Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
---
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history
yaml
---
r: 77895
b: refs/heads/master
c: f5a7a6b
h: refs/heads/master
i:
  77893: 143e980
  77891: d230c3f
  77887: d53ca2e
v: v3
  • Loading branch information
Jan Kara authored and Theodore Ts'o committed Jan 29, 2008
1 parent 62b4bae commit 459e032
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Showing 4 changed files with 13 additions and 11 deletions.
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion [refs]
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -1,2 +1,2 @@
---
refs/heads/master: 36df53f4a3e445175fc1e9d7f433599482ec6d7f
refs/heads/master: f5a7a6b0d9b6af7d46124ed3f6b3995225cb62d0
12 changes: 6 additions & 6 deletions trunk/fs/jbd2/checkpoint.c
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -602,15 +602,15 @@ int __jbd2_journal_remove_checkpoint(struct journal_head *jh)

/*
* There is one special case to worry about: if we have just pulled the
* buffer off a committing transaction's forget list, then even if the
* checkpoint list is empty, the transaction obviously cannot be
* dropped!
* buffer off a running or committing transaction's checkpoing list,
* then even if the checkpoint list is empty, the transaction obviously
* cannot be dropped!
*
* The locking here around j_committing_transaction is a bit sleazy.
* The locking here around t_state is a bit sleazy.
* See the comment at the end of jbd2_journal_commit_transaction().
*/
if (transaction == journal->j_committing_transaction) {
JBUFFER_TRACE(jh, "belongs to committing transaction");
if (transaction->t_state != T_FINISHED) {
JBUFFER_TRACE(jh, "belongs to running/committing transaction");
goto out;
}

Expand Down
8 changes: 4 additions & 4 deletions trunk/fs/jbd2/commit.c
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -867,10 +867,10 @@ void jbd2_journal_commit_transaction(journal_t *journal)
}
spin_unlock(&journal->j_list_lock);
/*
* This is a bit sleazy. We borrow j_list_lock to protect
* journal->j_committing_transaction in __jbd2_journal_remove_checkpoint.
* Really, __jbd2_journal_remove_checkpoint should be using j_state_lock but
* it's a bit hassle to hold that across __jbd2_journal_remove_checkpoint
* This is a bit sleazy. We use j_list_lock to protect transition
* of a transaction into T_FINISHED state and calling
* __jbd2_journal_drop_transaction(). Otherwise we could race with
* other checkpointing code processing the transaction...
*/
spin_lock(&journal->j_state_lock);
spin_lock(&journal->j_list_lock);
Expand Down
2 changes: 2 additions & 0 deletions trunk/include/linux/jbd2.h
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -442,6 +442,8 @@ struct transaction_s
/*
* Transaction's current state
* [no locking - only kjournald2 alters this]
* [j_list_lock] guards transition of a transaction into T_FINISHED
* state and subsequent call of __jbd2_journal_drop_transaction()
* FIXME: needs barriers
* KLUDGE: [use j_state_lock]
*/
Expand Down

0 comments on commit 459e032

Please sign in to comment.