From 7a68b55ff39b0a1638acb1694c185d49f6077a0d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Mark Rutland Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2025 18:05:25 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] KVM: arm64: Initialize HCR_EL2.E2H early On CPUs without FEAT_E2H0, HCR_EL2.E2H is RES1, but may reset to an UNKNOWN value out of reset and consequently may not read as 1 unless it has been explicitly initialized. We handled this for the head.S boot code in commits: 3944382fa6f22b54 ("arm64: Treat HCR_EL2.E2H as RES1 when ID_AA64MMFR4_EL1.E2H0 is negative") b3320142f3db9b3f ("arm64: Fix early handling of FEAT_E2H0 not being implemented") Unfortunately, we forgot to apply a similar fix to the KVM PSCI entry points used when relaying CPU_ON, CPU_SUSPEND, and SYSTEM SUSPEND. When KVM is entered via these entry points, the value of HCR_EL2.E2H may be consumed before it has been initialized (e.g. by the 'init_el2_state' macro). Initialize HCR_EL2.E2H early in these paths such that it can be consumed reliably. The existing code in head.S is factored out into a new 'init_el2_hcr' macro, and this is used in the __kvm_hyp_init_cpu() function common to all the relevant PSCI entry points. For clarity, I've tweaked the assembly used to check whether ID_AA64MMFR4_EL1.E2H0 is negative. The bitfield is extracted as a signed value, and this is checked with a signed-greater-or-equal (GE) comparison. As the hyp code will reconfigure HCR_EL2 later in ___kvm_hyp_init(), all bits other than E2H are initialized to zero in __kvm_hyp_init_cpu(). Fixes: 3944382fa6f22b54 ("arm64: Treat HCR_EL2.E2H as RES1 when ID_AA64MMFR4_EL1.E2H0 is negative") Fixes: b3320142f3db9b3f ("arm64: Fix early handling of FEAT_E2H0 not being implemented") Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland Cc: Ahmed Genidi Cc: Ben Horgan Cc: Catalin Marinas Cc: Leo Yan Cc: Marc Zyngier Cc: Oliver Upton Cc: Will Deacon Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250227180526.1204723-2-mark.rutland@arm.com [maz: fixed LT->GE thinko] Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier --- arch/arm64/include/asm/el2_setup.h | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++ arch/arm64/kernel/head.S | 19 +------------------ arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/hyp-init.S | 8 +++++++- 3 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/el2_setup.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/el2_setup.h index 25e1626517500..56034a394b437 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/el2_setup.h +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/el2_setup.h @@ -16,6 +16,32 @@ #include #include +.macro init_el2_hcr val + mov_q x0, \val + + /* + * Compliant CPUs advertise their VHE-onlyness with + * ID_AA64MMFR4_EL1.E2H0 < 0. On such CPUs HCR_EL2.E2H is RES1, but it + * can reset into an UNKNOWN state and might not read as 1 until it has + * been initialized explicitly. + * + * Fruity CPUs seem to have HCR_EL2.E2H set to RAO/WI, but + * don't advertise it (they predate this relaxation). + * + * Initalize HCR_EL2.E2H so that later code can rely upon HCR_EL2.E2H + * indicating whether the CPU is running in E2H mode. + */ + mrs_s x1, SYS_ID_AA64MMFR4_EL1 + sbfx x1, x1, #ID_AA64MMFR4_EL1_E2H0_SHIFT, #ID_AA64MMFR4_EL1_E2H0_WIDTH + cmp x1, #0 + b.ge .LnVHE_\@ + + orr x0, x0, #HCR_E2H +.LnVHE_\@: + msr hcr_el2, x0 + isb +.endm + .macro __init_el2_sctlr mov_q x0, INIT_SCTLR_EL2_MMU_OFF msr sctlr_el2, x0 diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/head.S b/arch/arm64/kernel/head.S index 5ab1970ee5436..2d56459d6c94c 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/head.S +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/head.S @@ -298,25 +298,8 @@ SYM_INNER_LABEL(init_el2, SYM_L_LOCAL) msr sctlr_el2, x0 isb 0: - mov_q x0, HCR_HOST_NVHE_FLAGS - - /* - * Compliant CPUs advertise their VHE-onlyness with - * ID_AA64MMFR4_EL1.E2H0 < 0. HCR_EL2.E2H can be - * RES1 in that case. Publish the E2H bit early so that - * it can be picked up by the init_el2_state macro. - * - * Fruity CPUs seem to have HCR_EL2.E2H set to RAO/WI, but - * don't advertise it (they predate this relaxation). - */ - mrs_s x1, SYS_ID_AA64MMFR4_EL1 - tbz x1, #(ID_AA64MMFR4_EL1_E2H0_SHIFT + ID_AA64MMFR4_EL1_E2H0_WIDTH - 1), 1f - - orr x0, x0, #HCR_E2H -1: - msr hcr_el2, x0 - isb + init_el2_hcr HCR_HOST_NVHE_FLAGS init_el2_state /* Hypervisor stub */ diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/hyp-init.S b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/hyp-init.S index fc18662260676..3fb5504a7d7fc 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/hyp-init.S +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/hyp-init.S @@ -73,8 +73,12 @@ __do_hyp_init: eret SYM_CODE_END(__kvm_hyp_init) +/* + * Initialize EL2 CPU state to sane values. + * + * HCR_EL2.E2H must have been initialized already. + */ SYM_CODE_START_LOCAL(__kvm_init_el2_state) - /* Initialize EL2 CPU state to sane values. */ init_el2_state // Clobbers x0..x2 finalise_el2_state ret @@ -206,6 +210,8 @@ SYM_CODE_START_LOCAL(__kvm_hyp_init_cpu) 2: msr SPsel, #1 // We want to use SP_EL{1,2} + init_el2_hcr 0 + bl __kvm_init_el2_state __init_el2_nvhe_prepare_eret