From d5286a92ea76a124d6cfa1e261394da858125d99 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2020 13:24:02 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] btrfs: remove useless return value statement in split_node

At the point when we set 'ret = 0' it's guaranteed that the function is
going to return 0 so directly return 0. No functional changes.

Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
---
 fs/btrfs/ctree.c | 3 +--
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/btrfs/ctree.c b/fs/btrfs/ctree.c
index 778a6d580545b..60135f6e64410 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/ctree.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/ctree.c
@@ -3459,7 +3459,6 @@ static noinline int split_node(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
 			   (c_nritems - mid) * sizeof(struct btrfs_key_ptr));
 	btrfs_set_header_nritems(split, c_nritems - mid);
 	btrfs_set_header_nritems(c, mid);
-	ret = 0;
 
 	btrfs_mark_buffer_dirty(c);
 	btrfs_mark_buffer_dirty(split);
@@ -3477,7 +3476,7 @@ static noinline int split_node(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
 		btrfs_tree_unlock(split);
 		free_extent_buffer(split);
 	}
-	return ret;
+	return 0;
 }
 
 /*