x86: Fix MSI-X initialization by using online_mask for x2apic target_…

…cpus found a system where x2apic reports an MSI-X irq initialization failure: [ 302.859446] igbvf 0000:81:10.4: enabling device (0000 -> 0002) [ 302.874369] igbvf 0000:81:10.4: using 64bit DMA mask [ 302.879023] igbvf 0000:81:10.4: using 64bit consistent DMA mask [ 302.894386] igbvf 0000:81:10.4: enabling bus mastering [ 302.898171] igbvf 0000:81:10.4: setting latency timer to 64 [ 302.914050] reserve_memtype added 0xefb08000-0xefb0c000, track uncached-minus, req uncached-minus, ret uncached-minus [ 302.933839] reserve_memtype added 0xefb28000-0xefb29000, track uncached-minus, req uncached-minus, ret uncached-minus [ 302.940367] alloc irq_desc for 265 on node 4 [ 302.956874] alloc kstat_irqs on node 4 [ 302.959452] alloc irq_2_iommu on node 0 [ 302.974328] igbvf 0000:81:10.4: irq 265 for MSI/MSI-X [ 302.977778] alloc irq_desc for 266 on node 4 [ 302.980347] alloc kstat_irqs on node 4 [ 302.995312] free_memtype request 0xefb28000-0xefb29000 [ 302.998816] igbvf 0000:81:10.4: Failed to initialize MSI-X interrupts. ... it turns out that when trying to enable MSI-X, __assign_irq_vector(new, cfg_new, apic->target_cpus()) can not get vector because for x2apic target-cpus returns cpumask_of(0) Update that to online_mask like xapic. Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> Acked-by: Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com> LKML-Reference: <4A785AFF.3050902@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
mariux64 · Aug 8, 2009 · 087d7e5 · 087d7e5
1 parent 7d5b005
commit 087d7e5
Show file tree

Hide file tree

Showing 2 changed files with 10 additions and 6 deletions.
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/apic/x2apic_cluster.c b/arch/x86/kernel/apic/x2apic_cluster.c
@@ -17,11 +17,13 @@ static int x2apic_acpi_madt_oem_check(char *oem_id, char *oem_table_id)
 	return x2apic_enabled();
 }
 
-/* Start with all IRQs pointing to boot CPU.  IRQ balancing will shift them. */
-
+/*
+ * need to use more than cpu 0, because we need more vectors when
+ * MSI-X are used.
+ */
 static const struct cpumask *x2apic_target_cpus(void)
 {
-	return cpumask_of(0);
+	return cpu_online_mask;
 }
 
 /*

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/apic/x2apic_phys.c b/arch/x86/kernel/apic/x2apic_phys.c
@@ -27,11 +27,13 @@ static int x2apic_acpi_madt_oem_check(char *oem_id, char *oem_table_id)
 		return 0;
 }
 
-/* Start with all IRQs pointing to boot CPU.  IRQ balancing will shift them. */
-
+/*
+ * need to use more than cpu 0, because we need more vectors when
+ * MSI-X are used.
+ */
 static const struct cpumask *x2apic_target_cpus(void)
 {
-	return cpumask_of(0);
+	return cpu_online_mask;
 }
 
 static void x2apic_vector_allocation_domain(int cpu, struct cpumask *retmask)