signals: kill the awful task_rq_unlock_wait() hack

Now that task->signal can't go away we can revert the horrible hack added
by ad474ca ("fix for
account_group_exec_runtime(), make sure ->signal can't be freed under
rq->lock").

And we can do more cleanups sched_stats.h/posix-cpu-timers.c later.

Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: Alan Cox <alan@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Acked-by: Roland McGrath <roland@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

include/linux/sched.h

@@ -268,7 +268,6 @@ extern void init_idle(struct task_struct *idle, int cpu);
 extern void init_idle_bootup_task(struct task_struct *idle);
 
 extern int runqueue_is_locked(int cpu);
-extern void task_rq_unlock_wait(struct task_struct *p);
 
 extern cpumask_var_t nohz_cpu_mask;
 #if defined(CONFIG_SMP) && defined(CONFIG_NO_HZ)

kernel/exit.c

@@ -145,11 +145,6 @@ static void __exit_signal(struct task_struct *tsk)
 	if (sig) {
 		flush_sigqueue(&sig->shared_pending);
 		taskstats_tgid_free(sig);
-		/*
-		 * Make sure ->signal can't go away under rq->lock,
-		 * see account_group_exec_runtime().
-		 */
-		task_rq_unlock_wait(tsk);
 		tty_kref_put(tty);
 	}
 }

kernel/sched.c

@@ -969,14 +969,6 @@ static struct rq *task_rq_lock(struct task_struct *p, unsigned long *flags)
 	}
 }
 
-void task_rq_unlock_wait(struct task_struct *p)
-{
-	struct rq *rq = task_rq(p);
-
-	smp_mb(); /* spin-unlock-wait is not a full memory barrier */
-	raw_spin_unlock_wait(&rq->lock);
-}
-
 static void __task_rq_unlock(struct rq *rq)
 	__releases(rq->lock)
 {