Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
Documentation: merge-output is not too verbose now.
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history
We've squelched output from merge-recursive, and git-merge when
used with recursive does not attempt the trivial one first
anymore, so there won't be "Trying ... Nope." messages now.

Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
  • Loading branch information
Junio C Hamano committed Jan 15, 2007
1 parent e7eb503 commit 5fe3acc
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Showing 2 changed files with 2 additions and 11 deletions.
9 changes: 2 additions & 7 deletions Documentation/core-tutorial.txt
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -906,18 +906,13 @@ of it as it can automatically (which in this case is just merge the `example`
file, which had no differences in the `mybranch` branch), and say:

----------------
Trying really trivial in-index merge...
fatal: Merge requires file-level merging
Nope.
...
Auto-merging hello
CONFLICT (content): Merge conflict in hello
Automatic merge failed; fix up by hand
----------------

which is way too verbose, but it basically tells you that it failed the
really trivial merge ("Simple merge") and did an "Automatic merge"
instead, but that too failed due to conflicts in `hello`.
It tells you that it did an "Automatic merge", which
failed due to conflicts in `hello`.

Not to worry. It left the (trivial) conflict in `hello` in the same form you
should already be well used to if you've ever used CVS, so let's just
Expand Down
4 changes: 0 additions & 4 deletions Documentation/git-reset.txt
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -121,10 +121,6 @@ Undo a merge or pull::
+
------------
$ git pull <1>
Trying really trivial in-index merge...
fatal: Merge requires file-level merging
Nope.
...
Auto-merging nitfol
CONFLICT (content): Merge conflict in nitfol
Automatic merge failed/prevented; fix up by hand
Expand Down

0 comments on commit 5fe3acc

Please sign in to comment.