hugetlb: acquire the i_mmap_lock before walking the prio_tree to unma…

…p a page

When the owner of a mapping fails COW because a child process is holding a
reference, the children VMAs are walked and the page is unmapped.  The
i_mmap_lock is taken for the unmapping of the page but not the walking of
the prio_tree.  In theory, that tree could be changing if the lock is not
held.  This patch takes the i_mmap_lock properly for the duration of the
prio_tree walk.

[hugh.dickins@tiscali.co.uk: Spotted the problem in the first place]
Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>
Acked-by: Hugh Dickins <hugh.dickins@tiscali.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

mm/hugetlb.c

@@ -2237,6 +2237,12 @@ static int unmap_ref_private(struct mm_struct *mm, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
 		+ (vma->vm_pgoff >> PAGE_SHIFT);
 	mapping = (struct address_space *)page_private(page);
 
+	/*
+	 * Take the mapping lock for the duration of the table walk. As
+	 * this mapping should be shared between all the VMAs,
+	 * __unmap_hugepage_range() is called as the lock is already held
+	 */
+	spin_lock(&mapping->i_mmap_lock);
 	vma_prio_tree_foreach(iter_vma, &iter, &mapping->i_mmap, pgoff, pgoff) {
 		/* Do not unmap the current VMA */
 		if (iter_vma == vma)
@@ -2250,10 +2256,11 @@ static int unmap_ref_private(struct mm_struct *mm, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
 		 * from the time of fork. This would look like data corruption
 		 */
 		if (!is_vma_resv_set(iter_vma, HPAGE_RESV_OWNER))
-			unmap_hugepage_range(iter_vma,
+			__unmap_hugepage_range(iter_vma,
 				address, address + huge_page_size(h),
 				page);
 	}
+	spin_unlock(&mapping->i_mmap_lock);
 
 	return 1;
 }