Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
futex: Correct futex_wait_requeue_pi() commentary
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history
The state machine described in the comments wasn't updated with
a follow-on fix.  Address that and cleanup the corresponding
commentary in the function.

Signed-off-by: Darren Hart <dvhltc@us.ibm.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
LKML-Reference: <4A737C2A.9090001@us.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
  • Loading branch information
Darren Hart authored and Ingo Molnar committed Aug 4, 2009
1 parent a33a052 commit cc6db4e
Showing 1 changed file with 10 additions and 13 deletions.
23 changes: 10 additions & 13 deletions kernel/futex.c
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -2102,19 +2102,19 @@ int handle_early_requeue_pi_wakeup(struct futex_hash_bucket *hb,
* We call schedule in futex_wait_queue_me() when we enqueue and return there
* via the following:
* 1) wakeup on uaddr2 after an atomic lock acquisition by futex_requeue()
* 2) wakeup on uaddr2 after a requeue and subsequent unlock
* 3) signal (before or after requeue)
* 4) timeout (before or after requeue)
* 2) wakeup on uaddr2 after a requeue
* 3) signal
* 4) timeout
*
* If 3, we setup a restart_block with futex_wait_requeue_pi() as the function.
* If 3, cleanup and return -ERESTARTNOINTR.
*
* If 2, we may then block on trying to take the rt_mutex and return via:
* 5) successful lock
* 6) signal
* 7) timeout
* 8) other lock acquisition failure
*
* If 6, we setup a restart_block with futex_lock_pi() as the function.
* If 6, return -EWOULDBLOCK (restarting the syscall would do the same).
*
* If 4 or 7, we cleanup and return with -ETIMEDOUT.
*
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -2232,14 +2232,11 @@ static int futex_wait_requeue_pi(u32 __user *uaddr, int fshared,
rt_mutex_unlock(pi_mutex);
} else if (ret == -EINTR) {
/*
* We've already been requeued, but we have no way to
* restart by calling futex_lock_pi() directly. We
* could restart the syscall, but that will look at
* the user space value and return right away. So we
* drop back with EWOULDBLOCK to tell user space that
* "val" has been changed. That's the same what the
* restart of the syscall would do in
* futex_wait_setup().
* We've already been requeued, but cannot restart by calling
* futex_lock_pi() directly. We could restart this syscall, but
* it would detect that the user space "val" changed and return
* -EWOULDBLOCK. Save the overhead of the restart and return
* -EWOULDBLOCK directly.
*/
ret = -EWOULDBLOCK;
}
Expand Down

0 comments on commit cc6db4e

Please sign in to comment.