KVM: emulator: remove code duplication in register_address{,_increment}

register_address has been a duplicate of address_mask ever since the
ancestor of __linearize was born in 90de84f (KVM: x86 emulator:
preserve an operand's segment identity, 2010-11-17).

However, we can put it to a better use by including the call to reg_read
in register_address.  Similarly, the call to reg_rmw can be moved to
register_address_increment.

Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>

arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c

@@ -488,9 +488,9 @@ address_mask(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt, unsigned long reg)
 }
 
 static inline unsigned long
-register_address(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt, unsigned long reg)
+register_address(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt, int reg)
 {
-	return address_mask(ctxt, reg);
+	return address_mask(ctxt, reg_read(ctxt, reg));
 }
 
 static void masked_increment(ulong *reg, ulong mask, int inc)
@@ -499,15 +499,15 @@ static void masked_increment(ulong *reg, ulong mask, int inc)
 }
 
 static inline void
-register_address_increment(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt, unsigned long *reg, int inc)
+register_address_increment(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt, int reg, int inc)
 {
 	ulong mask;
 
 	if (ctxt->ad_bytes == sizeof(unsigned long))
 		mask = ~0UL;
 	else
 		mask = ad_mask(ctxt);
-	masked_increment(reg, mask, inc);
+	masked_increment(reg_rmw(ctxt, reg), mask, inc);
 }
 
 static void rsp_increment(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt, int inc)
@@ -2910,8 +2910,8 @@ static void string_addr_inc(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt, int reg,
 {
 	int df = (ctxt->eflags & EFLG_DF) ? -op->count : op->count;
 
-	register_address_increment(ctxt, reg_rmw(ctxt, reg), df * op->bytes);
-	op->addr.mem.ea = register_address(ctxt, reg_read(ctxt, reg));
+	register_address_increment(ctxt, reg, df * op->bytes);
+	op->addr.mem.ea = register_address(ctxt, reg);
 }
 
 static int em_das(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt)
@@ -3381,7 +3381,7 @@ static int em_loop(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt)
 {
 	int rc = X86EMUL_CONTINUE;
 
-	register_address_increment(ctxt, reg_rmw(ctxt, VCPU_REGS_RCX), -1);
+	register_address_increment(ctxt, VCPU_REGS_RCX, -1);
 	if ((address_mask(ctxt, reg_read(ctxt, VCPU_REGS_RCX)) != 0) &&
 	    (ctxt->b == 0xe2 || test_cc(ctxt->b ^ 0x5, ctxt->eflags)))
 		rc = jmp_rel(ctxt, ctxt->src.val);
@@ -4280,7 +4280,7 @@ static int decode_operand(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt, struct operand *op,
 		op->type = OP_MEM;
 		op->bytes = (ctxt->d & ByteOp) ? 1 : ctxt->op_bytes;
 		op->addr.mem.ea =
-			register_address(ctxt, reg_read(ctxt, VCPU_REGS_RDI));
+			register_address(ctxt, VCPU_REGS_RDI);
 		op->addr.mem.seg = VCPU_SREG_ES;
 		op->val = 0;
 		op->count = 1;
@@ -4332,7 +4332,7 @@ static int decode_operand(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt, struct operand *op,
 		op->type = OP_MEM;
 		op->bytes = (ctxt->d & ByteOp) ? 1 : ctxt->op_bytes;
 		op->addr.mem.ea =
-			register_address(ctxt, reg_read(ctxt, VCPU_REGS_RSI));
+			register_address(ctxt, VCPU_REGS_RSI);
 		op->addr.mem.seg = ctxt->seg_override;
 		op->val = 0;
 		op->count = 1;
@@ -4341,7 +4341,7 @@ static int decode_operand(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt, struct operand *op,
 		op->type = OP_MEM;
 		op->bytes = (ctxt->d & ByteOp) ? 1 : ctxt->op_bytes;
 		op->addr.mem.ea =
-			register_address(ctxt,
+			address_mask(ctxt,
 				reg_read(ctxt, VCPU_REGS_RBX) +
 				(reg_read(ctxt, VCPU_REGS_RAX) & 0xff));
 		op->addr.mem.seg = ctxt->seg_override;
@@ -4979,8 +4979,7 @@ int x86_emulate_insn(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt)
 			count = ctxt->src.count;
 		else
 			count = ctxt->dst.count;
-		register_address_increment(ctxt, reg_rmw(ctxt, VCPU_REGS_RCX),
-				-count);
+		register_address_increment(ctxt, VCPU_REGS_RCX, -count);
 
 		if (!string_insn_completed(ctxt)) {
 			/*