Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
locks: use cmpxchg to assign i_flctx pointer
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history
During the v3.20/v4.0 cycle, I had originally had the code manage the
inode->i_flctx pointer using a compare-and-swap operation instead of the
i_lock.

Sasha Levin though hit a problem while testing with trinity that made me
believe that that wasn't safe. At the time, changing the code to protect
the i_flctx pointer seemed to fix the issue, but I now think that was
just coincidence.

The issue was likely the same race that Kirill Shutemov hit while
testing the pre-rc1 v4.0 kernel and that Linus spotted. Due to the way
that the spinlock was dropped in the middle of flock_lock_file, you
could end up with multiple flock locks for the same struct file on the
inode.

Reinstate the use of a CAS operation to assign this pointer since it's
likely to be more efficient and gets the i_lock completely out of the
file locking business.

Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jeff.layton@primarydata.com>
  • Loading branch information
Jeff Layton committed Apr 3, 2015
1 parent 3648888 commit 0429c2b
Showing 1 changed file with 1 addition and 8 deletions.
9 changes: 1 addition & 8 deletions fs/locks.c
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -223,14 +223,7 @@ locks_get_lock_context(struct inode *inode, int type)
* Assign the pointer if it's not already assigned. If it is, then
* free the context we just allocated.
*/
spin_lock(&inode->i_lock);
if (likely(!inode->i_flctx)) {
inode->i_flctx = new;
new = NULL;
}
spin_unlock(&inode->i_lock);

if (new)
if (cmpxchg(&inode->i_flctx, NULL, new))
kmem_cache_free(flctx_cache, new);
out:
return inode->i_flctx;
Expand Down

0 comments on commit 0429c2b

Please sign in to comment.