---

yaml
---
r: 316675
b: refs/heads/master
c: 5bd9dd4
h: refs/heads/master
i:
  316673: 7c51368
  316671: a09113b
v: v3

[refs]

@@ -1,2 +1,2 @@
 ---
-refs/heads/master: c511dc1fb6bee58363eb203d53393784f2589d02
+refs/heads/master: 5bd9dd450173bc1464e8218e717d218075b9f1a4

trunk/Documentation/ABI/stable/vdso

@@ -24,4 +24,4 @@ though.
 
 (As of this writing, this ABI documentation as been confirmed for x86_64.
  The maintainers of the other vDSO-using architectures should confirm
- that it is correct for their architecture.)
+ that it is correct for their architecture.)

trunk/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-block-zram

@@ -96,4 +96,4 @@ Description:
 		overhead, allocated for this disk. So, allocator space
 		efficiency can be calculated using compr_data_size and this
 		statistic.
-		Unit: bytes
+		Unit: bytes

trunk/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-bus-usb-devices-usbsevseg

@@ -40,4 +40,4 @@ Description:	Controls the decimal places on the device.
 		the value of 10 ** n. Assume this field has
 		the value k and has 1 or more decimal places set,
 		to set the mth place (where m is not already set),
-		change this fields value to k + 10 ** m.
+		change this fields value to k + 10 ** m.

trunk/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-class-backlight-driver-adp8870

@@ -53,4 +53,4 @@ Description:
 		Documentation/ABI/stable/sysfs-class-backlight.
 		It can be enabled by writing the value stored in
 		/sys/class/backlight/<backlight>/max_brightness to
-		/sys/class/backlight/<backlight>/brightness.
+		/sys/class/backlight/<backlight>/brightness.

trunk/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-power

@@ -231,16 +231,3 @@ Description:
 		Reads from this file return a string consisting of the names of
 		wakeup sources created with the help of /sys/power/wake_lock
 		that are inactive at the moment, separated with spaces.
-
-What:		/sys/power/pm_print_times
-Date:		May 2012
-Contact:	Sameer Nanda <snanda@chromium.org>
-Description:
-		The /sys/power/pm_print_times file allows user space to
-		control whether the time taken by devices to suspend and
-		resume is printed.  These prints are useful for hunting down
-		devices that take too long to suspend or resume.
-
-		Writing a "1" enables this printing while writing a "0"
-		disables it.  The default value is "0".  Reading from this file
-		will display the current value.

trunk/Documentation/DocBook/80211.tmpl

@@ -404,6 +404,7 @@
 !Finclude/net/mac80211.h ieee80211_get_tkip_p1k
 !Finclude/net/mac80211.h ieee80211_get_tkip_p1k_iv
 !Finclude/net/mac80211.h ieee80211_get_tkip_p2k
+!Finclude/net/mac80211.h ieee80211_key_removed
       </chapter>
 
       <chapter id="powersave">

trunk/Documentation/ManagementStyle

@@ -178,7 +178,7 @@ sadly that you are one too, and that while we can all bask in the secure
 knowledge that we're better than the average person (let's face it,
 nobody ever believes that they're average or below-average), we should
 also admit that we're not the sharpest knife around, and there will be
-other people that are less of an idiot than you are. 
+other people that are less of an idiot that you are. 
 
 Some people react badly to smart people.  Others take advantage of them. 
 

trunk/Documentation/RCU/checklist.txt

@@ -162,9 +162,9 @@ over a rather long period of time, but improvements are always welcome!
 		when publicizing a pointer to a structure that can
 		be traversed by an RCU read-side critical section.
 
-5.	If call_rcu(), or a related primitive such as call_rcu_bh(),
-	call_rcu_sched(), or call_srcu() is used, the callback function
-	must be written to be called from softirq context.  In particular,
+5.	If call_rcu(), or a related primitive such as call_rcu_bh() or
+	call_rcu_sched(), is used, the callback function must be
+	written to be called from softirq context.  In particular,
 	it cannot block.
 
 6.	Since synchronize_rcu() can block, it cannot be called from
@@ -202,12 +202,11 @@ over a rather long period of time, but improvements are always welcome!
 	updater uses call_rcu_sched() or synchronize_sched(), then
 	the corresponding readers must disable preemption, possibly
 	by calling rcu_read_lock_sched() and rcu_read_unlock_sched().
-	If the updater uses synchronize_srcu() or call_srcu(),
-	the the corresponding readers must use srcu_read_lock() and
-	srcu_read_unlock(), and with the same srcu_struct.  The rules for
-	the expedited primitives are the same as for their non-expedited
-	counterparts.  Mixing things up will result in confusion and
-	broken kernels.
+	If the updater uses synchronize_srcu(), the the corresponding
+	readers must use srcu_read_lock() and srcu_read_unlock(),
+	and with the same srcu_struct.	The rules for the expedited
+	primitives are the same as for their non-expedited counterparts.
+	Mixing things up will result in confusion and broken kernels.
 
 	One exception to this rule: rcu_read_lock() and rcu_read_unlock()
 	may be substituted for rcu_read_lock_bh() and rcu_read_unlock_bh()
@@ -334,14 +333,14 @@ over a rather long period of time, but improvements are always welcome!
 	victim CPU from ever going offline.)
 
 14.	SRCU (srcu_read_lock(), srcu_read_unlock(), srcu_dereference(),
-	synchronize_srcu(), synchronize_srcu_expedited(), and call_srcu())
-	may only be invoked from process context.  Unlike other forms of
-	RCU, it -is- permissible to block in an SRCU read-side critical
-	section (demarked by srcu_read_lock() and srcu_read_unlock()),
-	hence the "SRCU": "sleepable RCU".  Please note that if you
-	don't need to sleep in read-side critical sections, you should be
-	using RCU rather than SRCU, because RCU is almost always faster
-	and easier to use than is SRCU.
+	synchronize_srcu(), and synchronize_srcu_expedited()) may only
+	be invoked from process context.  Unlike other forms of RCU, it
+	-is- permissible to block in an SRCU read-side critical section
+	(demarked by srcu_read_lock() and srcu_read_unlock()), hence the
+	"SRCU": "sleepable RCU".  Please note that if you don't need
+	to sleep in read-side critical sections, you should be using
+	RCU rather than SRCU, because RCU is almost always faster and
+	easier to use than is SRCU.
 
 	If you need to enter your read-side critical section in a
 	hardirq or exception handler, and then exit that same read-side
@@ -354,8 +353,8 @@ over a rather long period of time, but improvements are always welcome!
 	cleanup_srcu_struct().	These are passed a "struct srcu_struct"
 	that defines the scope of a given SRCU domain.	Once initialized,
 	the srcu_struct is passed to srcu_read_lock(), srcu_read_unlock()
-	synchronize_srcu(), synchronize_srcu_expedited(), and call_srcu().
-	A given synchronize_srcu() waits only for SRCU read-side critical
+	synchronize_srcu(), and synchronize_srcu_expedited().  A given
+	synchronize_srcu() waits only for SRCU read-side critical
 	sections governed by srcu_read_lock() and srcu_read_unlock()
 	calls that have been passed the same srcu_struct.  This property
 	is what makes sleeping read-side critical sections tolerable --
@@ -375,7 +374,7 @@ over a rather long period of time, but improvements are always welcome!
 	requiring SRCU's read-side deadlock immunity or low read-side
 	realtime latency.
 
-	Note that, rcu_assign_pointer() relates to SRCU just as it does
+	Note that, rcu_assign_pointer() relates to SRCU just as they do
 	to other forms of RCU.
 
 15.	The whole point of call_rcu(), synchronize_rcu(), and friends

trunk/Documentation/RCU/rcubarrier.txt

@@ -79,6 +79,8 @@ complete. Pseudo-code using rcu_barrier() is as follows:
    2. Execute rcu_barrier().
    3. Allow the module to be unloaded.
 
+Quick Quiz #1: Why is there no srcu_barrier()?
+
 The rcutorture module makes use of rcu_barrier in its exit function
 as follows:
 
@@ -160,7 +162,7 @@ for any pre-existing callbacks to complete.
 Then lines 55-62 print status and do operation-specific cleanup, and
 then return, permitting the module-unload operation to be completed.
 
-Quick Quiz #1: Is there any other situation where rcu_barrier() might
+Quick Quiz #2: Is there any other situation where rcu_barrier() might
 	be required?
 
 Your module might have additional complications. For example, if your
@@ -240,7 +242,7 @@ reaches zero, as follows:
  4 complete(&rcu_barrier_completion);
  5 }
 
-Quick Quiz #2: What happens if CPU 0's rcu_barrier_func() executes
+Quick Quiz #3: What happens if CPU 0's rcu_barrier_func() executes
 	immediately (thus incrementing rcu_barrier_cpu_count to the
 	value one), but the other CPU's rcu_barrier_func() invocations
 	are delayed for a full grace period? Couldn't this result in
@@ -257,7 +259,12 @@ so that your module may be safely unloaded.
 
 Answers to Quick Quizzes
 
-Quick Quiz #1: Is there any other situation where rcu_barrier() might
+Quick Quiz #1: Why is there no srcu_barrier()?
+
+Answer: Since there is no call_srcu(), there can be no outstanding SRCU
+	callbacks. Therefore, there is no need to wait for them.
+
+Quick Quiz #2: Is there any other situation where rcu_barrier() might
 	be required?
 
 Answer: Interestingly enough, rcu_barrier() was not originally
@@ -271,7 +278,7 @@ Answer: Interestingly enough, rcu_barrier() was not originally
 	implementing rcutorture, and found that rcu_barrier() solves
 	this problem as well.
 
-Quick Quiz #2: What happens if CPU 0's rcu_barrier_func() executes
+Quick Quiz #3: What happens if CPU 0's rcu_barrier_func() executes
 	immediately (thus incrementing rcu_barrier_cpu_count to the
 	value one), but the other CPU's rcu_barrier_func() invocations
 	are delayed for a full grace period? Couldn't this result in

trunk/Documentation/RCU/torture.txt

@@ -174,20 +174,11 @@ torture_type	The type of RCU to test, with string values as follows:
 			and synchronize_rcu_bh_expedited().
 
 		"srcu": srcu_read_lock(), srcu_read_unlock() and
-			call_srcu().
-
-		"srcu_sync": srcu_read_lock(), srcu_read_unlock() and
 			synchronize_srcu().
 
 		"srcu_expedited": srcu_read_lock(), srcu_read_unlock() and
 			synchronize_srcu_expedited().
 
-		"srcu_raw": srcu_read_lock_raw(), srcu_read_unlock_raw(),
-			and call_srcu().
-
-		"srcu_raw_sync": srcu_read_lock_raw(), srcu_read_unlock_raw(),
-			and synchronize_srcu().
-
 		"sched": preempt_disable(), preempt_enable(), and
 			call_rcu_sched().
 

trunk/Documentation/RCU/whatisRCU.txt

@@ -833,9 +833,9 @@ sched:	Critical sections	Grace period		Barrier
 
 SRCU:	Critical sections	Grace period		Barrier
 
-	srcu_read_lock		synchronize_srcu	srcu_barrier
-	srcu_read_unlock	call_srcu
-	srcu_read_lock_raw	synchronize_srcu_expedited
+	srcu_read_lock		synchronize_srcu	N/A
+	srcu_read_unlock	synchronize_srcu_expedited
+	srcu_read_lock_raw
 	srcu_read_unlock_raw
 	srcu_dereference
 

trunk/Documentation/arm/Samsung-S3C24XX/H1940.txt

@@ -37,4 +37,4 @@ Maintainers
   Thanks to the many others who have also provided support.
 
 
-(c) 2005 Ben Dooks
+(c) 2005 Ben Dooks

trunk/Documentation/arm/Samsung-S3C24XX/SMDK2440.txt

@@ -53,4 +53,4 @@ Maintainers
   and to Simtec Electronics for allowing me time to work on this.
 
 
-(c) 2004 Ben Dooks
+(c) 2004 Ben Dooks