regulator: tps6507x: Avoid duplicating the same mapping table for LDO…

…2 and VDCDCx

The voltage mapping table for LDO2 is exactly the same as VDCDCx.
Thus we can use one mapping table for both LDO2 and VDCDCx instead of
duplicating the mapping table.

Signed-off-by: Axel Lin <axel.lin@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>

drivers/regulator/tps6507x-regulator.c

@@ -70,24 +70,8 @@ static const unsigned int LDO1_VSEL_table[] = {
 	2800000, 3000000, 3100000, 3300000,
 };
 
-static const unsigned int LDO2_VSEL_table[] = {
-	725000, 750000, 775000, 800000,
-	825000, 850000, 875000, 900000,
-	925000, 950000, 975000, 1000000,
-	1025000, 1050000, 1075000, 1100000,
-	1125000, 1150000, 1175000, 1200000,
-	1225000, 1250000, 1275000, 1300000,
-	1325000, 1350000, 1375000, 1400000,
-	1425000, 1450000, 1475000, 1500000,
-	1550000, 1600000, 1650000, 1700000,
-	1750000, 1800000, 1850000, 1900000,
-	1950000, 2000000, 2050000, 2100000,
-	2150000, 2200000, 2250000, 2300000,
-	2350000, 2400000, 2450000, 2500000,
-	2550000, 2600000, 2650000, 2700000,
-	2750000, 2800000, 2850000, 2900000,
-	3000000, 3100000, 3200000, 3300000,
-};
+/* The voltage mapping table for LDO2 is the same as VDCDCx */
+#define LDO2_VSEL_table VDCDCx_VSEL_table
 
 struct tps_info {
 	const char *name;