Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
pnfs/blocklayout: remove some debugging
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history
The kbuild test robot complained that we got the printk format wrong.
Let's just kill these printks instead of fixing them as there is not
point after the initial tree algorithm debugging.

Reported-by: kbuild test robot <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
  • Loading branch information
Christoph Hellwig authored and Trond Myklebust committed Sep 12, 2014
1 parent 8d11620 commit 3e3f6b4
Showing 1 changed file with 0 additions and 8 deletions.
8 changes: 0 additions & 8 deletions fs/nfs/blocklayout/extent_tree.c
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -370,9 +370,6 @@ ext_tree_split(struct rb_root *root, struct pnfs_block_extent *be,
struct pnfs_block_extent *new;
sector_t orig_len = be->be_length;

dprintk("%s: need split for 0x%lx:0x%lx at 0x%lx\n",
__func__, be->be_f_offset, ext_f_end(be), split);

new = kzalloc(sizeof(*new), GFP_ATOMIC);
if (!new)
return -ENOMEM;
Expand All @@ -387,11 +384,6 @@ ext_tree_split(struct rb_root *root, struct pnfs_block_extent *be,
new->be_tag = be->be_tag;
new->be_device = nfs4_get_deviceid(be->be_device);

dprintk("%s: got 0x%lx:0x%lx!\n",
__func__, be->be_f_offset, ext_f_end(be));
dprintk("%s: got 0x%lx:0x%lx!\n",
__func__, new->be_f_offset, ext_f_end(new));

__ext_tree_insert(root, new, false);
return 0;
}
Expand Down

0 comments on commit 3e3f6b4

Please sign in to comment.