Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
Blackfin: fix deadlock in SMP IPI handler
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history
When a low priority interrupt (like ethernet) is triggered between 2 high
priority IPI messages, a deadlock in disable_irq() is hit by the second
IPI handler.  This is because the second IPI message is queued within the
first IPI handler, but the handler doesn't process all messages, and new
ones are inserted rather than appended.  So now we process all the pending
messages, and append new ones to the pending list.

URL: http://blackfin.uclinux.org/gf/tracker/5226
Signed-off-by: Sonic Zhang <sonic.zhang@analog.com>
Signed-off-by: Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org>
  • Loading branch information
Sonic Zhang authored and Mike Frysinger committed Jun 13, 2009
1 parent f9ee3ab commit 86f2008
Showing 1 changed file with 7 additions and 6 deletions.
13 changes: 7 additions & 6 deletions arch/blackfin/mach-common/smp.c
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -144,7 +144,7 @@ static void ipi_call_function(unsigned int cpu, struct ipi_message *msg)

static irqreturn_t ipi_handler(int irq, void *dev_instance)
{
struct ipi_message *msg, *mg;
struct ipi_message *msg;
struct ipi_message_queue *msg_queue;
unsigned int cpu = smp_processor_id();

Expand All @@ -154,7 +154,8 @@ static irqreturn_t ipi_handler(int irq, void *dev_instance)
msg_queue->count++;

spin_lock(&msg_queue->lock);
list_for_each_entry_safe(msg, mg, &msg_queue->head, list) {
while (!list_empty(&msg_queue->head)) {
msg = list_entry(msg_queue->head.next, typeof(*msg), list);
list_del(&msg->list);
switch (msg->type) {
case BFIN_IPI_RESCHEDULE:
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -221,7 +222,7 @@ int smp_call_function(void (*func)(void *info), void *info, int wait)
for_each_cpu_mask(cpu, callmap) {
msg_queue = &per_cpu(ipi_msg_queue, cpu);
spin_lock_irqsave(&msg_queue->lock, flags);
list_add(&msg->list, &msg_queue->head);
list_add_tail(&msg->list, &msg_queue->head);
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&msg_queue->lock, flags);
platform_send_ipi_cpu(cpu);
}
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -261,7 +262,7 @@ int smp_call_function_single(int cpuid, void (*func) (void *info), void *info,

msg_queue = &per_cpu(ipi_msg_queue, cpu);
spin_lock_irqsave(&msg_queue->lock, flags);
list_add(&msg->list, &msg_queue->head);
list_add_tail(&msg->list, &msg_queue->head);
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&msg_queue->lock, flags);
platform_send_ipi_cpu(cpu);

Expand Down Expand Up @@ -292,7 +293,7 @@ void smp_send_reschedule(int cpu)

msg_queue = &per_cpu(ipi_msg_queue, cpu);
spin_lock_irqsave(&msg_queue->lock, flags);
list_add(&msg->list, &msg_queue->head);
list_add_tail(&msg->list, &msg_queue->head);
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&msg_queue->lock, flags);
platform_send_ipi_cpu(cpu);

Expand Down Expand Up @@ -320,7 +321,7 @@ void smp_send_stop(void)
for_each_cpu_mask(cpu, callmap) {
msg_queue = &per_cpu(ipi_msg_queue, cpu);
spin_lock_irqsave(&msg_queue->lock, flags);
list_add(&msg->list, &msg_queue->head);
list_add_tail(&msg->list, &msg_queue->head);
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&msg_queue->lock, flags);
platform_send_ipi_cpu(cpu);
}
Expand Down

0 comments on commit 86f2008

Please sign in to comment.