Btrfs: Don't substract too much from the allocation target (avoid wra…

…pping)

When metadata allocation clustering has to fall back to unclustered
allocs because large free areas could not be found, it was sometimes
substracting too much from the total bytes to allocate.  This would
make it wrap below zero.

Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>

fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c

@@ -2255,9 +2255,9 @@ static int noinline find_free_extent(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
 		mutex_unlock(&block_group->alloc_mutex);
 new_group_no_lock:
 		last_wanted = 0;
-		if (!allowed_chunk_alloc && loop > 0) {
-			total_needed -= empty_cluster;
-			empty_cluster = 0;
+		if (!allowed_chunk_alloc) {
+			total_needed -= empty_size;
+			empty_size = 0;
 		}
 		/*
 		 * Here's how this works.
@@ -2277,8 +2277,8 @@ static int noinline find_free_extent(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
 			loop++;
 		} else if (loop == 1 && cur == head) {
 
-			total_needed -= empty_cluster;
-			empty_cluster = 0;
+			total_needed -= empty_size;
+			empty_size = 0;
 
 			if (allowed_chunk_alloc && !chunk_alloc_done) {
 				up_read(&space_info->groups_sem);