---

yaml
---
r: 173298
b: refs/heads/master
c: eb5ba37
h: refs/heads/master
v: v3

[refs]

@@ -1,2 +1,2 @@
 ---
-refs/heads/master: 67dd2f5a669f48e48ea1013fb80522adca8287f4
+refs/heads/master: eb5ba378bc0ed3f426edee3af7fdcd215a505026

trunk/.gitignore

@@ -25,7 +25,6 @@
 *.elf
 *.bin
 *.gz
-*.bz2
 *.lzma
 *.patch
 *.gcno

trunk/Documentation/DMA-mapping.txt

@@ -214,7 +214,7 @@ most specific mask.
 Here is pseudo-code showing how this might be done:
 
 	#define PLAYBACK_ADDRESS_BITS	DMA_BIT_MASK(32)
-	#define RECORD_ADDRESS_BITS	DMA_BIT_MASK(24)
+	#define RECORD_ADDRESS_BITS	0x00ffffff
 
 	struct my_sound_card *card;
 	struct pci_dev *pdev;
@@ -224,14 +224,14 @@ Here is pseudo-code showing how this might be done:
 		card->playback_enabled = 1;
 	} else {
 		card->playback_enabled = 0;
-		printk(KERN_WARNING "%s: Playback disabled due to DMA limitations.\n",
+		printk(KERN_WARN "%s: Playback disabled due to DMA limitations.\n",
 		       card->name);
 	}
 	if (!pci_set_dma_mask(pdev, RECORD_ADDRESS_BITS)) {
 		card->record_enabled = 1;
 	} else {
 		card->record_enabled = 0;
-		printk(KERN_WARNING "%s: Record disabled due to DMA limitations.\n",
+		printk(KERN_WARN "%s: Record disabled due to DMA limitations.\n",
 		       card->name);
 	}
 

trunk/Documentation/DocBook/kernel-hacking.tmpl

@@ -352,7 +352,7 @@ asmlinkage long sys_mycall(int arg)
   </para>
 
   <programlisting>
-if (signal_pending(current))
+if (signal_pending()) 
         return -ERESTARTSYS;
   </programlisting>
 

trunk/Documentation/DocBook/tracepoint.tmpl

@@ -86,9 +86,4 @@
 !Iinclude/trace/events/irq.h
   </chapter>
 
-  <chapter id="signal">
-   <title>SIGNAL</title>
-!Iinclude/trace/events/signal.h
-  </chapter>
-
 </book>

trunk/Documentation/RCU/trace.txt

@@ -1,10 +1,185 @@
 CONFIG_RCU_TRACE debugfs Files and Formats
 
 
-The rcutree implementation of RCU provides debugfs trace output that
-summarizes counters and state.  This information is useful for debugging
-RCU itself, and can sometimes also help to debug abuses of RCU.
-The following sections describe the debugfs files and formats.
+The rcupreempt and rcutree implementations of RCU provide debugfs trace
+output that summarizes counters and state.  This information is useful for
+debugging RCU itself, and can sometimes also help to debug abuses of RCU.
+Note that the rcuclassic implementation of RCU does not provide debugfs
+trace output.
+
+The following sections describe the debugfs files and formats for
+preemptable RCU (rcupreempt) and hierarchical RCU (rcutree).
+
+
+Preemptable RCU debugfs Files and Formats
+
+This implementation of RCU provides three debugfs files under the
+top-level directory RCU: rcu/rcuctrs (which displays the per-CPU
+counters used by preemptable RCU) rcu/rcugp (which displays grace-period
+counters), and rcu/rcustats (which internal counters for debugging RCU).
+
+The output of "cat rcu/rcuctrs" looks as follows:
+
+CPU last cur F M
+  0    5  -5 0 0
+  1   -1   0 0 0
+  2    0   1 0 0
+  3    0   1 0 0
+  4    0   1 0 0
+  5    0   1 0 0
+  6    0   2 0 0
+  7    0  -1 0 0
+  8    0   1 0 0
+ggp = 26226, state = waitzero
+
+The per-CPU fields are as follows:
+
+o	"CPU" gives the CPU number.  Offline CPUs are not displayed.
+
+o	"last" gives the value of the counter that is being decremented
+	for the current grace period phase.  In the example above,
+	the counters sum to 4, indicating that there are still four
+	RCU read-side critical sections still running that started
+	before the last counter flip.
+
+o	"cur" gives the value of the counter that is currently being
+	both incremented (by rcu_read_lock()) and decremented (by
+	rcu_read_unlock()).  In the example above, the counters sum to
+	1, indicating that there is only one RCU read-side critical section
+	still running that started after the last counter flip.
+
+o	"F" indicates whether RCU is waiting for this CPU to acknowledge
+	a counter flip.  In the above example, RCU is not waiting on any,
+	which is consistent with the state being "waitzero" rather than
+	"waitack".
+
+o	"M" indicates whether RCU is waiting for this CPU to execute a
+	memory barrier.  In the above example, RCU is not waiting on any,
+	which is consistent with the state being "waitzero" rather than
+	"waitmb".
+
+o	"ggp" is the global grace-period counter.
+
+o	"state" is the RCU state, which can be one of the following:
+
+	o	"idle": there is no grace period in progress.
+
+	o	"waitack": RCU just incremented the global grace-period
+		counter, which has the effect of reversing the roles of
+		the "last" and "cur" counters above, and is waiting for
+		all the CPUs to acknowledge the flip.  Once the flip has
+		been acknowledged, CPUs will no longer be incrementing
+		what are now the "last" counters, so that their sum will
+		decrease monotonically down to zero.
+
+	o	"waitzero": RCU is waiting for the sum of the "last" counters
+		to decrease to zero.
+
+	o	"waitmb": RCU is waiting for each CPU to execute a memory
+		barrier, which ensures that instructions from a given CPU's
+		last RCU read-side critical section cannot be reordered
+		with instructions following the memory-barrier instruction.
+
+The output of "cat rcu/rcugp" looks as follows:
+
+oldggp=48870  newggp=48873
+
+Note that reading from this file provokes a synchronize_rcu().  The
+"oldggp" value is that of "ggp" from rcu/rcuctrs above, taken before
+executing the synchronize_rcu(), and the "newggp" value is also the
+"ggp" value, but taken after the synchronize_rcu() command returns.
+
+
+The output of "cat rcu/rcugp" looks as follows:
+
+na=1337955 nl=40 wa=1337915 wl=44 da=1337871 dl=0 dr=1337871 di=1337871
+1=50989 e1=6138 i1=49722 ie1=82 g1=49640 a1=315203 ae1=265563 a2=49640
+z1=1401244 ze1=1351605 z2=49639 m1=5661253 me1=5611614 m2=49639
+
+These are counters tracking internal preemptable-RCU events, however,
+some of them may be useful for debugging algorithms using RCU.  In
+particular, the "nl", "wl", and "dl" values track the number of RCU
+callbacks in various states.  The fields are as follows:
+
+o	"na" is the total number of RCU callbacks that have been enqueued
+	since boot.
+
+o	"nl" is the number of RCU callbacks waiting for the previous
+	grace period to end so that they can start waiting on the next
+	grace period.
+
+o	"wa" is the total number of RCU callbacks that have started waiting
+	for a grace period since boot.  "na" should be roughly equal to
+	"nl" plus "wa".
+
+o	"wl" is the number of RCU callbacks currently waiting for their
+	grace period to end.
+
+o	"da" is the total number of RCU callbacks whose grace periods
+	have completed since boot.  "wa" should be roughly equal to
+	"wl" plus "da".
+
+o	"dr" is the total number of RCU callbacks that have been removed
+	from the list of callbacks ready to invoke.  "dr" should be roughly
+	equal to "da".
+
+o	"di" is the total number of RCU callbacks that have been invoked
+	since boot.  "di" should be roughly equal to "da", though some
+	early versions of preemptable RCU had a bug so that only the
+	last CPU's count of invocations was displayed, rather than the
+	sum of all CPU's counts.
+
+o	"1" is the number of calls to rcu_try_flip().  This should be
+	roughly equal to the sum of "e1", "i1", "a1", "z1", and "m1"
+	described below.  In other words, the number of times that
+	the state machine is visited should be equal to the sum of the
+	number of times that each state is visited plus the number of
+	times that the state-machine lock acquisition failed.
+
+o	"e1" is the number of times that rcu_try_flip() was unable to
+	acquire the fliplock.
+
+o	"i1" is the number of calls to rcu_try_flip_idle().
+
+o	"ie1" is the number of times rcu_try_flip_idle() exited early
+	due to the calling CPU having no work for RCU.
+
+o	"g1" is the number of times that rcu_try_flip_idle() decided
+	to start a new grace period.  "i1" should be roughly equal to
+	"ie1" plus "g1".
+
+o	"a1" is the number of calls to rcu_try_flip_waitack().
+
+o	"ae1" is the number of times that rcu_try_flip_waitack() found
+	that at least one CPU had not yet acknowledge the new grace period
+	(AKA "counter flip").
+
+o	"a2" is the number of time rcu_try_flip_waitack() found that
+	all CPUs had acknowledged.  "a1" should be roughly equal to
+	"ae1" plus "a2".  (This particular output was collected on
+	a 128-CPU machine, hence the smaller-than-usual fraction of
+	calls to rcu_try_flip_waitack() finding all CPUs having already
+	acknowledged.)
+
+o	"z1" is the number of calls to rcu_try_flip_waitzero().
+
+o	"ze1" is the number of times that rcu_try_flip_waitzero() found
+	that not all of the old RCU read-side critical sections had
+	completed.
+
+o	"z2" is the number of times that rcu_try_flip_waitzero() finds
+	the sum of the counters equal to zero, in other words, that
+	all of the old RCU read-side critical sections had completed.
+	The value of "z1" should be roughly equal to "ze1" plus
+	"z2".
+
+o	"m1" is the number of calls to rcu_try_flip_waitmb().
+
+o	"me1" is the number of times that rcu_try_flip_waitmb() finds
+	that at least one CPU has not yet executed a memory barrier.
+
+o	"m2" is the number of times that rcu_try_flip_waitmb() finds that
+	all CPUs have executed a memory barrier.
 
 
 Hierarchical RCU debugfs Files and Formats
@@ -35,10 +210,9 @@ rcu_bh:
   6 c=-275 g=-275 pq=1 pqc=-275 qp=0 dt=859/1 dn=0 df=15 of=0 ri=0 ql=0 b=10
   7 c=-275 g=-275 pq=1 pqc=-275 qp=0 dt=3761/1 dn=0 df=15 of=0 ri=0 ql=0 b=10
 
-The first section lists the rcu_data structures for rcu_sched, the second
-for rcu_bh.  Note that CONFIG_TREE_PREEMPT_RCU kernels will have an
-additional section for rcu_preempt.  Each section has one line per CPU,
-or eight for this 8-CPU system.  The fields are as follows:
+The first section lists the rcu_data structures for rcu, the second for
+rcu_bh.  Each section has one line per CPU, or eight for this 8-CPU system.
+The fields are as follows:
 
 o	The number at the beginning of each line is the CPU number.
 	CPUs numbers followed by an exclamation mark are offline,
@@ -49,9 +223,9 @@ o	The number at the beginning of each line is the CPU number.
 
 o	"c" is the count of grace periods that this CPU believes have
 	completed.  CPUs in dynticks idle mode may lag quite a ways
-	behind, for example, CPU 4 under "rcu_sched" above, which has
-	slept through the past 25 RCU grace periods.  It is not unusual
-	to see CPUs lagging by thousands of grace periods.
+	behind, for example, CPU 4 under "rcu" above, which has slept
+	through the past 25 RCU grace periods.	It is not unusual to
+	see CPUs lagging by thousands of grace periods.
 
 o	"g" is the count of grace periods that this CPU believes have
 	started.  Again, CPUs in dynticks idle mode may lag behind.
@@ -134,10 +308,8 @@ The output of "cat rcu/rcugp" looks as follows:
 rcu_sched: completed=33062  gpnum=33063
 rcu_bh: completed=464  gpnum=464
 
-Again, this output is for both "rcu_sched" and "rcu_bh".  Note that
-kernels built with CONFIG_TREE_PREEMPT_RCU will have an additional
-"rcu_preempt" line.  The fields are taken from the rcu_state structure,
-and are as follows:
+Again, this output is for both "rcu" and "rcu_bh".  The fields are
+taken from the rcu_state structure, and are as follows:
 
 o	"completed" is the number of grace periods that have completed.
 	It is comparable to the "c" field from rcu/rcudata in that a
@@ -152,24 +324,23 @@ o	"gpnum" is the number of grace periods that have started.  It is
 	If these two fields are equal (as they are for "rcu_bh" above),
 	then there is no grace period in progress, in other words, RCU
 	is idle.  On the other hand, if the two fields differ (as they
-	do for "rcu_sched" above), then an RCU grace period is in progress.
+	do for "rcu" above), then an RCU grace period is in progress.
 
 
 The output of "cat rcu/rcuhier" looks as follows, with very long lines:
 
-c=6902 g=6903 s=2 jfq=3 j=72c7 nfqs=13142/nfqsng=0(13142) fqlh=6 oqlen=0
-1/1 .>. 0:127 ^0    
-3/3 .>. 0:35 ^0    0/0 .>. 36:71 ^1    0/0 .>. 72:107 ^2    0/0 .>. 108:127 ^3    
-3/3f .>. 0:5 ^0    2/3 .>. 6:11 ^1    0/0 .>. 12:17 ^2    0/0 .>. 18:23 ^3    0/0 .>. 24:29 ^4    0/0 .>. 30:35 ^5    0/0 .>. 36:41 ^0    0/0 .>. 42:47 ^1    0/0 .>. 48:53 ^2    0/0 .>. 54:59 ^3    0/0 .>. 60:65 ^4    0/0 .>. 66:71 ^5    0/0 .>. 72:77 ^0    0/0 .>. 78:83 ^1    0/0 .>. 84:89 ^2    0/0 .>. 90:95 ^3    0/0 .>. 96:101 ^4    0/0 .>. 102:107 ^5    0/0 .>. 108:113 ^0    0/0 .>. 114:119 ^1    0/0 .>. 120:125 ^2    0/0 .>. 126:127 ^3    
+c=6902 g=6903 s=2 jfq=3 j=72c7 nfqs=13142/nfqsng=0(13142) fqlh=6
+1/1 0:127 ^0    
+3/3 0:35 ^0    0/0 36:71 ^1    0/0 72:107 ^2    0/0 108:127 ^3    
+3/3f 0:5 ^0    2/3 6:11 ^1    0/0 12:17 ^2    0/0 18:23 ^3    0/0 24:29 ^4    0/0 30:35 ^5    0/0 36:41 ^0    0/0 42:47 ^1    0/0 48:53 ^2    0/0 54:59 ^3    0/0 60:65 ^4    0/0 66:71 ^5    0/0 72:77 ^0    0/0 78:83 ^1    0/0 84:89 ^2    0/0 90:95 ^3    0/0 96:101 ^4    0/0 102:107 ^5    0/0 108:113 ^0    0/0 114:119 ^1    0/0 120:125 ^2    0/0 126:127 ^3    
 rcu_bh:
-c=-226 g=-226 s=1 jfq=-5701 j=72c7 nfqs=88/nfqsng=0(88) fqlh=0 oqlen=0
-0/1 .>. 0:127 ^0    
-0/3 .>. 0:35 ^0    0/0 .>. 36:71 ^1    0/0 .>. 72:107 ^2    0/0 .>. 108:127 ^3    
-0/3f .>. 0:5 ^0    0/3 .>. 6:11 ^1    0/0 .>. 12:17 ^2    0/0 .>. 18:23 ^3    0/0 .>. 24:29 ^4    0/0 .>. 30:35 ^5    0/0 .>. 36:41 ^0    0/0 .>. 42:47 ^1    0/0 .>. 48:53 ^2    0/0 .>. 54:59 ^3    0/0 .>. 60:65 ^4    0/0 .>. 66:71 ^5    0/0 .>. 72:77 ^0    0/0 .>. 78:83 ^1    0/0 .>. 84:89 ^2    0/0 .>. 90:95 ^3    0/0 .>. 96:101 ^4    0/0 .>. 102:107 ^5    0/0 .>. 108:113 ^0    0/0 .>. 114:119 ^1    0/0 .>. 120:125 ^2    0/0 .>. 126:127 ^3
+c=-226 g=-226 s=1 jfq=-5701 j=72c7 nfqs=88/nfqsng=0(88) fqlh=0
+0/1 0:127 ^0    
+0/3 0:35 ^0    0/0 36:71 ^1    0/0 72:107 ^2    0/0 108:127 ^3    
+0/3f 0:5 ^0    0/3 6:11 ^1    0/0 12:17 ^2    0/0 18:23 ^3    0/0 24:29 ^4    0/0 30:35 ^5    0/0 36:41 ^0    0/0 42:47 ^1    0/0 48:53 ^2    0/0 54:59 ^3    0/0 60:65 ^4    0/0 66:71 ^5    0/0 72:77 ^0    0/0 78:83 ^1    0/0 84:89 ^2    0/0 90:95 ^3    0/0 96:101 ^4    0/0 102:107 ^5    0/0 108:113 ^0    0/0 114:119 ^1    0/0 120:125 ^2    0/0 126:127 ^3
 
-This is once again split into "rcu_sched" and "rcu_bh" portions,
-and CONFIG_TREE_PREEMPT_RCU kernels will again have an additional
-"rcu_preempt" section.  The fields are as follows:
+This is once again split into "rcu" and "rcu_bh" portions.  The fields are
+as follows:
 
 o	"c" is exactly the same as "completed" under rcu/rcugp.
 
@@ -201,19 +372,14 @@ o	"fqlh" is the number of calls to force_quiescent_state() that
 	exited immediately (without even being counted in nfqs above)
 	due to contention on ->fqslock.
 
-o	"oqlen" is the number of callbacks on the "orphan" callback
-	list.  RCU callbacks are placed on this list by CPUs going
-	offline, and are "adopted" either by the CPU helping the outgoing
-	CPU or by the next rcu_barrier*() call, whichever comes first.
-
 o	Each element of the form "1/1 0:127 ^0" represents one struct
 	rcu_node.  Each line represents one level of the hierarchy, from
 	root to leaves.  It is best to think of the rcu_data structures
 	as forming yet another level after the leaves.  Note that there
 	might be either one, two, or three levels of rcu_node structures,
 	depending on the relationship between CONFIG_RCU_FANOUT and
 	CONFIG_NR_CPUS.
-
+	
 	o	The numbers separated by the "/" are the qsmask followed
 		by the qsmaskinit.  The qsmask will have one bit
 		set for each entity in the next lower level that
@@ -223,19 +389,10 @@ o	Each element of the form "1/1 0:127 ^0" represents one struct
 		The value of qsmaskinit is assigned to that of qsmask
 		at the beginning of each grace period.
 
-		For example, for "rcu_sched", the qsmask of the first
-		entry of the lowest level is 0x14, meaning that we
-		are still waiting for CPUs 2 and 4 to check in for the
-		current grace period.
-
-	o	The characters separated by the ">" indicate the state
-		of the blocked-tasks lists.  A "T" preceding the ">"
-		indicates that at least one task blocked in an RCU
-		read-side critical section blocks the current grace
-		period, while a "." preceding the ">" indicates otherwise.
-		The character following the ">" indicates similarly for
-		the next grace period.  A "T" should appear in this
-		field only for rcu-preempt.
+		For example, for "rcu", the qsmask of the first entry
+		of the lowest level is 0x14, meaning that we are still
+		waiting for CPUs 2 and 4 to check in for the current
+		grace period.
 
 	o	The numbers separated by the ":" are the range of CPUs
 		served by this struct rcu_node.  This can be helpful
@@ -274,9 +431,8 @@ rcu_bh:
   6 np=120834 qsp=9902 cbr=0 cng=0 gpc=6 gps=3 nf=2 nn=110921
   7 np=144888 qsp=26336 cbr=0 cng=0 gpc=8 gps=2 nf=0 nn=118542
 
-As always, this is once again split into "rcu_sched" and "rcu_bh"
-portions, with CONFIG_TREE_PREEMPT_RCU kernels having an additional
-"rcu_preempt" section.  The fields are as follows:
+As always, this is once again split into "rcu" and "rcu_bh" portions.
+The fields are as follows:
 
 o	"np" is the number of times that __rcu_pending() has been invoked
 	for the corresponding flavor of RCU.

trunk/Documentation/RCU/whatisRCU.txt

@@ -830,7 +830,7 @@ sched:	Critical sections	Grace period		Barrier
 SRCU:	Critical sections	Grace period		Barrier
 
 	srcu_read_lock		synchronize_srcu	N/A
-	srcu_read_unlock	synchronize_srcu_expedited
+	srcu_read_unlock
 
 SRCU:	Initialization/cleanup
 	init_srcu_struct

trunk/Documentation/arm/Samsung-S3C24XX/EB2410ITX.txt

@@ -55,4 +55,4 @@ Maintainers
   This board is maintained by Simtec Electronics.
 
 
-Copyright 2004 Ben Dooks, Simtec Electronics
+(c) 2004 Ben Dooks, Simtec Electronics