Revert "regulator: Move VCOINCELL to be the last element of mc13892_r…

…egulators array"

I check this patch again and found this actually is not a bug
because MC13xxx_DEFINE explictly defines the order of each entry in the array.

Thus revert the patch.

Signed-off-by: Axel Lin <axel.lin@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>

drivers/regulator/mc13892-regulator.c

@@ -259,6 +259,7 @@ static struct regulator_ops mc13892_sw_regulator_ops;
 			mc13xxx_regulator_ops)
 
 static struct mc13xxx_regulator mc13892_regulators[] = {
+	MC13892_DEFINE_REGU(VCOINCELL, POWERCTL0, POWERCTL0, mc13892_vcoincell),
 	MC13892_SW_DEFINE(SW1, SWITCHERS0, SWITCHERS0, mc13892_sw1),
 	MC13892_SW_DEFINE(SW2, SWITCHERS1, SWITCHERS1, mc13892_sw),
 	MC13892_SW_DEFINE(SW3, SWITCHERS2, SWITCHERS2, mc13892_sw),
@@ -292,7 +293,6 @@ static struct mc13xxx_regulator mc13892_regulators[] = {
 	MC13892_GPO_DEFINE(GPO4, POWERMISC, mc13892_gpo),
 	MC13892_GPO_DEFINE(PWGT1SPI, POWERMISC, mc13892_pwgtdrv),
 	MC13892_GPO_DEFINE(PWGT2SPI, POWERMISC, mc13892_pwgtdrv),
-	MC13892_DEFINE_REGU(VCOINCELL, POWERCTL0, POWERCTL0, mc13892_vcoincell),
 };
 
 static int mc13892_powermisc_rmw(struct mc13xxx_regulator_priv *priv, u32 mask,