Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
Versioning scheme changes.
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history
HPA suggests it is simply silly to imitate Linux versioning
scheme where the leading "2" does not mean anything anymore, and
I tend to agree.

The first feature release after 1.0.0 will be 1.1.0, and the
development path leading to 1.1.0 will carry 1.0.GIT as the
version number from now on.  Similarly, the third maintenance
release that follows 1.0.0 will not be 1.0.0c as planned, but
will be called 1.0.3.  The "maint" branch will merge in fixes
and immediately tagged, so there is no need for 1.0.2.GIT that
is in between 1.0.2 (aka 1.0.0b) and 1.0.3.

Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
  • Loading branch information
Junio C Hamano committed Dec 22, 2005
1 parent 2a21274 commit c894168
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Showing 2 changed files with 7 additions and 1 deletion.
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion Makefile
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -55,7 +55,7 @@ all:
# Define USE_STDEV below if you want git to care about the underlying device
# change being considered an inode change from the update-cache perspective.

GIT_VERSION = 1.0.0.GIT
GIT_VERSION = 1.0.GIT

# CFLAGS and LDFLAGS are for the users to override from the command line.

Expand Down
6 changes: 6 additions & 0 deletions debian/changelog
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -1,3 +1,9 @@
git-core (1.0.GIT-0) unstable; urgency=low

* Post GIT 1.0 development track.

-- Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net> Wed, 21 Dec 2005 22:28:33 -0800

git-core (1.0.0.GIT-0) unstable; urgency=low

* Post GIT 1.0.0 development track.
Expand Down

0 comments on commit c894168

Please sign in to comment.