Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
Fix regression in direct writes performance due to WRITE_ODIRECT flag…
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history
… removal

There seems to be a regression in direct write path due to following
commit in for-2.6.33 branch of block tree.

commit 1af60fb
Author: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@redhat.com>
Date:   Fri Oct 2 18:56:53 2009 -0400

    block: get rid of the WRITE_ODIRECT flag

Marking direct writes as WRITE_SYNC_PLUG instead of WRITE_ODIRECT, sets
the NOIDLE flag in bio and hence in request. This tells CFQ to not expect
more request from the queue and not idle on it (despite the fact that
queue's think time is less and it is not seeky).

So direct writers lose big time when competing with sequential readers.

Using fio, I have run one direct writer and two sequential readers and
following are the results with 2.6.32-rc7 kernel and with for-2.6.33
branch.

Test
====
1 direct writer and 2 sequential reader running simultaneously.

[global]
directory=/mnt/sdc/fio/
runtime=10

[seqwrite]
rw=write
size=4G
direct=1

[seqread]
rw=read
size=2G
numjobs=2

2.6.32-rc7
==========
direct writes: aggrb=2,968KB/s
readers	     : aggrb=101MB/s

for-2.6.33 branch
=================
direct write: aggrb=19KB/s
readers	      aggrb=137MB/s

This patch brings back the WRITE_ODIRECT flag, with the difference that we
don't set the BIO_RW_UNPLUG flag so that device is not unplugged after
submission of request and an explicit unplug from submitter is required.

That way we fix the jeff's issue of not enough merging taking place in aio
path as well as make sure direct writes get their fair share.

After the fix
=============
for-2.6.33 + fix
----------------
direct writes: aggrb=2,728KB/s
reads: aggrb=103MB/s

Thanks
Vivek

Signed-off-by: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
  • Loading branch information
Vivek Goyal authored and Jens Axboe committed Nov 26, 2009
1 parent c16632b commit d9449ce
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Showing 2 changed files with 3 additions and 1 deletion.
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion fs/direct-io.c
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -1124,7 +1124,7 @@ __blockdev_direct_IO(int rw, struct kiocb *iocb, struct inode *inode,
int acquire_i_mutex = 0;

if (rw & WRITE)
rw = WRITE_SYNC_PLUG;
rw = WRITE_ODIRECT_PLUG;

if (bdev)
bdev_blkbits = blksize_bits(bdev_logical_block_size(bdev));
Expand Down
2 changes: 2 additions & 0 deletions include/linux/fs.h
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -129,6 +129,7 @@ struct inodes_stat_t {
* WRITE_SYNC Like WRITE_SYNC_PLUG, but also unplugs the device
* immediately after submission. The write equivalent
* of READ_SYNC.
* WRITE_ODIRECT_PLUG Special case write for O_DIRECT only.
* SWRITE_SYNC
* SWRITE_SYNC_PLUG Like WRITE_SYNC/WRITE_SYNC_PLUG, but locks the buffer.
* See SWRITE.
Expand All @@ -150,6 +151,7 @@ struct inodes_stat_t {
#define READ_META (READ | (1 << BIO_RW_META))
#define WRITE_SYNC_PLUG (WRITE | (1 << BIO_RW_SYNCIO) | (1 << BIO_RW_NOIDLE))
#define WRITE_SYNC (WRITE_SYNC_PLUG | (1 << BIO_RW_UNPLUG))
#define WRITE_ODIRECT_PLUG (WRITE | (1 << BIO_RW_SYNCIO))
#define SWRITE_SYNC_PLUG \
(SWRITE | (1 << BIO_RW_SYNCIO) | (1 << BIO_RW_NOIDLE))
#define SWRITE_SYNC (SWRITE_SYNC_PLUG | (1 << BIO_RW_UNPLUG))
Expand Down

0 comments on commit d9449ce

Please sign in to comment.