Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
exec: consolidate 2 fast-paths
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history
Now that we don't pre-allocate the new ->sighand, we can kill the first fast
path, it doesn't make sense any longer. At best, it can save one "list_empty()"
check but leads to the code duplication.

Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@tv-sign.ru>
Cc: Roland McGrath <roland@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
  • Loading branch information
Oleg Nesterov authored and Linus Torvalds committed Oct 17, 2007
1 parent b2c903b commit 356d6d5
Showing 1 changed file with 0 additions and 9 deletions.
9 changes: 0 additions & 9 deletions fs/exec.c
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -752,15 +752,6 @@ static int de_thread(struct task_struct *tsk)
struct task_struct *leader = NULL;
int count;

/*
* If we don't share sighandlers, then we aren't sharing anything
* and we can just re-use it all.
*/
if (atomic_read(&oldsighand->count) <= 1) {
exit_itimers(sig);
return 0;
}

if (thread_group_empty(tsk))
goto no_thread_group;

Expand Down

0 comments on commit 356d6d5

Please sign in to comment.