Permalink
Cannot retrieve contributors at this time
Name already in use
A tag already exists with the provided branch name. Many Git commands accept both tag and branch names, so creating this branch may cause unexpected behavior. Are you sure you want to create this branch?
CoNekT/docs/tutorials/004_compare_specificity.md
Go to fileThis commit does not belong to any branch on this repository, and may belong to a fork outside of the repository.
37 lines (24 sloc)
2.06 KB
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
# Tutorial: Compare Specificity | |
Tissue specificity can be combined with gene families to pick up genes with conserved expression between species but | |
also to detect genes within one species that sub- or neo-functionalized after duplication. Look at the examples below to | |
see how. | |
## Conserved Expression | |
Some low-abudant genes can cause false positives when looking for tissue/condition specificity. These adverse results can | |
be greatly reduced by looking for genes that are specific in a certain tissue in one species and have an ortholog | |
(or homolog) specifically for the corresponding tissue is another species. | |
In this example *Arabidopsis thaliana* silique specific genes are matched with their orthologs expressed specifically in | |
Tomato (*Solanum lycopersicum*) fruis. This feature is available from the tools menu below the button | |
**Compare specificity**. The SPM (Specificity Metric) slider for tomato is adjusted to yield a similar number of hits | |
as in *Arabidopsis thaliana*. | |
![Compare specificity entry](images/compare_specificity_entry.png "Compare specificity entry") | |
In the resulting page orthogroups with a member expressed in one, the other or both selected conditions are shown in a | |
venn diagram, with a detailed list below. By hovering over a gene, the description can be observed. | |
![Compare specificity result](images/compare_specificity_result.png "Compare specificity result") | |
Here, the first reported hit is AGL1 *aka.* SHATTERPROOF 1, a known | |
[fruit development gene](https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10903201), clearly illustrating the power of this approach. | |
## Sub- or Neofunctionalization | |
Similarly you can compare *Arabidopsis thaliana* root specific genes (default SPM of 0.85) with pollen in the same | |
species (using the same SPM cutoff). | |
![Compare specificity result2](images/compare_specificity_result2.png "Compare specificity result2") | |
Here **74** orthogroups are reported to show signs of sub- or neo-functionalization. This includes | |
**Cellulose Synthase (like)** genes included in the example from the [previous section](004_compare_specificity.md). | |