---

yaml
---
r: 312703
b: refs/heads/master
c: dc7fd27
h: refs/heads/master
i:
  312701: 61b5713
  312699: 30b4f34
  312695: 59d1b76
  312687: d8f74a3
  312671: e237d3b
  312639: 0330956
  312575: 899f2c1
v: v3

[refs]

@@ -1,2 +1,2 @@
 ---
-refs/heads/master: cb47c1831fa406c964468b259f2082c16cc3f757
+refs/heads/master: dc7fd275ae60ef8edf952aff2a62462f5d892fd4

trunk/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-block-rssd

@@ -1,5 +1,26 @@
+What:           /sys/block/rssd*/registers
+Date:           March 2012
+KernelVersion:  3.3
+Contact:        Asai Thambi S P <asamymuthupa@micron.com>
+Description:    This is a read-only file. Dumps below driver information and
+                hardware registers.
+                    - S ACTive
+                    - Command Issue
+                    - Completed
+                    - PORT IRQ STAT
+                    - HOST IRQ STAT
+                    - Allocated
+                    - Commands in Q
+
 What:           /sys/block/rssd*/status
 Date:           April 2012
 KernelVersion:  3.4
 Contact:        Asai Thambi S P <asamymuthupa@micron.com>
 Description:    This is a read-only file. Indicates the status of the device.
+
+What:           /sys/block/rssd*/flags
+Date:           May 2012
+KernelVersion:  3.5
+Contact:        Asai Thambi S P <asamymuthupa@micron.com>
+Description:    This is a read-only file. Dumps the flags in port and driver
+                data structure

trunk/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-class-mtd

@@ -142,14 +142,13 @@ KernelVersion:	3.4
 Contact:	linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org
 Description:
 		This allows the user to examine and adjust the criteria by which
-		mtd returns -EUCLEAN from mtd_read() and mtd_read_oob().  If the
-		maximum number of bit errors that were corrected on any single
-		region comprising an ecc step (as reported by the driver) equals
-		or exceeds this value, -EUCLEAN is returned.  Otherwise, absent
-		an error, 0 is returned.  Higher layers (e.g., UBI) use this
-		return code as an indication that an erase block may be
-		degrading and should be scrutinized as a candidate for being
-		marked as bad.
+		mtd returns -EUCLEAN from mtd_read().  If the maximum number of
+		bit errors that were corrected on any single region comprising
+		an ecc step (as reported by the driver) equals or exceeds this
+		value, -EUCLEAN is returned.  Otherwise, absent an error, 0 is
+		returned.  Higher layers (e.g., UBI) use this return code as an
+		indication that an erase block may be degrading and should be
+		scrutinized as a candidate for being marked as bad.
 
 		The initial value may be specified by the flash device driver.
 		If not, then the default value is ecc_strength.
@@ -168,7 +167,7 @@ Description:
 		block degradation, but high enough to avoid the consequences of
 		a persistent return value of -EUCLEAN on devices where sticky
 		bitflips occur.  Note that if bitflip_threshold exceeds
-		ecc_strength, -EUCLEAN is never returned by the read operations.
+		ecc_strength, -EUCLEAN is never returned by mtd_read().
 		Conversely, if bitflip_threshold is zero, -EUCLEAN is always
 		returned, absent a hard error.
 

trunk/Documentation/DocBook/media/v4l/controls.xml

@@ -3988,7 +3988,7 @@ interface and may change in the future.</para>
 	    from RGB to Y'CbCr color space.
 	    </entry>
 	  </row>
-	  <row>
+	  <row id = "v4l2-jpeg-chroma-subsampling">
 	    <entrytbl spanname="descr" cols="2">
 	      <tbody valign="top">
 		<row>

trunk/Documentation/DocBook/media/v4l/vidioc-g-ext-ctrls.xml

@@ -284,6 +284,13 @@ These controls are described in <xref
 	    processing controls. These controls are described in <xref
 	    linkend="image-process-controls" />.</entry>
 	  </row>
+	  <row>
+	    <entry><constant>V4L2_CTRL_CLASS_JPEG</constant></entry>
+	    <entry>0x9d0000</entry>
+	    <entry>The class containing JPEG compression controls.
+These controls are described in <xref
+		linkend="jpeg-controls" />.</entry>
+	  </row>
 	</tbody>
       </tgroup>
     </table>

trunk/Documentation/RCU/checklist.txt

@@ -162,9 +162,9 @@ over a rather long period of time, but improvements are always welcome!
 		when publicizing a pointer to a structure that can
 		be traversed by an RCU read-side critical section.
 
-5.	If call_rcu(), or a related primitive such as call_rcu_bh(),
-	call_rcu_sched(), or call_srcu() is used, the callback function
-	must be written to be called from softirq context.  In particular,
+5.	If call_rcu(), or a related primitive such as call_rcu_bh() or
+	call_rcu_sched(), is used, the callback function must be
+	written to be called from softirq context.  In particular,
 	it cannot block.
 
 6.	Since synchronize_rcu() can block, it cannot be called from
@@ -202,12 +202,11 @@ over a rather long period of time, but improvements are always welcome!
 	updater uses call_rcu_sched() or synchronize_sched(), then
 	the corresponding readers must disable preemption, possibly
 	by calling rcu_read_lock_sched() and rcu_read_unlock_sched().
-	If the updater uses synchronize_srcu() or call_srcu(),
-	the the corresponding readers must use srcu_read_lock() and
-	srcu_read_unlock(), and with the same srcu_struct.  The rules for
-	the expedited primitives are the same as for their non-expedited
-	counterparts.  Mixing things up will result in confusion and
-	broken kernels.
+	If the updater uses synchronize_srcu(), the the corresponding
+	readers must use srcu_read_lock() and srcu_read_unlock(),
+	and with the same srcu_struct.	The rules for the expedited
+	primitives are the same as for their non-expedited counterparts.
+	Mixing things up will result in confusion and broken kernels.
 
 	One exception to this rule: rcu_read_lock() and rcu_read_unlock()
 	may be substituted for rcu_read_lock_bh() and rcu_read_unlock_bh()
@@ -334,14 +333,14 @@ over a rather long period of time, but improvements are always welcome!
 	victim CPU from ever going offline.)
 
 14.	SRCU (srcu_read_lock(), srcu_read_unlock(), srcu_dereference(),
-	synchronize_srcu(), synchronize_srcu_expedited(), and call_srcu())
-	may only be invoked from process context.  Unlike other forms of
-	RCU, it -is- permissible to block in an SRCU read-side critical
-	section (demarked by srcu_read_lock() and srcu_read_unlock()),
-	hence the "SRCU": "sleepable RCU".  Please note that if you
-	don't need to sleep in read-side critical sections, you should be
-	using RCU rather than SRCU, because RCU is almost always faster
-	and easier to use than is SRCU.
+	synchronize_srcu(), and synchronize_srcu_expedited()) may only
+	be invoked from process context.  Unlike other forms of RCU, it
+	-is- permissible to block in an SRCU read-side critical section
+	(demarked by srcu_read_lock() and srcu_read_unlock()), hence the
+	"SRCU": "sleepable RCU".  Please note that if you don't need
+	to sleep in read-side critical sections, you should be using
+	RCU rather than SRCU, because RCU is almost always faster and
+	easier to use than is SRCU.
 
 	If you need to enter your read-side critical section in a
 	hardirq or exception handler, and then exit that same read-side
@@ -354,8 +353,8 @@ over a rather long period of time, but improvements are always welcome!
 	cleanup_srcu_struct().	These are passed a "struct srcu_struct"
 	that defines the scope of a given SRCU domain.	Once initialized,
 	the srcu_struct is passed to srcu_read_lock(), srcu_read_unlock()
-	synchronize_srcu(), synchronize_srcu_expedited(), and call_srcu().
-	A given synchronize_srcu() waits only for SRCU read-side critical
+	synchronize_srcu(), and synchronize_srcu_expedited().  A given
+	synchronize_srcu() waits only for SRCU read-side critical
 	sections governed by srcu_read_lock() and srcu_read_unlock()
 	calls that have been passed the same srcu_struct.  This property
 	is what makes sleeping read-side critical sections tolerable --
@@ -375,7 +374,7 @@ over a rather long period of time, but improvements are always welcome!
 	requiring SRCU's read-side deadlock immunity or low read-side
 	realtime latency.
 
-	Note that, rcu_assign_pointer() relates to SRCU just as it does
+	Note that, rcu_assign_pointer() relates to SRCU just as they do
 	to other forms of RCU.
 
 15.	The whole point of call_rcu(), synchronize_rcu(), and friends

trunk/Documentation/RCU/rcubarrier.txt

@@ -79,6 +79,8 @@ complete. Pseudo-code using rcu_barrier() is as follows:
    2. Execute rcu_barrier().
    3. Allow the module to be unloaded.
 
+Quick Quiz #1: Why is there no srcu_barrier()?
+
 The rcutorture module makes use of rcu_barrier in its exit function
 as follows:
 
@@ -160,7 +162,7 @@ for any pre-existing callbacks to complete.
 Then lines 55-62 print status and do operation-specific cleanup, and
 then return, permitting the module-unload operation to be completed.
 
-Quick Quiz #1: Is there any other situation where rcu_barrier() might
+Quick Quiz #2: Is there any other situation where rcu_barrier() might
 	be required?
 
 Your module might have additional complications. For example, if your
@@ -240,7 +242,7 @@ reaches zero, as follows:
  4 complete(&rcu_barrier_completion);
  5 }
 
-Quick Quiz #2: What happens if CPU 0's rcu_barrier_func() executes
+Quick Quiz #3: What happens if CPU 0's rcu_barrier_func() executes
 	immediately (thus incrementing rcu_barrier_cpu_count to the
 	value one), but the other CPU's rcu_barrier_func() invocations
 	are delayed for a full grace period? Couldn't this result in
@@ -257,7 +259,12 @@ so that your module may be safely unloaded.
 
 Answers to Quick Quizzes
 
-Quick Quiz #1: Is there any other situation where rcu_barrier() might
+Quick Quiz #1: Why is there no srcu_barrier()?
+
+Answer: Since there is no call_srcu(), there can be no outstanding SRCU
+	callbacks. Therefore, there is no need to wait for them.
+
+Quick Quiz #2: Is there any other situation where rcu_barrier() might
 	be required?
 
 Answer: Interestingly enough, rcu_barrier() was not originally
@@ -271,7 +278,7 @@ Answer: Interestingly enough, rcu_barrier() was not originally
 	implementing rcutorture, and found that rcu_barrier() solves
 	this problem as well.
 
-Quick Quiz #2: What happens if CPU 0's rcu_barrier_func() executes
+Quick Quiz #3: What happens if CPU 0's rcu_barrier_func() executes
 	immediately (thus incrementing rcu_barrier_cpu_count to the
 	value one), but the other CPU's rcu_barrier_func() invocations
 	are delayed for a full grace period? Couldn't this result in

trunk/Documentation/RCU/torture.txt

@@ -174,20 +174,11 @@ torture_type	The type of RCU to test, with string values as follows:
 			and synchronize_rcu_bh_expedited().
 
 		"srcu": srcu_read_lock(), srcu_read_unlock() and
-			call_srcu().
-
-		"srcu_sync": srcu_read_lock(), srcu_read_unlock() and
 			synchronize_srcu().
 
 		"srcu_expedited": srcu_read_lock(), srcu_read_unlock() and
 			synchronize_srcu_expedited().
 
-		"srcu_raw": srcu_read_lock_raw(), srcu_read_unlock_raw(),
-			and call_srcu().
-
-		"srcu_raw_sync": srcu_read_lock_raw(), srcu_read_unlock_raw(),
-			and synchronize_srcu().
-
 		"sched": preempt_disable(), preempt_enable(), and
 			call_rcu_sched().
 

trunk/Documentation/RCU/whatisRCU.txt

@@ -833,9 +833,9 @@ sched:	Critical sections	Grace period		Barrier
 
 SRCU:	Critical sections	Grace period		Barrier
 
-	srcu_read_lock		synchronize_srcu	srcu_barrier
-	srcu_read_unlock	call_srcu
-	srcu_read_lock_raw	synchronize_srcu_expedited
+	srcu_read_lock		synchronize_srcu	N/A
+	srcu_read_unlock	synchronize_srcu_expedited
+	srcu_read_lock_raw
 	srcu_read_unlock_raw
 	srcu_dereference