From b7ce436a5d798bc59e71797952566608a4b4626b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Desmond Cheong Zhi Xi Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2021 12:14:09 +0800 Subject: [PATCH] Bluetooth: switch to lock_sock in RFCOMM Other than rfcomm_sk_state_change and rfcomm_connect_ind, functions in RFCOMM use lock_sock to lock the socket. Since bh_lock_sock and spin_lock_bh do not provide synchronization with lock_sock, these calls should be changed to lock_sock. This is now safe to do because packet processing is now done in a workqueue instead of a tasklet, so bh_lock_sock/spin_lock_bh are no longer necessary to synchronise between user contexts and SOFTIRQ processing. Signed-off-by: Desmond Cheong Zhi Xi Signed-off-by: Luiz Augusto von Dentz --- net/bluetooth/rfcomm/sock.c | 8 ++++---- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/net/bluetooth/rfcomm/sock.c b/net/bluetooth/rfcomm/sock.c index ae6f807305617..2c95bb58f901a 100644 --- a/net/bluetooth/rfcomm/sock.c +++ b/net/bluetooth/rfcomm/sock.c @@ -70,7 +70,7 @@ static void rfcomm_sk_state_change(struct rfcomm_dlc *d, int err) BT_DBG("dlc %p state %ld err %d", d, d->state, err); - spin_lock_bh(&sk->sk_lock.slock); + lock_sock(sk); if (err) sk->sk_err = err; @@ -91,7 +91,7 @@ static void rfcomm_sk_state_change(struct rfcomm_dlc *d, int err) sk->sk_state_change(sk); } - spin_unlock_bh(&sk->sk_lock.slock); + release_sock(sk); if (parent && sock_flag(sk, SOCK_ZAPPED)) { /* We have to drop DLC lock here, otherwise @@ -974,7 +974,7 @@ int rfcomm_connect_ind(struct rfcomm_session *s, u8 channel, struct rfcomm_dlc * if (!parent) return 0; - bh_lock_sock(parent); + lock_sock(parent); /* Check for backlog size */ if (sk_acceptq_is_full(parent)) { @@ -1001,7 +1001,7 @@ int rfcomm_connect_ind(struct rfcomm_session *s, u8 channel, struct rfcomm_dlc * result = 1; done: - bh_unlock_sock(parent); + release_sock(parent); if (test_bit(BT_SK_DEFER_SETUP, &bt_sk(parent)->flags)) parent->sk_state_change(parent);