-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
Commit
This commit does not belong to any branch on this repository, and may belong to a fork outside of the repository.
Now that we have a separate xfs_icdinode_t for the in-core inode which gets logged there is no need anymore for the xfs_dinode vs xfs_dinode_core split - the fact that part of the structure gets logged through the inode log item and a small part not can better be described in a comment. All sizeof operations on the dinode_core either really wanted the icdinode and are switched to that one, or had already added the size of the agi unlinked list pointer. Later both will be replaced with helpers once we get the larger CRC-enabled dinode. Removing the data and attribute fork unions also has the advantage that xfs_dinode.h doesn't need to pull in every header under the sun. While we're at it also add some more comments describing the dinode structure. (First sent on October 7th) Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Reviewed-by: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> Signed-off-by: Niv Sardi <xaiki@sgi.com>
- Loading branch information
Christoph Hellwig
authored and
Niv Sardi
committed
Dec 1, 2008
1 parent
d42f08f
commit 81591fe
Showing
9 changed files
with
124 additions
and
141 deletions.
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.