nfs: fix printout of multiword bitfields

Benny points out that zero-padding of multiword bitfields is necessary,
and that delimiting each word is nice to avoid endianess confusion.

bhalevy: without zero padding output can be ambiguous. Also,
since the printed array of two 32-bit unsigned integers is not a
64-bit number, delimiting the output with a semicolon makes more sense.

Signed-off-by: Fred Isaman <iisaman@citi.umich.edu>
Signed-off-by: Benny Halevy <bhalevy@panasas.com>
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>

fs/nfs/nfs4xdr.c

@@ -1191,8 +1191,8 @@ static int encode_readdir(struct xdr_stream *xdr, const struct nfs4_readdir_arg
 		attrs[1] &= ~FATTR4_WORD1_MOUNTED_ON_FILEID;
 	WRITE32(attrs[0] & readdir->bitmask[0]);
 	WRITE32(attrs[1] & readdir->bitmask[1]);
-	dprintk("%s: cookie = %Lu, verifier = 0x%x%x, bitmap = 0x%x%x\n",
-			__FUNCTION__,
+	dprintk("%s: cookie = %Lu, verifier = %08x:%08x, bitmap = %08x:%08x\n",
+			__func__,
 			(unsigned long long)readdir->cookie,
 			((u32 *)readdir->verifier.data)[0],
 			((u32 *)readdir->verifier.data)[1],
@@ -2291,7 +2291,7 @@ static int decode_attr_supported(struct xdr_stream *xdr, uint32_t *bitmap, uint3
 		bitmap[0] &= ~FATTR4_WORD0_SUPPORTED_ATTRS;
 	} else
 		bitmask[0] = bitmask[1] = 0;
-	dprintk("%s: bitmask=0x%x%x\n", __FUNCTION__, bitmask[0], bitmask[1]);
+	dprintk("%s: bitmask=%08x:%08x\n", __func__, bitmask[0], bitmask[1]);
 	return 0;
 }
 
@@ -3505,8 +3505,8 @@ static int decode_readdir(struct xdr_stream *xdr, struct rpc_rqst *req, struct n
 		return status;
 	READ_BUF(8);
 	COPYMEM(readdir->verifier.data, 8);
-	dprintk("%s: verifier = 0x%x%x\n",
-			__FUNCTION__,
+	dprintk("%s: verifier = %08x:%08x\n",
+			__func__,
 			((u32 *)readdir->verifier.data)[0],
 			((u32 *)readdir->verifier.data)[1]);