wl12xx/wl18xx: use a dynamic PS timeout of 1.5sec

It seems some parties have bad user experience when smaller values are used. This should have little implications for power consumption, since traffic is bursty in nature. Signed-off-by: Arik Nemtsov <arik@wizery.com>
git-mirror · Jul 10, 2012 · 0fc1d2e · 0fc1d2e
1 parent 091185d
commit 0fc1d2e
Show file tree

Hide file tree

Showing 2 changed files with 2 additions and 2 deletions.
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ti/wl12xx/main.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ti/wl12xx/main.c
@@ -242,7 +242,7 @@ static struct wlcore_conf wl12xx_conf = {
 		.psm_entry_retries           = 8,
 		.psm_exit_retries            = 16,
 		.psm_entry_nullfunc_retries  = 3,
-		.dynamic_ps_timeout          = 200,
+		.dynamic_ps_timeout          = 1500,
 		.forced_ps                   = false,
 		.keep_alive_interval         = 55000,
 		.max_listen_interval         = 20,

diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ti/wl18xx/main.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ti/wl18xx/main.c
@@ -369,7 +369,7 @@ static struct wlcore_conf wl18xx_conf = {
 		.psm_entry_retries           = 8,
 		.psm_exit_retries            = 16,
 		.psm_entry_nullfunc_retries  = 3,
-		.dynamic_ps_timeout          = 200,
+		.dynamic_ps_timeout          = 1500,
 		.forced_ps                   = false,
 		.keep_alive_interval         = 55000,
 		.max_listen_interval         = 20,