Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
drm/i915: Don't set queue_priority_hint if we don't kick the submission
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history
If we change the priority of the active context, then it has no impact
on the decision of whether to preempt the active context -- we don't
preempt the context with itself. In this situation, we elide the tasklet
rescheduling and should *not* be marking up the queue_priority_hint as
that may mask a later submission where we decide we don't have to kick
the tasklet as a higher priority submission is pending (spoiler alert,
it was not).

Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191021080226.537-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
  • Loading branch information
Chris Wilson committed Oct 21, 2019
1 parent ce53908 commit 13ed13a
Showing 1 changed file with 22 additions and 15 deletions.
37 changes: 22 additions & 15 deletions drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_scheduler.c
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -189,22 +189,34 @@ static inline bool need_preempt(int prio, int active)
return prio >= max(I915_PRIORITY_NORMAL, active);
}

static void kick_submission(struct intel_engine_cs *engine, int prio)
static void kick_submission(struct intel_engine_cs *engine,
const struct i915_request *rq,
int prio)
{
const struct i915_request *inflight =
execlists_active(&engine->execlists);
const struct i915_request *inflight;

/*
* We only need to kick the tasklet once for the high priority
* new context we add into the queue.
*/
if (prio <= engine->execlists.queue_priority_hint)
return;

/* Nothing currently active? We're overdue for a submission! */
inflight = execlists_active(&engine->execlists);
if (!inflight)
return;

/*
* If we are already the currently executing context, don't
* bother evaluating if we should preempt ourselves, or if
* we expect nothing to change as a result of running the
* tasklet, i.e. we have not change the priority queue
* sufficiently to oust the running context.
* bother evaluating if we should preempt ourselves.
*/
if (!inflight || !need_preempt(prio, rq_prio(inflight)))
if (inflight->hw_context == rq->hw_context)
return;

tasklet_hi_schedule(&engine->execlists.tasklet);
engine->execlists.queue_priority_hint = prio;
if (need_preempt(prio, rq_prio(inflight)))
tasklet_hi_schedule(&engine->execlists.tasklet);
}

static void __i915_schedule(struct i915_sched_node *node,
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -330,13 +342,8 @@ static void __i915_schedule(struct i915_sched_node *node,
list_move_tail(&node->link, cache.priolist);
}

if (prio <= engine->execlists.queue_priority_hint)
continue;

engine->execlists.queue_priority_hint = prio;

/* Defer (tasklet) submission until after all of our updates. */
kick_submission(engine, prio);
kick_submission(engine, node_to_request(node), prio);
}

spin_unlock(&engine->active.lock);
Expand Down

0 comments on commit 13ed13a

Please sign in to comment.