Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
ext4: Don't do GFP_NOFS allocations after taking ext4_lock_group
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history 
We can't do GFP_NOFS allocation after taking ext4_lock_group

BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at mm/slab.c:3054
in_atomic():1, irqs_disabled():0
1 lock held by vi/2426:
#0:  (&ei->i_data_sem){----}, at: [<c01cf665>] ext4_release_file+0x23/0x66
Pid: 2426, comm: vi Not tainted 2.6.25-rc7 #24
[<c011a3dc>] __might_sleep+0xbe/0xc5
[<c01620c9>] kmem_cache_alloc+0x22/0xa6
[<c01e382a>] ext4_mb_release_inode_pa+0x73/0x1b3
[<c01e6adf>] ext4_mb_discard_inode_preallocations+0x22d/0x2d4
[<c013000a>] ? param_set_ushort+0x32/0x39
[<c01ceba1>] ext4_discard_reservation+0x27/0x6a
[<c01cf66c>] ext4_release_file+0x2a/0x66
[<c0165bd6>] __fput+0xae/0x155
[<c0165e46>] fput+0x17/0x19
[<c0163756>] filp_close+0x50/0x5a
[<c01647c0>] sys_close+0x71/0xad
[<c0104aba>] sysenter_past_esp+0x5f/0xa5

Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Mingming Cao <cmm@us.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
  • Loading branch information
Aneesh Kumar K.V authored and Theodore Ts'o committed Apr 30, 2008
1 parent 3dcf545 commit c83617d
Showing 1 changed file with 15 additions and 14 deletions.
29 changes: 15 additions & 14 deletions fs/ext4/mballoc.c
View file
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -3730,9 +3730,9 @@ static int ext4_mb_new_preallocation(struct ext4_allocation_context *ac)
*/
static noinline_for_stack int
ext4_mb_release_inode_pa(struct ext4_buddy *e4b, struct buffer_head *bitmap_bh,
struct ext4_prealloc_space *pa)
struct ext4_prealloc_space *pa,
struct ext4_allocation_context *ac)
{
struct ext4_allocation_context *ac;
struct super_block *sb = e4b->bd_sb;
struct ext4_sb_info *sbi = EXT4_SB(sb);
unsigned long end;
Expand All @@ -3748,8 +3748,6 @@ ext4_mb_release_inode_pa(struct ext4_buddy *e4b, struct buffer_head *bitmap_bh,
BUG_ON(group != e4b->bd_group && pa->pa_len != 0);
end = bit + pa->pa_len;

ac = kmem_cache_alloc(ext4_ac_cachep, GFP_NOFS);

if (ac) {
ac->ac_sb = sb;
ac->ac_inode = pa->pa_inode;
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -3794,23 +3792,19 @@ ext4_mb_release_inode_pa(struct ext4_buddy *e4b, struct buffer_head *bitmap_bh,
*/
}
atomic_add(free, &sbi->s_mb_discarded);
if (ac)
kmem_cache_free(ext4_ac_cachep, ac);

return err;
}

static noinline_for_stack int
ext4_mb_release_group_pa(struct ext4_buddy *e4b,
struct ext4_prealloc_space *pa)
struct ext4_prealloc_space *pa,
struct ext4_allocation_context *ac)
{
struct ext4_allocation_context *ac;
struct super_block *sb = e4b->bd_sb;
ext4_group_t group;
ext4_grpblk_t bit;

ac = kmem_cache_alloc(ext4_ac_cachep, GFP_NOFS);

if (ac)
ac->ac_op = EXT4_MB_HISTORY_DISCARD;

Expand All @@ -3828,7 +3822,6 @@ ext4_mb_release_group_pa(struct ext4_buddy *e4b,
ac->ac_b_ex.fe_len = pa->pa_len;
ac->ac_b_ex.fe_logical = 0;
ext4_mb_store_history(ac);
kmem_cache_free(ext4_ac_cachep, ac);
}

return 0;
Expand All @@ -3850,6 +3843,7 @@ ext4_mb_discard_group_preallocations(struct super_block *sb,
struct ext4_group_info *grp = ext4_get_group_info(sb, group);
struct buffer_head *bitmap_bh = NULL;
struct ext4_prealloc_space *pa, *tmp;
struct ext4_allocation_context *ac;
struct list_head list;
struct ext4_buddy e4b;
int err;
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -3877,6 +3871,7 @@ ext4_mb_discard_group_preallocations(struct super_block *sb,
grp = ext4_get_group_info(sb, group);
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&list);

ac = kmem_cache_alloc(ext4_ac_cachep, GFP_NOFS);
repeat:
ext4_lock_group(sb, group);
list_for_each_entry_safe(pa, tmp,
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -3931,16 +3926,18 @@ ext4_mb_discard_group_preallocations(struct super_block *sb,
spin_unlock(pa->pa_obj_lock);

if (pa->pa_linear)
ext4_mb_release_group_pa(&e4b, pa);
ext4_mb_release_group_pa(&e4b, pa, ac);
else
ext4_mb_release_inode_pa(&e4b, bitmap_bh, pa);
ext4_mb_release_inode_pa(&e4b, bitmap_bh, pa, ac);

list_del(&pa->u.pa_tmp_list);
call_rcu(&(pa)->u.pa_rcu, ext4_mb_pa_callback);
}

out:
ext4_unlock_group(sb, group);
if (ac)
kmem_cache_free(ext4_ac_cachep, ac);
ext4_mb_release_desc(&e4b);
put_bh(bitmap_bh);
return free;
Expand All @@ -3961,6 +3958,7 @@ void ext4_mb_discard_inode_preallocations(struct inode *inode)
struct super_block *sb = inode->i_sb;
struct buffer_head *bitmap_bh = NULL;
struct ext4_prealloc_space *pa, *tmp;
struct ext4_allocation_context *ac;
ext4_group_t group = 0;
struct list_head list;
struct ext4_buddy e4b;
Expand All @@ -3975,6 +3973,7 @@ void ext4_mb_discard_inode_preallocations(struct inode *inode)

INIT_LIST_HEAD(&list);

ac = kmem_cache_alloc(ext4_ac_cachep, GFP_NOFS);
repeat:
/* first, collect all pa's in the inode */
spin_lock(&ei->i_prealloc_lock);
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -4039,7 +4038,7 @@ void ext4_mb_discard_inode_preallocations(struct inode *inode)

ext4_lock_group(sb, group);
list_del(&pa->pa_group_list);
ext4_mb_release_inode_pa(&e4b, bitmap_bh, pa);
ext4_mb_release_inode_pa(&e4b, bitmap_bh, pa, ac);
ext4_unlock_group(sb, group);

ext4_mb_release_desc(&e4b);
Expand All @@ -4048,6 +4047,8 @@ void ext4_mb_discard_inode_preallocations(struct inode *inode)
list_del(&pa->u.pa_tmp_list);
call_rcu(&(pa)->u.pa_rcu, ext4_mb_pa_callback);
}
if (ac)
kmem_cache_free(ext4_ac_cachep, ac);
}

/*
Expand Down

0 comments on commit c83617d

Please sign in to comment.