x86-64, NUMA: Revert NUMA affine page table allocation

This patch reverts NUMA affine page table allocation added by commit
1411e0e (x86-64, numa: Put pgtable to local node memory).

The commit made an undocumented change where the kernel linear mapping
strictly follows intersection of e820 memory map and NUMA
configuration.  If the physical memory configuration has holes or NUMA
nodes are not properly aligned, this leads to using unnecessarily
smaller mapping size which leads to increased TLB pressure.  For
details,

  http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1104672

Patches to fix the problem have been proposed but the underlying code
needs more cleanup and the approach itself seems a bit heavy handed
and it has been determined to revert the feature for now and come back
to it in the next developement cycle.

  http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1105959

As init_memory_mapping_high() callsites have been consolidated since
the commit, reverting is done manually.  Also, the RED-PEN comment in
arch/x86/mm/init.c is not restored as the problem no longer exists
with memblock based top-down early memory allocation.

Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>

arch/x86/include/asm/page_types.h

@@ -54,8 +54,6 @@ static inline phys_addr_t get_max_mapped(void)
 extern unsigned long init_memory_mapping(unsigned long start,
 					 unsigned long end);
 
-void init_memory_mapping_high(void);
-
 extern void initmem_init(void);
 extern void free_initmem(void);
 

arch/x86/kernel/setup.c

@@ -963,6 +963,14 @@ void __init setup_arch(char **cmdline_p)
 	max_low_pfn_mapped = init_memory_mapping(0, max_low_pfn<<PAGE_SHIFT);
 	max_pfn_mapped = max_low_pfn_mapped;
 
+#ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
+	if (max_pfn > max_low_pfn) {
+		max_pfn_mapped = init_memory_mapping(1UL<<32,
+						     max_pfn<<PAGE_SHIFT);
+		/* can we preseve max_low_pfn ?*/
+		max_low_pfn = max_pfn;
+	}
+#endif
 	memblock.current_limit = get_max_mapped();
 
 	/*

arch/x86/mm/init_64.c

@@ -606,63 +606,9 @@ kernel_physical_mapping_init(unsigned long start,
 void __init initmem_init(void)
 {
 	memblock_x86_register_active_regions(0, 0, max_pfn);
-	init_memory_mapping_high();
 }
 #endif
 
-struct mapping_work_data {
-	unsigned long start;
-	unsigned long end;
-	unsigned long pfn_mapped;
-};
-
-static int __init_refok
-mapping_work_fn(unsigned long start_pfn, unsigned long end_pfn, void *datax)
-{
-	struct mapping_work_data *data = datax;
-	unsigned long pfn_mapped;
-	unsigned long final_start, final_end;
-
-	final_start = max_t(unsigned long, start_pfn<<PAGE_SHIFT, data->start);
-	final_end = min_t(unsigned long, end_pfn<<PAGE_SHIFT, data->end);
-
-	if (final_end <= final_start)
-		return 0;
-
-	pfn_mapped = init_memory_mapping(final_start, final_end);
-
-	if (pfn_mapped > data->pfn_mapped)
-		data->pfn_mapped = pfn_mapped;
-
-	return 0;
-}
-
-static unsigned long __init_refok
-init_memory_mapping_active_regions(unsigned long start, unsigned long end)
-{
-	struct mapping_work_data data;
-
-	data.start = start;
-	data.end = end;
-	data.pfn_mapped = 0;
-
-	work_with_active_regions(MAX_NUMNODES, mapping_work_fn, &data);
-
-	return data.pfn_mapped;
-}
-
-void __init_refok init_memory_mapping_high(void)
-{
-	if (max_pfn > max_low_pfn) {
-		max_pfn_mapped = init_memory_mapping_active_regions(1UL<<32,
-							 max_pfn<<PAGE_SHIFT);
-		/* can we preserve max_low_pfn ? */
-		max_low_pfn = max_pfn;
-
-		memblock.current_limit = get_max_mapped();
-	}
-}
-
 void __init paging_init(void)
 {
 	unsigned long max_zone_pfns[MAX_NR_ZONES];

arch/x86/mm/numa_64.c

@@ -543,8 +543,6 @@ static int __init numa_register_memblks(struct numa_meminfo *mi)
 	if (!numa_meminfo_cover_memory(mi))
 		return -EINVAL;
 
-	init_memory_mapping_high();
-
 	/* Finally register nodes. */
 	for_each_node_mask(nid, node_possible_map) {
 		u64 start = (u64)max_pfn << PAGE_SHIFT;