Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
rcu: Initialize multi-level RCU grace periods holding locks
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history
Prior implementations initialized the root and any internal
nodes without holding locks, then initialized the leaves
holding locks.

This is a false economy, as the leaf nodes will usually greatly
outnumber the root and internal nodes.  Acquiring locks on all
nodes is conceptually much simpler as well.

Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: laijs@cn.fujitsu.com
Cc: dipankar@in.ibm.com
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org
Cc: mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca
Cc: josht@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Cc: dvhltc@us.ibm.com
Cc: niv@us.ibm.com
Cc: peterz@infradead.org
LKML-Reference: <12524504773190-git-send-email->
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
  • Loading branch information
Paul E. McKenney authored and Ingo Molnar committed Sep 17, 2009
1 parent de078d8 commit b835db1
Showing 1 changed file with 12 additions and 29 deletions.
41 changes: 12 additions & 29 deletions kernel/rcutree.c
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -645,41 +645,24 @@ rcu_start_gp(struct rcu_state *rsp, unsigned long flags)
spin_lock(&rsp->onofflock); /* irqs already disabled. */

/*
* Set the quiescent-state-needed bits in all the non-leaf RCU
* nodes for all currently online CPUs. This operation relies
* on the layout of the hierarchy within the rsp->node[] array.
* Note that other CPUs will access only the leaves of the
* hierarchy, which still indicate that no grace period is in
* progress. In addition, we have excluded CPU-hotplug operations.
*
* We therefore do not need to hold any locks. Any required
* memory barriers will be supplied by the locks guarding the
* leaf rcu_nodes in the hierarchy.
*/

rnp_end = rsp->level[NUM_RCU_LVLS - 1];
for (rnp_cur = &rsp->node[0]; rnp_cur < rnp_end; rnp_cur++) {
rnp_cur->qsmask = rnp_cur->qsmaskinit;
rnp->gpnum = rsp->gpnum;
}

/*
* Now set up the leaf nodes. Here we must be careful. First,
* we need to hold the lock in order to exclude other CPUs, which
* might be contending for the leaf nodes' locks. Second, as
* soon as we initialize a given leaf node, its CPUs might run
* up the rest of the hierarchy. We must therefore acquire locks
* for each node that we touch during this stage. (But we still
* are excluding CPU-hotplug operations.)
* Set the quiescent-state-needed bits in all the rcu_node
* structures for all currently online CPUs in breadth-first
* order, starting from the root rcu_node structure. This
* operation relies on the layout of the hierarchy within the
* rsp->node[] array. Note that other CPUs will access only
* the leaves of the hierarchy, which still indicate that no
* grace period is in progress, at least until the corresponding
* leaf node has been initialized. In addition, we have excluded
* CPU-hotplug operations.
*
* Note that the grace period cannot complete until we finish
* the initialization process, as there will be at least one
* qsmask bit set in the root node until that time, namely the
* one corresponding to this CPU.
* one corresponding to this CPU, due to the fact that we have
* irqs disabled.
*/
rnp_end = &rsp->node[NUM_RCU_NODES];
rnp_cur = rsp->level[NUM_RCU_LVLS - 1];
for (; rnp_cur < rnp_end; rnp_cur++) {
for (rnp_cur = &rsp->node[0]; rnp_cur < rnp_end; rnp_cur++) {
spin_lock(&rnp_cur->lock); /* irqs already disabled. */
rnp_cur->qsmask = rnp_cur->qsmaskinit;
rnp->gpnum = rsp->gpnum;
Expand Down

0 comments on commit b835db1

Please sign in to comment.