Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
cpufreq / intel_pstate: remove idle time and duration from sample and…
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history
… calculations

Idle time is taken into account in the APERF/MPERF ratio calculation
there is no reason for the driver to track it seperately.  This
reduces the work in the driver and makes the code more readable.

Removal of the tracking of sample duration removes the possibility of
the divide by zero exception when the duration is sub 1us

References: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=56691
Reported-by: Mike Lothian <mike@fireburn.co.uk>
Cc: 3.9+ <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Dirk Brandewie <dirk.j.brandewie@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
  • Loading branch information
Dirk Brandewie authored and Rafael J. Wysocki committed May 12, 2013
1 parent 559f56c commit 1abc4b2
Showing 1 changed file with 8 additions and 37 deletions.
45 changes: 8 additions & 37 deletions drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -48,12 +48,7 @@ static inline int32_t div_fp(int32_t x, int32_t y)
}

struct sample {
ktime_t start_time;
ktime_t end_time;
int core_pct_busy;
int pstate_pct_busy;
u64 duration_us;
u64 idletime_us;
u64 aperf;
u64 mperf;
int freq;
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -91,8 +86,6 @@ struct cpudata {
int min_pstate_count;
int idle_mode;

ktime_t prev_sample;
u64 prev_idle_time_us;
u64 prev_aperf;
u64 prev_mperf;
int sample_ptr;
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -450,48 +443,26 @@ static inline void intel_pstate_calc_busy(struct cpudata *cpu,
struct sample *sample)
{
u64 core_pct;
sample->pstate_pct_busy = 100 - div64_u64(
sample->idletime_us * 100,
sample->duration_us);
core_pct = div64_u64(sample->aperf * 100, sample->mperf);
sample->freq = cpu->pstate.max_pstate * core_pct * 1000;

sample->core_pct_busy = div_s64((sample->pstate_pct_busy * core_pct),
100);
sample->core_pct_busy = core_pct;
}

static inline void intel_pstate_sample(struct cpudata *cpu)
{
ktime_t now;
u64 idle_time_us;
u64 aperf, mperf;

now = ktime_get();
idle_time_us = get_cpu_idle_time_us(cpu->cpu, NULL);

rdmsrl(MSR_IA32_APERF, aperf);
rdmsrl(MSR_IA32_MPERF, mperf);
/* for the first sample, don't actually record a sample, just
* set the baseline */
if (cpu->prev_idle_time_us > 0) {
cpu->sample_ptr = (cpu->sample_ptr + 1) % SAMPLE_COUNT;
cpu->samples[cpu->sample_ptr].start_time = cpu->prev_sample;
cpu->samples[cpu->sample_ptr].end_time = now;
cpu->samples[cpu->sample_ptr].duration_us =
ktime_us_delta(now, cpu->prev_sample);
cpu->samples[cpu->sample_ptr].idletime_us =
idle_time_us - cpu->prev_idle_time_us;

cpu->samples[cpu->sample_ptr].aperf = aperf;
cpu->samples[cpu->sample_ptr].mperf = mperf;
cpu->samples[cpu->sample_ptr].aperf -= cpu->prev_aperf;
cpu->samples[cpu->sample_ptr].mperf -= cpu->prev_mperf;

intel_pstate_calc_busy(cpu, &cpu->samples[cpu->sample_ptr]);
}
cpu->sample_ptr = (cpu->sample_ptr + 1) % SAMPLE_COUNT;
cpu->samples[cpu->sample_ptr].aperf = aperf;
cpu->samples[cpu->sample_ptr].mperf = mperf;
cpu->samples[cpu->sample_ptr].aperf -= cpu->prev_aperf;
cpu->samples[cpu->sample_ptr].mperf -= cpu->prev_mperf;

intel_pstate_calc_busy(cpu, &cpu->samples[cpu->sample_ptr]);

cpu->prev_sample = now;
cpu->prev_idle_time_us = idle_time_us;
cpu->prev_aperf = aperf;
cpu->prev_mperf = mperf;
}
Expand Down

0 comments on commit 1abc4b2

Please sign in to comment.