Merge tag 'linux-can-fixes-for-3.15-20140519' of git://gitorious.org/…

…linux-can/linux-can

Marc Kleine-Budde says:

====================
pull-request: can 2014-05-19

this is a pull request for net/master, for the v3.15 release cycle,
with a single patch.

Oliver Hartkopp's patch removes a Kconfig option in the c_can driver,
which was added as a workaround during the v3.15 development. With all
cleanup patches this workaround is not needed anymore.
====================

Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

drivers/net/can/c_can/Kconfig

@@ -14,13 +14,6 @@ config CAN_C_CAN_PLATFORM
 	  SPEAr1310 and SPEAr320 evaluation boards & TI (www.ti.com)
 	  boards like am335x, dm814x, dm813x and dm811x.
 
-config CAN_C_CAN_STRICT_FRAME_ORDERING
-	bool "Force a strict RX CAN frame order (may cause frame loss)"
-	---help---
-	  The RX split buffer prevents packet reordering but can cause packet
-	  loss. Only enable this option when you accept to lose CAN frames
-	  in favour of getting the received CAN frames in the correct order.
-
 config CAN_C_CAN_PCI
 	tristate "Generic PCI Bus based C_CAN/D_CAN driver"
 	depends on PCI

drivers/net/can/c_can/c_can.c

@@ -732,26 +732,12 @@ static u32 c_can_adjust_pending(u32 pend)
 static inline void c_can_rx_object_get(struct net_device *dev,
 				       struct c_can_priv *priv, u32 obj)
 {
-#ifdef CONFIG_CAN_C_CAN_STRICT_FRAME_ORDERING
-	if (obj < C_CAN_MSG_RX_LOW_LAST)
-		c_can_object_get(dev, IF_RX, obj, IF_COMM_RCV_LOW);
-	else
-#endif
 		c_can_object_get(dev, IF_RX, obj, priv->comm_rcv_high);
 }
 
 static inline void c_can_rx_finalize(struct net_device *dev,
 				     struct c_can_priv *priv, u32 obj)
 {
-#ifdef CONFIG_CAN_C_CAN_STRICT_FRAME_ORDERING
-	if (obj < C_CAN_MSG_RX_LOW_LAST)
-		priv->rxmasked |= BIT(obj - 1);
-	else if (obj == C_CAN_MSG_RX_LOW_LAST) {
-		priv->rxmasked = 0;
-		/* activate all lower message objects */
-		c_can_activate_all_lower_rx_msg_obj(dev, IF_RX);
-	}
-#endif
 	if (priv->type != BOSCH_D_CAN)
 		c_can_object_get(dev, IF_RX, obj, IF_COMM_CLR_NEWDAT);
 }
@@ -799,9 +785,6 @@ static inline u32 c_can_get_pending(struct c_can_priv *priv)
 {
 	u32 pend = priv->read_reg(priv, C_CAN_NEWDAT1_REG);
 
-#ifdef CONFIG_CAN_C_CAN_STRICT_FRAME_ORDERING
-	pend &= ~priv->rxmasked;
-#endif
 	return pend;
 }
 
@@ -814,25 +797,6 @@ static inline u32 c_can_get_pending(struct c_can_priv *priv)
  * has arrived. To work-around this issue, we keep two groups of message
  * objects whose partitioning is defined by C_CAN_MSG_OBJ_RX_SPLIT.
  *
- * If CONFIG_CAN_C_CAN_STRICT_FRAME_ORDERING = y
- *
- * To ensure in-order frame reception we use the following
- * approach while re-activating a message object to receive further
- * frames:
- * - if the current message object number is lower than
- *   C_CAN_MSG_RX_LOW_LAST, do not clear the NEWDAT bit while clearing
- *   the INTPND bit.
- * - if the current message object number is equal to
- *   C_CAN_MSG_RX_LOW_LAST then clear the NEWDAT bit of all lower
- *   receive message objects.
- * - if the current message object number is greater than
- *   C_CAN_MSG_RX_LOW_LAST then clear the NEWDAT bit of
- *   only this message object.
- *
- * This can cause packet loss!
- *
- * If CONFIG_CAN_C_CAN_STRICT_FRAME_ORDERING = n
- *
  * We clear the newdat bit right away.
  *
  * This can result in packet reordering when the readout is slow.