Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
[NETFILTER]: nf_conntrack: avoid duplicate protocol comparison in nf_…
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history
…ct_tuple_equal()

nf_ct_tuple_src_equal() and nf_ct_tuple_dst_equal() both compare the protocol
numbers. Unfortunately gcc doesn't optimize out the second comparison, so
remove it and prefix both functions with __ to indicate that they should not
be used directly.

Saves another 16 byte of text in __nf_conntrack_find() on x86_64:

  nf_conntrack_tuple_taken |  -20 # 320 -> 300, size inlines: 181 -> 161
  __nf_conntrack_find      |  -16 # 267 -> 251, size inlines: 127 -> 115
  __nf_conntrack_confirm   |  -40 # 875 -> 835, size inlines: 570 -> 537
 3 functions changed, 76 bytes removed

Signed-off-by: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
  • Loading branch information
Patrick McHardy authored and David S. Miller committed Feb 1, 2008
1 parent ba419af commit 380517d
Showing 1 changed file with 8 additions and 9 deletions.
17 changes: 8 additions & 9 deletions include/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_tuple.h
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -132,34 +132,33 @@ struct nf_conntrack_tuple_hash

#endif /* __KERNEL__ */

static inline int nf_ct_tuple_src_equal(const struct nf_conntrack_tuple *t1,
const struct nf_conntrack_tuple *t2)
static inline int __nf_ct_tuple_src_equal(const struct nf_conntrack_tuple *t1,
const struct nf_conntrack_tuple *t2)
{
return (t1->src.u3.all[0] == t2->src.u3.all[0] &&
t1->src.u3.all[1] == t2->src.u3.all[1] &&
t1->src.u3.all[2] == t2->src.u3.all[2] &&
t1->src.u3.all[3] == t2->src.u3.all[3] &&
t1->src.u.all == t2->src.u.all &&
t1->src.l3num == t2->src.l3num &&
t1->dst.protonum == t2->dst.protonum);
t1->src.l3num == t2->src.l3num);
}

static inline int nf_ct_tuple_dst_equal(const struct nf_conntrack_tuple *t1,
const struct nf_conntrack_tuple *t2)
static inline int __nf_ct_tuple_dst_equal(const struct nf_conntrack_tuple *t1,
const struct nf_conntrack_tuple *t2)
{
return (t1->dst.u3.all[0] == t2->dst.u3.all[0] &&
t1->dst.u3.all[1] == t2->dst.u3.all[1] &&
t1->dst.u3.all[2] == t2->dst.u3.all[2] &&
t1->dst.u3.all[3] == t2->dst.u3.all[3] &&
t1->dst.u.all == t2->dst.u.all &&
t1->src.l3num == t2->src.l3num &&
t1->dst.protonum == t2->dst.protonum);
}

static inline int nf_ct_tuple_equal(const struct nf_conntrack_tuple *t1,
const struct nf_conntrack_tuple *t2)
{
return nf_ct_tuple_src_equal(t1, t2) && nf_ct_tuple_dst_equal(t1, t2);
return __nf_ct_tuple_src_equal(t1, t2) &&
__nf_ct_tuple_dst_equal(t1, t2);
}

static inline int nf_ct_tuple_mask_equal(const struct nf_conntrack_tuple_mask *m1,
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -199,7 +198,7 @@ static inline int nf_ct_tuple_mask_cmp(const struct nf_conntrack_tuple *t,
const struct nf_conntrack_tuple_mask *mask)
{
return nf_ct_tuple_src_mask_cmp(t, tuple, mask) &&
nf_ct_tuple_dst_equal(t, tuple);
__nf_ct_tuple_dst_equal(t, tuple);
}

#endif /* _NF_CONNTRACK_TUPLE_H */

0 comments on commit 380517d

Please sign in to comment.