Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
sis900: Allocate rx replacement buffer before rx operation
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history
	The sis900 driver appears to have a bug in which the receive routine
passes the skbuff holding the received frame to the network stack before
refilling the buffer in the rx ring.  If a new skbuff cannot be allocated, the
driver simply leaves a hole in the rx ring, which causes the driver to stop
receiving frames and become non-recoverable without an rmmod/insmod according to
reporters.  This patch reverses that order, attempting to allocate a replacement
buffer first, and receiving the new frame only if one can be allocated.  If no
skbuff can be allocated, the current skbuf in the rx ring is recycled, dropping
the current frame, but keeping the NIC operational.

Signed-off-by: Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>
Signed-off-by: Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>
  • Loading branch information
Neil Horman authored and Jeff Garzik committed Apr 24, 2007
1 parent d91c088 commit b748d9e
Showing 1 changed file with 20 additions and 24 deletions.
44 changes: 20 additions & 24 deletions drivers/net/sis900.c
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -1755,6 +1755,24 @@ static int sis900_rx(struct net_device *net_dev)
} else {
struct sk_buff * skb;

pci_unmap_single(sis_priv->pci_dev,
sis_priv->rx_ring[entry].bufptr, RX_BUF_SIZE,
PCI_DMA_FROMDEVICE);

/* refill the Rx buffer, what if there is not enought
* memory for new socket buffer ?? */
if ((skb = dev_alloc_skb(RX_BUF_SIZE)) == NULL) {
/*
* Not enough memory to refill the buffer
* so we need to recycle the old one so
* as to avoid creating a memory hole
* in the rx ring
*/
skb = sis_priv->rx_skbuff[entry];
sis_priv->stats.rx_dropped++;
goto refill_rx_ring;
}

/* This situation should never happen, but due to
some unknow bugs, it is possible that
we are working on NULL sk_buff :-( */
Expand All @@ -1768,9 +1786,6 @@ static int sis900_rx(struct net_device *net_dev)
break;
}

pci_unmap_single(sis_priv->pci_dev,
sis_priv->rx_ring[entry].bufptr, RX_BUF_SIZE,
PCI_DMA_FROMDEVICE);
/* give the socket buffer to upper layers */
skb = sis_priv->rx_skbuff[entry];
skb_put(skb, rx_size);
Expand All @@ -1783,33 +1798,14 @@ static int sis900_rx(struct net_device *net_dev)
net_dev->last_rx = jiffies;
sis_priv->stats.rx_bytes += rx_size;
sis_priv->stats.rx_packets++;

/* refill the Rx buffer, what if there is not enought
* memory for new socket buffer ?? */
if ((skb = dev_alloc_skb(RX_BUF_SIZE)) == NULL) {
/* not enough memory for skbuff, this makes a
* "hole" on the buffer ring, it is not clear
* how the hardware will react to this kind
* of degenerated buffer */
if (netif_msg_rx_status(sis_priv))
printk(KERN_INFO "%s: Memory squeeze,"
"deferring packet.\n",
net_dev->name);
sis_priv->rx_skbuff[entry] = NULL;
/* reset buffer descriptor state */
sis_priv->rx_ring[entry].cmdsts = 0;
sis_priv->rx_ring[entry].bufptr = 0;
sis_priv->stats.rx_dropped++;
sis_priv->cur_rx++;
break;
}
sis_priv->dirty_rx++;
refill_rx_ring:
skb->dev = net_dev;
sis_priv->rx_skbuff[entry] = skb;
sis_priv->rx_ring[entry].cmdsts = RX_BUF_SIZE;
sis_priv->rx_ring[entry].bufptr =
pci_map_single(sis_priv->pci_dev, skb->data,
RX_BUF_SIZE, PCI_DMA_FROMDEVICE);
sis_priv->dirty_rx++;
}
sis_priv->cur_rx++;
entry = sis_priv->cur_rx % NUM_RX_DESC;
Expand Down

0 comments on commit b748d9e

Please sign in to comment.