[PATCH] i386/x86-64: Remove checks for value == NULL in PCI config sp…

…ace access Nobody should pass NULL here. Could in theory make it a BUG, but the NULL pointer oops will do as well. Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
git-mirror · Apr 11, 2006 · ecc16ba · ecc16ba
1 parent 3d8a4d7
commit ecc16ba
Show file tree

Hide file tree

Showing 3 changed files with 6 additions and 4 deletions.
diff --git a/arch/i386/pci/direct.c b/arch/i386/pci/direct.c
@@ -19,7 +19,7 @@ int pci_conf1_read(unsigned int seg, unsigned int bus,
 {
 	unsigned long flags;
 
-	if (!value || (bus > 255) || (devfn > 255) || (reg > 255)) {
+	if ((bus > 255) || (devfn > 255) || (reg > 255)) {
 		*value = -1;
 		return -EINVAL;
 	}
@@ -94,8 +94,10 @@ static int pci_conf2_read(unsigned int seg, unsigned int bus,
 	unsigned long flags;
 	int dev, fn;
 
-	if (!value || (bus > 255) || (devfn > 255) || (reg > 255))
+	if ((bus > 255) || (devfn > 255) || (reg > 255)) {
+		*value = -1;
 		return -EINVAL;
+	}
 
 	dev = PCI_SLOT(devfn);
 	fn = PCI_FUNC(devfn);

diff --git a/arch/i386/pci/mmconfig.c b/arch/i386/pci/mmconfig.c
@@ -80,7 +80,7 @@ static int pci_mmcfg_read(unsigned int seg, unsigned int bus,
 	unsigned long flags;
 	u32 base;
 
-	if (!value || (bus > 255) || (devfn > 255) || (reg > 4095)) {
+	if ((bus > 255) || (devfn > 255) || (reg > 4095)) {
 		*value = -1;
 		return -EINVAL;
 	}

diff --git a/arch/x86_64/pci/mmconfig.c b/arch/x86_64/pci/mmconfig.c
@@ -75,7 +75,7 @@ static int pci_mmcfg_read(unsigned int seg, unsigned int bus,
 	char __iomem *addr;
 
 	/* Why do we have this when nobody checks it. How about a BUG()!? -AK */
-	if (unlikely(!value || (bus > 255) || (devfn > 255) || (reg > 4095))) {
+	if (unlikely((bus > 255) || (devfn > 255) || (reg > 4095))) {
 		*value = -1;
 		return -EINVAL;
 	}