We may be recursing from the signal callback of another i915 fence */ spin_lock_nested(&request->lock, SINGLE_DEPTH_NESTING); - if (!test_and_set_bit(I915_FENCE_FLAG_ACTIVE, &request->fence.flags)) + if (!test_and_set_bit(I915_FENCE_FLAG_ACTIVE, &request->fence.flags)) { list_move_tail(&request->sched.link, &engine->active.requests); + clear_bit(I915_FENCE_FLAG_PQUEUE, &request->fence.flags); + } if (test_bit(DMA_FENCE_FLAG_ENABLE_SIGNAL_BIT, &request->fence.flags) && !test_bit(DMA_FENCE_FLAG_SIGNALED_BIT, &request->fence.flags) && diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.h index 031433691a06f..6f5bbfa95513c 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.h +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.h @@ -70,6 +70,18 @@ enum { */ I915_FENCE_FLAG_ACTIVE = DMA_FENCE_FLAG_USER_BITS, + /* + * I915_FENCE_FLAG_PQUEUE - this request is ready for execution + * + * Using the scheduler, when a request is ready for execution it is put + * into the priority queue, and removed from that queue when transferred + * to the HW runlists. We want to track its membership within the + * priority queue so that we can easily check before rescheduling. + * + * See i915_request_in_priority_queue() + */ + I915_FENCE_FLAG_PQUEUE, + /* * I915_FENCE_FLAG_SIGNAL - this request is currently on signal_list * @@ -361,6 +373,11 @@ static inline bool i915_request_is_active(const struct i915_request *rq) return test_bit(I915_FENCE_FLAG_ACTIVE, &rq->fence.flags); } +static inline bool i915_request_in_priority_queue(const struct i915_request *rq) +{ + return test_bit(I915_FENCE_FLAG_PQUEUE, &rq->fence.flags); +} + /** * Returns true if seq1 is later than seq2. */ diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_scheduler.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_scheduler.c index bf87c70bfdd96..5d96cfba40f88 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_scheduler.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_scheduler.c @@ -326,20 +326,18 @@ static void __i915_schedule(struct i915_sched_node *node, node->attr.priority = prio; - if (list_empty(&node->link)) { - /* - * If the request is not in the priolist queue because - * it is not yet runnable, then it doesn't contribute - * to our preemption decisions. On the other hand, - * if the request is on the HW, it too is not in the - * queue; but in that case we may still need to reorder - * the inflight requests. - */ + /* + * Once the request is ready, it will be placed into the + * priority lists and then onto the HW runlist. Before the + * request is ready, it does not contribute to our preemption + * decisions and we can safely ignore it, as it will, and + * any preemption required, be dealt with upon submission. + * See engine->submit_request() + */ + if (list_empty(&node->link)) continue; - } - if (!intel_engine_is_virtual(engine) && - !i915_request_is_active(node_to_request(node))) { + if (i915_request_in_priority_queue(node_to_request(node))) { if (!cache.priolist) cache.priolist = i915_sched_lookup_priolist(engine,