-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
Commit
This commit does not belong to any branch on this repository, and may belong to a fork outside of the repository.
ring-buffer: move big if statement down
In the hot path of the ring buffer "__rb_reserve_next" there's a big if statement that does not even return back to the work flow. code; if (cross to next page) { [ lots of code ] return; } more code; The condition is even the unlikely path, although we do not denote it with an unlikely because gcc is fine with it. The condition is true when the write crosses a page boundary, and we need to start at a new page. Having this if statement makes it hard to read, but calling another function to do the work is also not appropriate, because we are using a lot of variables that were set before the if statement, and we do not want to send them as parameters. This patch changes it to a goto: code; if (cross to next page) goto next_page; more code; return; next_page: [ lots of code] This makes the code easier to understand, and a bit more obvious. The output from gcc is practically identical. For some reason, gcc decided to use different registers when I switched it to a goto. But other than that, the logic is the same. [ Impact: easier to read code ] Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
- Loading branch information
Steven Rostedt
authored and
Steven Rostedt
committed
May 6, 2009
1 parent
94487d6
commit aa20ae8
Showing
1 changed file
with
111 additions
and
107 deletions.
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters