Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
regulator: tps65910: Fix array access out of bounds bug
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history
For tps65910, the number of regulator is 13. ( ARRAY_SIZE(tps65910_regs) is 13)
For tps65911, the number of regulator is 12. ( ARRAY_SIZE(tps65911_regs) is 12)
If we are using this driver for tps65911,
we hit array access out of bounds bug in tps65910_probe() because
current implementation always assume the number of regulator is 13 and
thus it will access tps65911_regs[12].

Fix it by setting correct num_regulators for both chips in tps65910_probe(),
and allocated neccessay memory accordingly.

Signed-off-by: Axel Lin <axel.lin@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
  • Loading branch information
Axel Lin authored and Liam Girdwood committed Jul 22, 2011
1 parent d04156b commit 39aa9b6
Showing 1 changed file with 43 additions and 12 deletions.
55 changes: 43 additions & 12 deletions drivers/regulator/tps65910-regulator.c
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -49,7 +49,6 @@
#define TPS65911_REG_LDO7 11
#define TPS65911_REG_LDO8 12

#define TPS65910_NUM_REGULATOR 13
#define TPS65910_SUPPLY_STATE_ENABLED 0x1

/* supported VIO voltages in milivolts */
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -264,11 +263,12 @@ static struct tps_info tps65911_regs[] = {
};

struct tps65910_reg {
struct regulator_desc desc[TPS65910_NUM_REGULATOR];
struct regulator_desc *desc;
struct tps65910 *mfd;
struct regulator_dev *rdev[TPS65910_NUM_REGULATOR];
struct tps_info *info[TPS65910_NUM_REGULATOR];
struct regulator_dev **rdev;
struct tps_info **info;
struct mutex mutex;
int num_regulators;
int mode;
int (*get_ctrl_reg)(int);
};
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -902,10 +902,12 @@ static __devinit int tps65910_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
switch(tps65910_chip_id(tps65910)) {
case TPS65910:
pmic->get_ctrl_reg = &tps65910_get_ctrl_register;
pmic->num_regulators = ARRAY_SIZE(tps65910_regs);
info = tps65910_regs;
break;
case TPS65911:
pmic->get_ctrl_reg = &tps65911_get_ctrl_register;
pmic->num_regulators = ARRAY_SIZE(tps65911_regs);
info = tps65911_regs;
break;
default:
Expand All @@ -914,7 +916,28 @@ static __devinit int tps65910_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
return -ENODEV;
}

for (i = 0; i < TPS65910_NUM_REGULATOR; i++, info++, reg_data++) {
pmic->desc = kcalloc(pmic->num_regulators,
sizeof(struct regulator_desc), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!pmic->desc) {
err = -ENOMEM;
goto err_free_pmic;
}

pmic->info = kcalloc(pmic->num_regulators,
sizeof(struct tps_info *), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!pmic->info) {
err = -ENOMEM;
goto err_free_desc;
}

pmic->rdev = kcalloc(pmic->num_regulators,
sizeof(struct regulator_dev *), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!pmic->rdev) {
err = -ENOMEM;
goto err_free_info;
}

for (i = 0; i < pmic->num_regulators; i++, info++, reg_data++) {
/* Register the regulators */
pmic->info[i] = info;

Expand Down Expand Up @@ -946,31 +969,39 @@ static __devinit int tps65910_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
"failed to register %s regulator\n",
pdev->name);
err = PTR_ERR(rdev);
goto err;
goto err_unregister_regulator;
}

/* Save regulator for cleanup */
pmic->rdev[i] = rdev;
}
return 0;

err:
err_unregister_regulator:
while (--i >= 0)
regulator_unregister(pmic->rdev[i]);

kfree(pmic->rdev);
err_free_info:
kfree(pmic->info);
err_free_desc:
kfree(pmic->desc);
err_free_pmic:
kfree(pmic);
return err;
}

static int __devexit tps65910_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
{
struct tps65910_reg *tps65910_reg = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
struct tps65910_reg *pmic = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
int i;

for (i = 0; i < TPS65910_NUM_REGULATOR; i++)
regulator_unregister(tps65910_reg->rdev[i]);
for (i = 0; i < pmic->num_regulators; i++)
regulator_unregister(pmic->rdev[i]);

kfree(tps65910_reg);
kfree(pmic->rdev);
kfree(pmic->info);
kfree(pmic->desc);
kfree(pmic);
return 0;
}

Expand Down

0 comments on commit 39aa9b6

Please sign in to comment.