Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
nfsd4: update 4.1 nfsd status documentation
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history
This has gone a little stale.

Reported-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
  • Loading branch information
J. Bruce Fields committed Dec 11, 2013
1 parent 781c2a5 commit 4bd8eab
Showing 1 changed file with 14 additions and 28 deletions.
42 changes: 14 additions & 28 deletions Documentation/filesystems/nfs/nfs41-server.txt
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -5,11 +5,11 @@ Server support for minorversion 1 can be controlled using the
by reading this file will contain either "+4.1" or "-4.1"
correspondingly.

Currently, server support for minorversion 1 is disabled by default.
It can be enabled at run time by writing the string "+4.1" to
Currently, server support for minorversion 1 is enabled by default.
It can be disabled at run time by writing the string "-4.1" to
the /proc/fs/nfsd/versions control file. Note that to write this
control file, the nfsd service must be taken down. Use your user-mode
nfs-utils to set this up; see rpc.nfsd(8)
control file, the nfsd service must be taken down. You can use rpc.nfsd
for this; see rpc.nfsd(8).

(Warning: older servers will interpret "+4.1" and "-4.1" as "+4" and
"-4", respectively. Therefore, code meant to work on both new and old
Expand All @@ -29,29 +29,6 @@ are still under development out of tree.
See http://wiki.linux-nfs.org/wiki/index.php/PNFS_prototype_design
for more information.

The current implementation is intended for developers only: while it
does support ordinary file operations on clients we have tested against
(including the linux client), it is incomplete in ways which may limit
features unexpectedly, cause known bugs in rare cases, or cause
interoperability problems with future clients. Known issues:

- gss support is questionable: currently mounts with kerberos
from a linux client are possible, but we aren't really
conformant with the spec (for example, we don't use kerberos
on the backchannel correctly).
- We do not support SSV, which provides security for shared
client-server state (thus preventing unauthorized tampering
with locks and opens, for example). It is mandatory for
servers to support this, though no clients use it yet.

In addition, some limitations are inherited from the current NFSv4
implementation:

- Incomplete delegation enforcement: if a file is renamed or
unlinked by a local process, a client holding a delegation may
continue to indefinitely allow opens of the file under the old
name.

The table below, taken from the NFSv4.1 document, lists
the operations that are mandatory to implement (REQ), optional
(OPT), and NFSv4.0 operations that are required not to implement (MNI)
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -169,14 +146,23 @@ NS*| CB_WANTS_CANCELLED | OPT | FDELG, | Section 20.10 |

Implementation notes:

SSV:
* The spec claims this is mandatory, but we don't actually know of any
implementations, so we're ignoring it for now. The server returns
NFS4ERR_ENCR_ALG_UNSUPP on EXCHANGE_ID, which should be future-proof.

GSS on the backchannel:
* Again, theoretically required but not widely implemented (in
particular, the current Linux client doesn't request it). We return
NFS4ERR_ENCR_ALG_UNSUPP on CREATE_SESSION.

DELEGPURGE:
* mandatory only for servers that support CLAIM_DELEGATE_PREV and/or
CLAIM_DELEG_PREV_FH (which allows clients to keep delegations that
persist across client reboots). Thus we need not implement this for
now.

EXCHANGE_ID:
* only SP4_NONE state protection supported
* implementation ids are ignored

CREATE_SESSION:
Expand Down

0 comments on commit 4bd8eab

Please sign in to comment.